Cardiac Function and Functional Capacity in Patients With Long COVID: A Comparison to Propensity-Matched Community Controls

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thomas H. Marwick MBBS, PhD, MPH , Noah Wexler MBBS , Joel Smith MSc , Leah Wright PhD , Felicia Ho MBBS , Marc Oreto BSc , Ashleigh-Georgia Sherriff BSc , Richard Allwood BSc , Yusuke Sata MD, PhD , Stefano Manca PhD , Erin Howden PhD , Quan Huynh PhD
{"title":"Cardiac Function and Functional Capacity in Patients With Long COVID: A Comparison to Propensity-Matched Community Controls","authors":"Thomas H. Marwick MBBS, PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Noah Wexler MBBS ,&nbsp;Joel Smith MSc ,&nbsp;Leah Wright PhD ,&nbsp;Felicia Ho MBBS ,&nbsp;Marc Oreto BSc ,&nbsp;Ashleigh-Georgia Sherriff BSc ,&nbsp;Richard Allwood BSc ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sata MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stefano Manca PhD ,&nbsp;Erin Howden PhD ,&nbsp;Quan Huynh PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac impairment has been associated with acute COVID-19 since the earliest reports of the pandemic. However, its role in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (“long COVID”) is undefined, and many existing observations about cardiovascular involvement in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 are uncontrolled.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in patients with long COVID and noninfected controls from the same community and explore their association with functional capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Echocardiography was used to assess cardiac structure and function, including the measurement of global longitudinal strain (GLS), in 190 participants with long COVID. All underwent assessment of functional impairment by subjective (Duke Activity Status Index) and objective tests (6-minute walk test). The 190 participants from the long COVID group were matched with those from 979 patients who underwent the same tests in the pre-COVID-19 era, using a propensity score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 190 patients with long COVID had similar age and risk factor profiles to those of their matched controls. Left ventricular dimensions and geometry, but not diastolic parameters, were significantly altered in the long COVID group. The long COVID group had subclinical systolic dysfunction (GLS 18.5% ± 2.6% vs 19.3% ± 2.7%, <em>P</em> = .005), and more long COVID patients had abnormal (&lt;16%) GLS (13% vs 8%, <em>P</em> = .035). The association of long COVID with abnormal GLS (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.04, 2.45]) was independent of—and had a similar or greater effect size than—age and risk factors. There was no interaction of long COVID with the association of risk factors with GLS. As expected, the long COVID group had significant subjective (&lt;85% predicted METS; 72% vs 5%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and objective functional impairment (29% vs 24%, <em>P</em> = .026), but GLS was only weakly associated with both subjective (<em>r</em> = 0.30, <em>P</em> = .005) and objective (<em>r</em> = 0.21, <em>P</em> = .05) functional impairment. The presence of long COVID was independently associated with subjective (odds ratio = 159.7 [95% CI, 61.6-414.2]) and objective functional impairment (odds ratio = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5-5.2]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Impaired GLS and left ventricular dimensions are the echocardiographic features that are overrepresented in long COVID, and this association is similar to and independent of other risk factors. Impaired GLS is weakly associated with functional impairment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":"38 1","pages":"Pages 16-23.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724004528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac impairment has been associated with acute COVID-19 since the earliest reports of the pandemic. However, its role in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (“long COVID”) is undefined, and many existing observations about cardiovascular involvement in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 are uncontrolled.

Objective

To compare the prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in patients with long COVID and noninfected controls from the same community and explore their association with functional capacity.

Methods

Echocardiography was used to assess cardiac structure and function, including the measurement of global longitudinal strain (GLS), in 190 participants with long COVID. All underwent assessment of functional impairment by subjective (Duke Activity Status Index) and objective tests (6-minute walk test). The 190 participants from the long COVID group were matched with those from 979 patients who underwent the same tests in the pre-COVID-19 era, using a propensity score.

Results

The 190 patients with long COVID had similar age and risk factor profiles to those of their matched controls. Left ventricular dimensions and geometry, but not diastolic parameters, were significantly altered in the long COVID group. The long COVID group had subclinical systolic dysfunction (GLS 18.5% ± 2.6% vs 19.3% ± 2.7%, P = .005), and more long COVID patients had abnormal (<16%) GLS (13% vs 8%, P = .035). The association of long COVID with abnormal GLS (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.04, 2.45]) was independent of—and had a similar or greater effect size than—age and risk factors. There was no interaction of long COVID with the association of risk factors with GLS. As expected, the long COVID group had significant subjective (<85% predicted METS; 72% vs 5%, P < .001) and objective functional impairment (29% vs 24%, P = .026), but GLS was only weakly associated with both subjective (r = 0.30, P = .005) and objective (r = 0.21, P = .05) functional impairment. The presence of long COVID was independently associated with subjective (odds ratio = 159.7 [95% CI, 61.6-414.2]) and objective functional impairment (odds ratio = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5-5.2]).

Conclusions

Impaired GLS and left ventricular dimensions are the echocardiographic features that are overrepresented in long COVID, and this association is similar to and independent of other risk factors. Impaired GLS is weakly associated with functional impairment.
长 COVID 患者的心功能和功能能力:与倾向匹配社区对照组的比较。
背景:自最早报道 COVID-19 大流行以来,急性 COVID-19 一直与心功能损害有关。然而,它在 COVID-19 急性后遗症(PASC,或称 "长 COVID")中的作用尚未确定,而且现有的许多关于心血管受 PASC 影响的观察结果也未得到控制:比较长COVID患者和同一社区非感染对照组的心功能障碍发生率,并探讨其与功能能力的关系:方法: 采用超声心动图评估190名长COVID患者的心脏结构和功能,包括测量总体纵向应变(GLS)。所有患者都通过主观测试(杜克活动状态指数,DASI)和客观测试(6 分钟步行测试,6MWT)对功能障碍进行了评估。长COVID组的190名患者与在前COVID-19时代接受相同测试的979名患者采用倾向评分法进行了配对:结果:190 名长 COVID 患者的年龄和风险因素特征与匹配对照组相似。长COVID组患者的左心室尺寸和几何形状发生了显著变化,但舒张期参数没有变化。长COVID组存在亚临床收缩功能障碍(GLS为18.5±2.6 vs 19.3±2.7%,P=0.005),更多的长COVID患者出现异常(结论:GLS和左心室尺寸受损是导致长COVID的主要原因):GLS和左心室尺寸受损是长COVID患者高发的超声心动图特征,这种关联与其他风险因素相似,且与其他风险因素无关。GLS受损与功能障碍关系不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信