Women's Lived Experiences in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Breast Cancer Management: A Phenomenological Study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Juliana Christina, Wendy Abigail, Anita De Bellis, Ann Harrington
{"title":"Women's Lived Experiences in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Breast Cancer Management: A Phenomenological Study.","authors":"Juliana Christina, Wendy Abigail, Anita De Bellis, Ann Harrington","doi":"10.1177/08980101241277680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore women with breast cancer (WBC) lived experiences on the use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for breast cancer management. van Manen's phenomenology of practice was used as the methodology and method in this study. In-depth interviews guided by semi-structured questions were conducted with 21 WBC recruited using convenience sampling. The thematic analysis generated four main themes: Access, affordability and support for medical treatment, beliefs in CAM treatment, feeling the potential benefits of CAM, and Acknowledging the negative aspects of CAM. The outcomes from using CAM based on the lived experiences of WBC indicated that some CAM treatments could improve quality of life. However, some fraudulent CAM obtained from unprofessional CAM providers could cause harmful effects, delay medical cancer treatment, and increase breast cancer treatment costs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enhance the awareness of appropriate treatment, including evidence-based CAM, for WBC. Improved understanding in the use of CAM as a part of quality breast cancer care services could contribute to increasing the quality of life and survival rates of women with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101241277680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101241277680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore women with breast cancer (WBC) lived experiences on the use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for breast cancer management. van Manen's phenomenology of practice was used as the methodology and method in this study. In-depth interviews guided by semi-structured questions were conducted with 21 WBC recruited using convenience sampling. The thematic analysis generated four main themes: Access, affordability and support for medical treatment, beliefs in CAM treatment, feeling the potential benefits of CAM, and Acknowledging the negative aspects of CAM. The outcomes from using CAM based on the lived experiences of WBC indicated that some CAM treatments could improve quality of life. However, some fraudulent CAM obtained from unprofessional CAM providers could cause harmful effects, delay medical cancer treatment, and increase breast cancer treatment costs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enhance the awareness of appropriate treatment, including evidence-based CAM, for WBC. Improved understanding in the use of CAM as a part of quality breast cancer care services could contribute to increasing the quality of life and survival rates of women with breast cancer.

妇女使用补充和替代医学治疗乳腺癌的生活经历:现象学研究。
本研究旨在探讨患有乳腺癌的妇女(WBC)在使用补充和替代医学(CAM)治疗乳腺癌方面的生活经验。本研究采用 van Manen 的实践现象学作为研究方法和手段。在半结构化问题的指导下,采用便利抽样法对 21 名乳腺癌患者进行了深入访谈。专题分析产生了四个主要专题:获得医疗的途径、负担能力和支持;对 CAM 治疗的信念;感受到 CAM 的潜在益处;以及承认 CAM 的负面影响。根据 WBC 的生活经验,使用 CAM 的结果表明,一些 CAM 治疗可以提高生活质量。然而,一些从不具专业水平的医疗服务提供者那里获得的虚假疗法可能会造成有害影响,延误癌症的医学治疗,并增加乳腺癌的治疗费用。因此,亟需提高乳腺癌患者对适当治疗的认识,包括以证据为基础的 CAM。提高对使用 CAM 作为优质乳腺癌护理服务一部分的认识,有助于提高乳腺癌妇女的生活质量和存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信