Elaine Yu, Fernando Silva, Anna Lussier, Peter Lindholm
{"title":"Lung Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Pulse Oximetry and Respiratory Symptoms in the Diagnosis of Freediving-Induced Pulmonary Syndrome.","authors":"Elaine Yu, Fernando Silva, Anna Lussier, Peter Lindholm","doi":"10.1177/10806032241281463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>B-lines on lung ultrasound have been found in asymptomatic competitive breath-hold divers, but their significance and time to resolution are not well understood. We sought to investigate the relationship between B-lines, oxygen saturation, and respiratory symptoms after competitive dives to diagnose pulmonary injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed lung ultrasounds before (predive), immediately after (postdive), and within 1 h (follow-up) of a competitive dive. B-lines were counted in each intercostal space in the anterior, lateral, and posterior lung fields, and the highest number of B-lines within a space was recorded for each lung region. At follow-up, each diver's oxygen saturation and respiratory symptoms were recorded. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's correlation, and sensitivity and specificity calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four divers completed 143 individual dives of four different disciplines. The median number of B-lines was 0 (IQR inclusive=0) predive, 1 (IQR=3) postdive, and 0 (IQR=1) at follow-up. There was a significant difference in total B-lines between measurement times (<i>p</i><0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of hypoxemia, clinically significant B-lines, and both measures in tandem in detecting respiratory symptomatology were 52% and 76%, 24% and 92%, and 24% and 95%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>B-lines are a common phenomenon in competitive breath-hold divers on surfacing and decrease within 1 h, suggesting a physiologic fluid shift. B-lines are negatively correlated with oxygen saturation, indicating that extravascular fluid impairs gas exchange in the lung. Neither hypoxemia nor clinically significant B-lines were found to be reliable indicators for respiratory symptomatology, suggesting that there may be multiple phenotypes of freediving-induced pulmonary syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241281463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: B-lines on lung ultrasound have been found in asymptomatic competitive breath-hold divers, but their significance and time to resolution are not well understood. We sought to investigate the relationship between B-lines, oxygen saturation, and respiratory symptoms after competitive dives to diagnose pulmonary injury.
Methods: We performed lung ultrasounds before (predive), immediately after (postdive), and within 1 h (follow-up) of a competitive dive. B-lines were counted in each intercostal space in the anterior, lateral, and posterior lung fields, and the highest number of B-lines within a space was recorded for each lung region. At follow-up, each diver's oxygen saturation and respiratory symptoms were recorded. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's correlation, and sensitivity and specificity calculations.
Results: Forty-four divers completed 143 individual dives of four different disciplines. The median number of B-lines was 0 (IQR inclusive=0) predive, 1 (IQR=3) postdive, and 0 (IQR=1) at follow-up. There was a significant difference in total B-lines between measurement times (p<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of hypoxemia, clinically significant B-lines, and both measures in tandem in detecting respiratory symptomatology were 52% and 76%, 24% and 92%, and 24% and 95%, respectively.
Conclusions: B-lines are a common phenomenon in competitive breath-hold divers on surfacing and decrease within 1 h, suggesting a physiologic fluid shift. B-lines are negatively correlated with oxygen saturation, indicating that extravascular fluid impairs gas exchange in the lung. Neither hypoxemia nor clinically significant B-lines were found to be reliable indicators for respiratory symptomatology, suggesting that there may be multiple phenotypes of freediving-induced pulmonary syndrome.
简介:在无症状的竞技憋气潜水员中发现了肺部超声波上的 B 线,但其意义和解决时间尚不十分清楚。我们试图研究 B 线、血氧饱和度和竞技潜水后呼吸道症状之间的关系,以诊断肺损伤:我们在竞技潜水前(潜水前)、潜水后(潜水后)和潜水后 1 小时内(随访)分别进行了肺部超声波检查。在肺前区、肺侧区和肺后区的每个肋间隙计数 B 线,并记录每个肺区每个间隙内最高的 B 线数。随访时,记录每位潜水员的血氧饱和度和呼吸道症状。统计分析包括 Kruskal-Wallis 检验、Spearman 相关性以及敏感性和特异性计算:结果:44 名潜水员完成了 4 个不同项目的 143 次潜水。潜水前 B 线的中位数为 0(IQR=0),潜水后为 1(IQR=3),随访时为 0(IQR=1)。不同测量时间的 B 线总数存在明显差异(p 结论:B 线是竞技憋气潜水员浮出水面时的常见现象,并在 1 小时内减少,表明生理体液转移。B 线与血氧饱和度呈负相关,表明血管外液体影响了肺部的气体交换。研究发现,低氧血症和具有临床意义的 B 线都不是呼吸系统症状的可靠指标,这表明自由潜水引起的肺部综合征可能有多种表型。
期刊介绍:
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.