Defining minimum workforce standards for intensive care physiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand: A Dephi study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Peter Thomas, Wendy Chaseling, Leanne Marais, Claire Matheson, Michelle Paton, Nelmari Swanepoel
{"title":"Defining minimum workforce standards for intensive care physiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand: A Dephi study.","authors":"Peter Thomas, Wendy Chaseling, Leanne Marais, Claire Matheson, Michelle Paton, Nelmari Swanepoel","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care staffing guidelines provide recommendations for the safe and effective delivery of health care while recognising professional requirements of the workforce. To guide recommendations for physiotherapy staffing guidelines, profession-specific consultation is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based recommendations for minimum workforce standards for physiotherapy in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi survey process was conducted involving physiotherapists from Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel consisted of 65 physiotherapists in the first round and 60 in the second round (92% retention). Respondents were from both Australia (49, 76%) and New Zealand (16, 24%) who had been physiotherapists for an average of 18.8 ± 9.0 years and were primarily senior intensive care physiotherapists (44, 68%). Respondents had experience across level 3 (50, 77%), level 2 (18, 28%), and level 1 (5, 8%) adult intensive care units (ICUs), adult high-dependency units (27, 42%), and paediatric intensive care (6, 9%). A total of 42 statements were presented, with 37 reaching consensus after two rounds. After two rounds, consensus was achieved for a minimum staffing ratio in paediatric ICUs of one physiotherapist per six (1:6) beds. For adult ICUs, use of the median value of the participant's responses was supported to establish minimum staffing ratios of 1:8, 1:7, 1:6, and 1:8 for levels 1, 2, and 3 ICUs and high-dependency units, respectively. The requirement for an additional allocation for senior physiotherapist staffing for each ICU level was also established. Statements that also gained consensus included recommendations for access to on-call and weekend services for all ICU settings and the consideration of evening shifts specifically for level 3 and paediatric ICUs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendations for minimum staffing for physiotherapy in intensive care settings were achieved and supported requirements for clinical service delivery, supervision, and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.08.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care staffing guidelines provide recommendations for the safe and effective delivery of health care while recognising professional requirements of the workforce. To guide recommendations for physiotherapy staffing guidelines, profession-specific consultation is needed.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based recommendations for minimum workforce standards for physiotherapy in intensive care.

Methods: A Delphi survey process was conducted involving physiotherapists from Australia and New Zealand.

Results: The panel consisted of 65 physiotherapists in the first round and 60 in the second round (92% retention). Respondents were from both Australia (49, 76%) and New Zealand (16, 24%) who had been physiotherapists for an average of 18.8 ± 9.0 years and were primarily senior intensive care physiotherapists (44, 68%). Respondents had experience across level 3 (50, 77%), level 2 (18, 28%), and level 1 (5, 8%) adult intensive care units (ICUs), adult high-dependency units (27, 42%), and paediatric intensive care (6, 9%). A total of 42 statements were presented, with 37 reaching consensus after two rounds. After two rounds, consensus was achieved for a minimum staffing ratio in paediatric ICUs of one physiotherapist per six (1:6) beds. For adult ICUs, use of the median value of the participant's responses was supported to establish minimum staffing ratios of 1:8, 1:7, 1:6, and 1:8 for levels 1, 2, and 3 ICUs and high-dependency units, respectively. The requirement for an additional allocation for senior physiotherapist staffing for each ICU level was also established. Statements that also gained consensus included recommendations for access to on-call and weekend services for all ICU settings and the consideration of evening shifts specifically for level 3 and paediatric ICUs.

Conclusions: Recommendations for minimum staffing for physiotherapy in intensive care settings were achieved and supported requirements for clinical service delivery, supervision, and training.

确定澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护物理治疗的最低劳动力标准:Dephi 研究。
背景:重症监护人员配置指南为安全有效地提供医疗服务提供了建议,同时也承认了工作人员的专业要求。为指导物理治疗人员配备指南的建议,需要进行专业咨询:本研究的目的是为重症监护中的物理治疗最低人力标准制定基于共识的建议:方法:对澳大利亚和新西兰的物理治疗师进行德尔菲调查:调查小组第一轮由 65 名物理治疗师组成,第二轮由 60 名物理治疗师组成(保留率为 92%)。受访者分别来自澳大利亚(49 人,占 76%)和新西兰(16 人,占 24%),他们平均从事物理治疗师工作 18.8 ± 9.0 年,主要是高级重症监护物理治疗师(44 人,占 68%)。受访者在三级(50 人,占 77%)、二级(18 人,占 28%)和一级(5 人,占 8%)成人重症监护病房(ICU)、成人高度依赖病房(27 人,占 42%)和儿科重症监护病房(6 人,占 9%)工作过。共提交了 42 份声明,其中 37 份在两轮讨论后达成了共识。经过两轮讨论,就儿科重症监护病房的最低人员配备比例达成共识,即每六张病床配备一名物理治疗师(1:6)。对于成人重症监护病房,支持使用参与者回答的中值来确定 1 级、2 级和 3 级重症监护病房以及高度依赖病房的最低人员配置比例,分别为 1:8、1:7、1:6 和 1:8。会议还确定了为每一级重症监护病房增配高级物理治疗师的要求。获得共识的声明还包括建议在所有 ICU 环境中提供随叫随到和周末服务,以及考虑专门为 3 级和儿科 ICU 设置晚班:结论:重症监护环境中物理治疗的最低人员配备建议已经达成,并支持对临床服务提供、监督和培训的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信