Dingjing Shi, Alexander P Christensen, Eric Anthony Day, Hudson F Golino, Luis Eduardo Garrido
{"title":"Exploring Estimation Procedures for Reducing Dimensionality in Psychological Network Modeling.","authors":"Dingjing Shi, Alexander P Christensen, Eric Anthony Day, Hudson F Golino, Luis Eduardo Garrido","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2024.2395941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To understand psychological data, it is crucial to examine the structure and dimensions of variables. In this study, we examined alternative estimation algorithms to the conventional GLASSO-based exploratory graph analysis (EGA) in network psychometric models to assess the dimensionality structure of the data. The study applied Bayesian conjugate or Jeffreys' priors to estimate the graphical structure and then used the Louvain community detection algorithm to partition and identify groups of nodes, which allowed the detection of the multi- and unidimensional factor structures. Monte Carlo simulations suggested that the two alternative Bayesian estimation algorithms had comparable or better performance when compared with the GLASSO-based EGA and conventional parallel analysis (PA). When estimating the multidimensional factor structure, the analytically based method (i.e., EGA.analytical) showed the best balance between accuracy and mean biased/absolute errors, with the highest accuracy tied with EGA but with the smallest errors. The sampling-based approach (EGA.sampling) yielded higher accuracy and smaller errors than PA; lower accuracy but also lower errors than EGA. Techniques from the two algorithms had more stable performance than EGA and PA across different data conditions. When estimating the unidimensional structure, the PA technique performed the best, followed closely by EGA, and then EGA.analytical and EGA.sampling. Furthermore, the study explored four full Bayesian techniques to assess dimensionality in network psychometrics. The results demonstrated superior performance when using Bayesian hypothesis testing or deriving posterior samples of graph structures under small sample sizes. The study recommends using the EGA.analytical technique as an alternative tool for assessing dimensionality and advocates for the usefulness of the EGA.sampling method as a valuable alternate technique. The findings also indicated encouraging results for extending the regularization-based network modeling EGA method to the Bayesian framework and discussed future directions in this line of work. The study illustrated the practical application of the techniques to two empirical examples in R.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2024.2395941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To understand psychological data, it is crucial to examine the structure and dimensions of variables. In this study, we examined alternative estimation algorithms to the conventional GLASSO-based exploratory graph analysis (EGA) in network psychometric models to assess the dimensionality structure of the data. The study applied Bayesian conjugate or Jeffreys' priors to estimate the graphical structure and then used the Louvain community detection algorithm to partition and identify groups of nodes, which allowed the detection of the multi- and unidimensional factor structures. Monte Carlo simulations suggested that the two alternative Bayesian estimation algorithms had comparable or better performance when compared with the GLASSO-based EGA and conventional parallel analysis (PA). When estimating the multidimensional factor structure, the analytically based method (i.e., EGA.analytical) showed the best balance between accuracy and mean biased/absolute errors, with the highest accuracy tied with EGA but with the smallest errors. The sampling-based approach (EGA.sampling) yielded higher accuracy and smaller errors than PA; lower accuracy but also lower errors than EGA. Techniques from the two algorithms had more stable performance than EGA and PA across different data conditions. When estimating the unidimensional structure, the PA technique performed the best, followed closely by EGA, and then EGA.analytical and EGA.sampling. Furthermore, the study explored four full Bayesian techniques to assess dimensionality in network psychometrics. The results demonstrated superior performance when using Bayesian hypothesis testing or deriving posterior samples of graph structures under small sample sizes. The study recommends using the EGA.analytical technique as an alternative tool for assessing dimensionality and advocates for the usefulness of the EGA.sampling method as a valuable alternate technique. The findings also indicated encouraging results for extending the regularization-based network modeling EGA method to the Bayesian framework and discussed future directions in this line of work. The study illustrated the practical application of the techniques to two empirical examples in R.
要理解心理数据,研究变量的结构和维度至关重要。在本研究中,我们研究了网络心理测量模型中基于传统 GLASSO 的探索性图分析(EGA)的替代估计算法,以评估数据的维度结构。研究采用贝叶斯共轭或杰弗里斯先验来估计图结构,然后使用卢万群落检测算法来划分和识别节点群,从而检测出多维和单维因子结构。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,与基于 GLASSO 的 EGA 和传统的并行分析(PA)相比,这两种贝叶斯估计算法的性能相当或更好。在估计多维因子结构时,基于分析的方法(即 EGA.analytical)在准确性和平均偏差/绝对误差之间表现出最佳平衡,准确性与 EGA 并列最高,但误差最小。与 PA 相比,基于采样的方法(EGA.采样)精度更高,误差更小;与 EGA 相比,精度较低,但误差也较小。在不同的数据条件下,这两种算法的技术比 EGA 和 PA 具有更稳定的性能。在估计单维结构时,PA 技术表现最好,紧随其后的是 EGA,然后是 EGA.分析和 EGA.采样。此外,研究还探索了四种完整的贝叶斯技术,以评估网络心理测量学中的维度。结果表明,在样本量较小的情况下,使用贝叶斯假设检验或推导图结构的后验样本时,效果更佳。研究建议使用 EGA.分析技术作为评估维度的替代工具,并主张将 EGA.抽样方法作为一种有价值的替代技术。研究结果还表明,将基于正则化的网络建模 EGA 方法扩展到贝叶斯框架取得了令人鼓舞的成果,并讨论了这一工作领域的未来方向。该研究以 R 语言中的两个经验实例说明了这些技术的实际应用。
期刊介绍:
Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.