Kidney transplantation outcomes: Is it possible to improve when good results are falling down?

Fernando M Gonzalez, Francisca Del Rocío Gonzalez Cohens
{"title":"Kidney transplantation outcomes: Is it possible to improve when good results are falling down?","authors":"Fernando M Gonzalez, Francisca Del Rocío Gonzalez Cohens","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.91214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Famure <i>et al</i> describe that close to 50% of their patients needed early or very early hospital readmissions after their kidney transplantation. As they taught us the variables related to those outcomes, we describe eight teaching capsules that may go beyond what they describe in their article. First two capsules talk about the ideal donors and recipients we should choose for avoiding the risk of an early readmission. The third and fourth capsules tell us about the reality of cadaveric donors and recipients with comorbidities, and the way transplant physicians should choose them to maximize survival. Fifth capsule shows that any mistake can result in an early readmission, and thus, in poorer outcomes. Sixth capsule talks about economic losses of early readmissions, cost-effectiveness of transplantation, and how to improve outcomes and reduce costs by managing a risky patient-portfolio. Seventh capsule argues about knowing your risk behavior to better manage your portfolio; and Eighth capsule about the importance of the center experience in transplanting complex patients. We finish with some lessons of the importance of the transplantation process and the collaboration with other disciplines in order to prevent the conditions that lead to early readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":65557,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志","volume":"14 3","pages":"91214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.91214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Famure et al describe that close to 50% of their patients needed early or very early hospital readmissions after their kidney transplantation. As they taught us the variables related to those outcomes, we describe eight teaching capsules that may go beyond what they describe in their article. First two capsules talk about the ideal donors and recipients we should choose for avoiding the risk of an early readmission. The third and fourth capsules tell us about the reality of cadaveric donors and recipients with comorbidities, and the way transplant physicians should choose them to maximize survival. Fifth capsule shows that any mistake can result in an early readmission, and thus, in poorer outcomes. Sixth capsule talks about economic losses of early readmissions, cost-effectiveness of transplantation, and how to improve outcomes and reduce costs by managing a risky patient-portfolio. Seventh capsule argues about knowing your risk behavior to better manage your portfolio; and Eighth capsule about the importance of the center experience in transplanting complex patients. We finish with some lessons of the importance of the transplantation process and the collaboration with other disciplines in order to prevent the conditions that lead to early readmissions.

肾移植结果:当良好结果出现下滑时,是否有可能改进?
Famure 等人描述说,他们的病人中有将近 50% 的人在肾移植后需要提前或很早重新入院。他们向我们传授了与这些结果相关的变量,而我们则介绍了八项教学内容,这些内容可能超出了他们在文章中的描述。前两个模块讲述了我们应该选择什么样的理想供体和受体来避免早期再入院的风险。第三和第四个胶囊告诉我们有合并症的尸体供体和受体的现实情况,以及移植医生应该如何选择他们,以最大限度地提高存活率。第五个胶囊告诉我们,任何失误都可能导致提前再入院,从而导致更差的结果。第六个胶囊讲述了早期再入院的经济损失、移植的成本效益以及如何通过管理高风险患者组合来改善预后和降低成本。第七个胶囊论证了了解自己的风险行为以更好地管理自己的组合;第八个胶囊论述了中心经验在移植复杂病人方面的重要性。最后,我们总结了移植过程的重要性以及与其他学科合作的一些经验,以防止出现导致早期再入院的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
293
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信