Ecological assessment of unilateral spatial neglect in immersive virtual reality: A multiple-case study to assess the feasibility and relevance of a Baking Tray Task.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Marine Gaffard, Clémence Bourlon, Tristan-Gael Bara, Tifanie Bouchara, Florence Colle, Silvia Silvestri, Perrine Quentin, Alma Guilbert
{"title":"Ecological assessment of unilateral spatial neglect in immersive virtual reality: A multiple-case study to assess the feasibility and relevance of a Baking Tray Task.","authors":"Marine Gaffard, Clémence Bourlon, Tristan-Gael Bara, Tifanie Bouchara, Florence Colle, Silvia Silvestri, Perrine Quentin, Alma Guilbert","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2024.2394527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) primarily relies on paper-and-pencil tests, which do not fully represent daily life difficulties. To address this limitation, ecological tests, like the Baking Tray Test (BTT), have been developed. However, the original BTT identifies the presence of USN without providing information on its severity. In this aim, a new severity measure, the Centre of Mass (CoM), has been proposed, but its calculation in real environments poses challenges. Immersive virtual reality (VR) offers a promising solution for implementing a BTT in which measures are automatically calculated. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and relevance of an immersive VR BTT. Nineteen right brain-damaged patients with and without USN and 25 healthy participants were included. Group analyses showed an equivalence between the two BTT versions. Individual analyses revealed that all USN patients, except one, had pathological results in both versions. They also underlined pathological scores in patients without USN signs on paper-and-pencil tests. Finally, the CoM strongly correlated with paper-and-pencil tests and appeared to be a good indicator of USN severity. These findings support the relevance of implementing the BTT in an immersive VR version, suggesting its potential to enhance USN assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2394527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) primarily relies on paper-and-pencil tests, which do not fully represent daily life difficulties. To address this limitation, ecological tests, like the Baking Tray Test (BTT), have been developed. However, the original BTT identifies the presence of USN without providing information on its severity. In this aim, a new severity measure, the Centre of Mass (CoM), has been proposed, but its calculation in real environments poses challenges. Immersive virtual reality (VR) offers a promising solution for implementing a BTT in which measures are automatically calculated. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and relevance of an immersive VR BTT. Nineteen right brain-damaged patients with and without USN and 25 healthy participants were included. Group analyses showed an equivalence between the two BTT versions. Individual analyses revealed that all USN patients, except one, had pathological results in both versions. They also underlined pathological scores in patients without USN signs on paper-and-pencil tests. Finally, the CoM strongly correlated with paper-and-pencil tests and appeared to be a good indicator of USN severity. These findings support the relevance of implementing the BTT in an immersive VR version, suggesting its potential to enhance USN assessment.

沉浸式虚拟现实中单侧空间忽略的生态评估:多案例研究,评估烘烤托盘任务的可行性和相关性。
对单侧空间忽略(USN)的评估主要依赖于纸笔测验,而纸笔测验并不能完全反映日常生活中的困难。为了解决这一局限性,人们开发了生态测试,如烘烤盘测试(BTT)。然而,最初的 BTT 仅能识别是否存在 USN,却不能提供其严重程度的信息。为此,有人提出了一种新的严重程度测量方法--质量中心(CoM),但在真实环境中计算该方法却面临挑战。身临其境的虚拟现实(VR)为实施可自动计算测量值的 BTT 提供了一种很有前景的解决方案。本研究旨在评估沉浸式 VR BTT 的可行性和相关性。研究对象包括 19 名患有或未患有 USN 的右脑受损患者和 25 名健康参与者。群体分析表明,两个 BTT 版本之间具有等效性。个体分析表明,除一名患者外,所有 USN 患者在两个版本中都有病理结果。他们还强调了在纸笔测试中没有 USN 征兆的患者的病理得分。最后,CoM 与纸笔测验密切相关,似乎是 USN 严重程度的良好指标。这些研究结果证明了在身临其境的 VR 版本中实施 BTT 的相关性,表明其具有增强 USN 评估的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信