'What are nurses' and healthcare workers' cultural understandings of dementia?' An integrative literature review.

Catharine Jenkins, Analisa Smythe
{"title":"'What are nurses' and healthcare workers' cultural understandings of dementia?' An integrative literature review.","authors":"Catharine Jenkins, Analisa Smythe","doi":"10.1177/14713012241285525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> to explore the range of cultural understandings of dementia held by people providing nursing care globally.<b>Background:</b> There is a worldwide shortage of nurses and healthcare workers, resulting in extensive global mobility among the workforce. Cultural competence is expected of nurses who serve diverse populations and although self-awareness is recognised as crucial in developing this ability, the focus has tended to be on the identity of the patient and adjusting care according to their specific needs. However, taken-for-granted assumptions drive unconscious judgements and therefore behaviour so nurses' dementia-related understandings are worthy of exploration.<b>Design:</b> An integrative literature review, comprising five stages: problem identification; literature search; data evaluation; data analysis; and presentation of the findings.<b>Methods:</b> Six databases were searched for original research published between 1997 and 2023. Studies which focus on qualified/registered and unqualified/unregistered healthcare workers' cultural understandings of dementia were included. Studies were evaluated using a tool designed for the critical assessment of qualitative research. Data was extracted using a bespoke spreadsheet. Conventional content analysis was undertaken to develop a synthesised summary of the findings of the studies.<b>Findings:</b> 11 papers met the inclusion criteria. Content analysis led to identification of two main themes: 'Stigma as a common factor in cultural perceptions of dementia', and 'Stigma derived from cultural perceptions has consequences for people living with dementia'.<b>Conclusion:</b> An international perspective facilitated insight into alternative perceptions of the nature of dementia and care responses. A version of the 'Relationship Centred Care' model, expanded to include the wider community, could support theoretical and practical recommendations for culturally congruent approaches to care. Further research is required to examine the usefulness of incorporating this approach internationally.<b>Reporting Method:</b> The authors followed the ENTREQ reporting guidelines (Tong et al., 2012).</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012241285525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241285525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to explore the range of cultural understandings of dementia held by people providing nursing care globally.Background: There is a worldwide shortage of nurses and healthcare workers, resulting in extensive global mobility among the workforce. Cultural competence is expected of nurses who serve diverse populations and although self-awareness is recognised as crucial in developing this ability, the focus has tended to be on the identity of the patient and adjusting care according to their specific needs. However, taken-for-granted assumptions drive unconscious judgements and therefore behaviour so nurses' dementia-related understandings are worthy of exploration.Design: An integrative literature review, comprising five stages: problem identification; literature search; data evaluation; data analysis; and presentation of the findings.Methods: Six databases were searched for original research published between 1997 and 2023. Studies which focus on qualified/registered and unqualified/unregistered healthcare workers' cultural understandings of dementia were included. Studies were evaluated using a tool designed for the critical assessment of qualitative research. Data was extracted using a bespoke spreadsheet. Conventional content analysis was undertaken to develop a synthesised summary of the findings of the studies.Findings: 11 papers met the inclusion criteria. Content analysis led to identification of two main themes: 'Stigma as a common factor in cultural perceptions of dementia', and 'Stigma derived from cultural perceptions has consequences for people living with dementia'.Conclusion: An international perspective facilitated insight into alternative perceptions of the nature of dementia and care responses. A version of the 'Relationship Centred Care' model, expanded to include the wider community, could support theoretical and practical recommendations for culturally congruent approaches to care. Further research is required to examine the usefulness of incorporating this approach internationally.Reporting Method: The authors followed the ENTREQ reporting guidelines (Tong et al., 2012).

护士和医护人员对痴呆症的文化理解是什么?综合文献综述。
目的:探讨全球护理人员对痴呆症的各种文化理解:背景:全球护士和医护人员短缺,导致劳动力在全球范围内广泛流动。虽然自我意识被认为是培养这种能力的关键,但人们往往将重点放在病人的身份以及根据他们的具体需求调整护理上。然而,理所当然的假设会驱动无意识的判断,进而影响行为,因此护士对痴呆症的相关理解值得探讨:设计:综合文献综述,包括五个阶段:发现问题、文献检索、数据评估、数据分析和结果陈述:我们在六个数据库中搜索了 1997 年至 2023 年间发表的原创研究。重点关注合格/注册和不合格/未注册医护人员对痴呆症的文化理解的研究被纳入其中。研究评估采用了一种专为定性研究的批判性评估而设计的工具。使用定制的电子表格提取数据。采用传统的内容分析法对研究结果进行综合总结:11 篇论文符合纳入标准。通过内容分析,确定了两大主题:"成见是痴呆症文化观念中的共同因素 "和 "文化观念产生的成见会对痴呆症患者造成影响":国际视角有助于深入了解人们对痴呆症的性质和护理对策的不同看法。将 "以关系为中心的护理 "模式扩展到更广泛的社区,可以为理论和实践建议提供支持,从而提供与文化相一致的护理方法。需要进一步开展研究,以探讨在国际范围内采用这种方法的实用性:作者遵循 ENTREQ 报告指南(Tong 等人,2012 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信