Discontinuing the Term "Stakeholder" From the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory Engaging Partners Team: An Example of the Process of Language Change in an Organization.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2024.08.016
Evan Plys, Karen O Moss, Kristen Jacklin, Molita Yazzie, Ellen Tambor, Erin Luers, Linda Elam, Nina Ahmad, Zachary J Kunicki, Carolyn Malone, Gary Epstein-Lubow
{"title":"Discontinuing the Term \"Stakeholder\" From the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory Engaging Partners Team: An Example of the Process of Language Change in an Organization.","authors":"Evan Plys, Karen O Moss, Kristen Jacklin, Molita Yazzie, Ellen Tambor, Erin Luers, Linda Elam, Nina Ahmad, Zachary J Kunicki, Carolyn Malone, Gary Epstein-Lubow","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we describe our process of changing language of the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer's disease and AD-related dementias Clinical Trials Collaboratory (NIA IMPACT Collaboratory) \"Stakeholder Engagement Team\" to \"Engaging Partners Team\" in response to feedback from community partners regarding the problematic connotations of the term \"stakeholder.\" We present a brief history of the term \"stakeholder\" and its use in clinical and community-engaged research. Then, we summarize critiques of this term, including its colonial history and potential to reinforce complacency with generational traumas, particularly among Indigenous peoples and communities. We conclude with a detailed overview of our team and organization's multi-step process to discontinue use of the term \"stakeholder,\" in alignment with a theoretical model of organizational behavior change. This paper highlights the importance of critically evaluating language and responding to community partners. We hope our process can guide other researchers and organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"192-199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11710995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.08.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we describe our process of changing language of the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer's disease and AD-related dementias Clinical Trials Collaboratory (NIA IMPACT Collaboratory) "Stakeholder Engagement Team" to "Engaging Partners Team" in response to feedback from community partners regarding the problematic connotations of the term "stakeholder." We present a brief history of the term "stakeholder" and its use in clinical and community-engaged research. Then, we summarize critiques of this term, including its colonial history and potential to reinforce complacency with generational traumas, particularly among Indigenous peoples and communities. We conclude with a detailed overview of our team and organization's multi-step process to discontinue use of the term "stakeholder," in alignment with a theoretical model of organizational behavior change. This paper highlights the importance of critically evaluating language and responding to community partners. We hope our process can guide other researchers and organizations.

从 NIA IMPACT 协作参与伙伴团队中取消 "利益相关者 "一词:一个组织语言变化过程的实例。
在本文中,我们介绍了美国国家老龄化研究所嵌入式实用阿尔茨海默病和与阿尔茨海默病相关的痴呆症临床试验协作组(NIA IMPACT Collaboratory)将 "利益相关者参与团队 "改为 "参与合作伙伴团队 "的过程,以回应社区合作伙伴对 "利益相关者 "一词存在问题内涵的反馈意见。我们简要介绍了 "利益相关者 "一词的历史及其在临床和社区参与式研究中的使用。然后,我们总结了对这一术语的批评,包括其殖民历史以及对世代创伤的自满情绪,特别是在土著人民和社区中。最后,我们详细概述了我们团队和组织为停止使用 "利益相关者 "一词而采取的多步骤过程,该过程与组织行为改变的理论模型相一致。本文强调了批判性评估语言和回应社区合作伙伴的重要性。我们希望我们的过程能够为其他研究人员和组织提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信