Sex talks-experiences with and barriers to communication about sexuality with healthcare staff among patients with anxiety disorder in Denmark.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Gert Martin Hald, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, Agnieszka Heymann-Szlachcinska, Mette Øllgaard, Clas Winding, Dorrit Dilling-Hansen, Selma Lind Kruse, Mette Frøslev, Hanne Larsen, Pia Aaron Skovby Andersen, Nanna Scherfig Straarup, Jenna Marie Strizzi
{"title":"Sex talks-experiences with and barriers to communication about sexuality with healthcare staff among patients with anxiety disorder in Denmark.","authors":"Gert Martin Hald, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, Agnieszka Heymann-Szlachcinska, Mette Øllgaard, Clas Winding, Dorrit Dilling-Hansen, Selma Lind Kruse, Mette Frøslev, Hanne Larsen, Pia Aaron Skovby Andersen, Nanna Scherfig Straarup, Jenna Marie Strizzi","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research among diverse patient populations suggests that healthcare staff routinely do not talk about sexuality with their patients even when such talks are highly indicated and relevant.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study we sought to investigate how patients at outpatient anxiety clinics in Denmark experience sexual communication with healthcare staff and what barriers they encounter in this connection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a survey design from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019. In collaboration with 11 outpatient anxiety clinics in Denmark, patients with a primary diagnosis of panic disorder, social phobia, generalized anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder were invited to participate in the study. The final sample included 272 patients. Survey questions were related to sociodemographic characteristics, sexual activity and dysfunctions, pharmacological treatment adherence, anxiety and depression symptoms, and experience with and barriers to sexual communication. For each participant, clinicians at the clinics provided the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnostic codes, medications, and dosage. Study inclusion criteria were not having an organic disorder that may cause anxiety, not having a previous diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder or schizophrenia, and the ability to speak and read Danish.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes included patients' experiences with and barriers to sexual communication with healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 61% of the patients in this sample group found it relevant to talk to healthcare staff about sexuality but only 28% of the study patients had done so, of whom 83% reported this communication to be a positive experience. The most frequently reported patient barriers to communication with healthcare professionals regarding sexual concerns were a belief that if sexual matters were relevant, the healthcare staff would bring it up (94%), fear of transgressing their own boundaries (94%), embarrassment (92%), and lack of knowledge as to how to start a conversation about sex (91%).</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The study results indicated a need for healthcare staff to routinely map out and address sexual matters in their clinical work with anxiety patients while bearing in mind the common patient barriers for this topic.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This study included a large clinical outpatient sample of anxiety patients and an extensive survey. However, the results may not be generalizable across all anxiety patients or patients in general.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study strongly indicate that a majority of anxiety patients find it both relevant and beneficial to discuss sexual matters with healthcare staff in connection with their anxiety treatment, and therefore healthcare staff should be educated and equipped to routinely address these matters while bearing in mind the most common patient barriers for conversations about sexuality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research among diverse patient populations suggests that healthcare staff routinely do not talk about sexuality with their patients even when such talks are highly indicated and relevant.

Aim: In this study we sought to investigate how patients at outpatient anxiety clinics in Denmark experience sexual communication with healthcare staff and what barriers they encounter in this connection.

Methods: We employed a survey design from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019. In collaboration with 11 outpatient anxiety clinics in Denmark, patients with a primary diagnosis of panic disorder, social phobia, generalized anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder were invited to participate in the study. The final sample included 272 patients. Survey questions were related to sociodemographic characteristics, sexual activity and dysfunctions, pharmacological treatment adherence, anxiety and depression symptoms, and experience with and barriers to sexual communication. For each participant, clinicians at the clinics provided the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnostic codes, medications, and dosage. Study inclusion criteria were not having an organic disorder that may cause anxiety, not having a previous diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder or schizophrenia, and the ability to speak and read Danish.

Outcomes: Outcomes included patients' experiences with and barriers to sexual communication with healthcare staff.

Results: In total, 61% of the patients in this sample group found it relevant to talk to healthcare staff about sexuality but only 28% of the study patients had done so, of whom 83% reported this communication to be a positive experience. The most frequently reported patient barriers to communication with healthcare professionals regarding sexual concerns were a belief that if sexual matters were relevant, the healthcare staff would bring it up (94%), fear of transgressing their own boundaries (94%), embarrassment (92%), and lack of knowledge as to how to start a conversation about sex (91%).

Clinical implications: The study results indicated a need for healthcare staff to routinely map out and address sexual matters in their clinical work with anxiety patients while bearing in mind the common patient barriers for this topic.

Strengths and limitations: This study included a large clinical outpatient sample of anxiety patients and an extensive survey. However, the results may not be generalizable across all anxiety patients or patients in general.

Conclusion: The results of this study strongly indicate that a majority of anxiety patients find it both relevant and beneficial to discuss sexual matters with healthcare staff in connection with their anxiety treatment, and therefore healthcare staff should be educated and equipped to routinely address these matters while bearing in mind the most common patient barriers for conversations about sexuality.

性谈话--丹麦焦虑症患者与医护人员进行性交流的经历和障碍。
背景:以前在不同患者群体中进行的研究表明,医护人员通常不会与患者谈论性问题,即使这种谈论具有很强的针对性和相关性。目的:在这项研究中,我们试图调查丹麦焦虑症门诊患者如何与医护人员进行性交流,以及他们在这方面遇到了哪些障碍:我们采用了调查设计,调查时间为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日。我们与丹麦的 11 家焦虑症门诊合作,邀请主要诊断为恐慌症、社交恐惧症、广泛性焦虑症或强迫症的患者参与研究。最终样本包括 272 名患者。调查问题涉及社会人口特征、性活动和性功能障碍、药物治疗依从性、焦虑和抑郁症状以及性交流经验和障碍。诊所的临床医生为每位参与者提供了《国际疾病分类》第 10 版的诊断代码、药物和剂量。研究的纳入标准是没有可能导致焦虑的器质性疾病,以前没有被诊断为双相情感障碍或精神分裂症,并且能够说和读丹麦语:结果:结果包括患者与医护人员进行性交流的经历和障碍:在该样本组中,共有 61% 的患者认为与医护人员进行性交流是有意义的,但只有 28% 的研究患者进行过性交流,其中 83% 的患者表示这种交流是一种积极的体验。患者在与医护人员就性问题进行交流时最常遇到的障碍是:认为如果性问题与自己有关,医护人员就会提出来(94%)、害怕触犯自己的底线(94%)、尴尬(92%)以及不知道如何开始性话题(91%):研究结果表明,医护人员有必要在与焦虑症患者的临床工作中定期规划并解决性问题,同时牢记患者在此话题上的常见障碍:本研究包括大量焦虑症患者的临床门诊样本和广泛的调查。然而,研究结果可能无法推广至所有焦虑症患者或一般患者:本研究的结果有力地表明,大多数焦虑症患者认为与医护人员讨论与焦虑症治疗相关的性问题既相关又有益,因此,医护人员应接受相关教育并做好准备,在牢记患者在性问题对话中最常见的障碍的同时,例行处理这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Journal of Sexual Medicine 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research. The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine. The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信