The Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Patients with Solid Tumors Differs Across Regions: A Systematic Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Maximilian Thormann, Hans-Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke, Julius Niehoff, Jan Robert Kröger, Ralf Gutzmer, Mareike Alter, Jan Borggrefe, Alexey Surov
{"title":"The Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Patients with Solid Tumors Differs Across Regions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Maximilian Thormann, Hans-Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke, Julius Niehoff, Jan Robert Kröger, Ralf Gutzmer, Mareike Alter, Jan Borggrefe, Alexey Surov","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2024.2401648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of the meta-analysis was to compare the prevalence of sarcopenia on staging computed tomography (CT) in patients with solid tumors in different world regions. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> MEDLINE, Embase, and SCOPUS literature databases were screened for prevalence of sarcopenia in oncologic patients up to December 2022. Two hundred eighty studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the involved studies was checked according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies instrument. <b>Results:</b> Two hundred eighty studies with 81,885 patients were included. The prevalence of sarcopenia among all patients was 35.5%. Prevalence of sarcopenia was higher in Europe (45.6%) and North America (41.2%) than in Asia (29.6%). Prevalence rates for the curative cohort were similar in all three regions, with 43.7% in Europe, 41.3% in North America, and 37.4% in Asia. In the palliative cohort, sarcopenia prevalence was higher in Europe (55.7%) and Asia (45.7%) than in North America (34.0%). In the European cohort, prostate cancer (73.9%), esophageal cancer (74.2%), pancreatic cancer (62.5%), and renal cell cancer (65.3%) showed high prevalence rates of sarcopenia. Applied cutoff values differed among regions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study shows that prevalence rates for sarcopenia of patients with solid tumors differ between regions and are different for curative and palliative settings. European studies demonstrate high prevalence rates for both settings. There is need for regional harmonization of sarcopenia definitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"102-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2401648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the meta-analysis was to compare the prevalence of sarcopenia on staging computed tomography (CT) in patients with solid tumors in different world regions. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and SCOPUS literature databases were screened for prevalence of sarcopenia in oncologic patients up to December 2022. Two hundred eighty studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the involved studies was checked according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies instrument. Results: Two hundred eighty studies with 81,885 patients were included. The prevalence of sarcopenia among all patients was 35.5%. Prevalence of sarcopenia was higher in Europe (45.6%) and North America (41.2%) than in Asia (29.6%). Prevalence rates for the curative cohort were similar in all three regions, with 43.7% in Europe, 41.3% in North America, and 37.4% in Asia. In the palliative cohort, sarcopenia prevalence was higher in Europe (55.7%) and Asia (45.7%) than in North America (34.0%). In the European cohort, prostate cancer (73.9%), esophageal cancer (74.2%), pancreatic cancer (62.5%), and renal cell cancer (65.3%) showed high prevalence rates of sarcopenia. Applied cutoff values differed among regions. Conclusion: Our study shows that prevalence rates for sarcopenia of patients with solid tumors differ between regions and are different for curative and palliative settings. European studies demonstrate high prevalence rates for both settings. There is need for regional harmonization of sarcopenia definitions.

不同地区实体瘤患者的 "肌肉疏松症 "患病率存在差异:系统回顾
研究目的荟萃分析的目的是比较世界不同地区实体瘤患者分期计算机断层扫描(CT)中肌少症的发生率。材料与方法:在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 SCOPUS 文献数据库中筛选了截至 2022 年 12 月肿瘤患者肌肉疏松症的患病率。共有 280 项研究符合纳入标准。根据诊断性研究质量评估工具检查了相关研究的方法学质量。结果共纳入 280 项研究,涉及 81,885 名患者。所有患者中肌肉疏松症的发病率为 35.5%。欧洲(45.6%)和北美(41.2%)的肌肉疏松症发病率高于亚洲(29.6%)。三个地区的治疗组群患病率相似,欧洲为 43.7%,北美为 41.3%,亚洲为 37.4%。在姑息治疗队列中,欧洲(55.7%)和亚洲(45.7%)的肌肉疏松症患病率高于北美(34.0%)。在欧洲队列中,前列腺癌(73.9%)、食道癌(74.2%)、胰腺癌(62.5%)和肾细胞癌(65.3%)的肌肉疏松症发病率较高。不同地区采用的临界值有所不同。结论:我们的研究表明,实体瘤患者的肌肉疏松症患病率因地区而异,治疗和姑息治疗的患病率也不同。欧洲的研究显示这两种情况下的患病率都很高。各地区有必要统一肌少症的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信