{"title":"Cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation in eating disorder patients with comorbid generalized anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms.","authors":"Connor J Thompson, Caitlin A Martin-Wagar","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2024.2405290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has found that difficulties in emotion regulation negatively impact mental health, whereas cognitive flexibility may promote stress resilience and positive mental health. Little is known about cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation in people with comorbid eating disorder (ED) and anxiety and stress disorders. A transdiagnostic ED population (<i>N</i> = 227) at an outpatient ED treatment facility completed several self-report instruments that measured cognitive flexibility, emotion regulation difficulties, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms upon admission. We investigated cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation differences for those with an ED without comorbidity and those with various combinations of comorbidity. In a one-way between-groups ANOVA, we investigated differences in cognitive flexibility for those with GAD, PTSD, neither, and both comorbidities. We found a statistically significant difference between these groups, with mean cognitive flexibility inventory scores being the lowest in the group with both comorbidities. However, when controlling for emotion regulation, a one-way between-groups ANCOVA indicated no significant differences in cognitive flexibility between comorbidity groups <i>F</i>(3, 222) = 1.20, <i>p</i> = .31 <i>Partial η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = .02. Though self-reported cognitive flexibility levels differ among ED patients with and without comorbidities, it appears that these differences are better explained by emotion regulation. Therefore, addressing emotion regulation early in treatment for all individuals with EDs, regardless of comorbidity, is recommended as a future research focus to enhance treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of treating emotion regulation on ED treatment engagement, dropout, and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2024.2405290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research has found that difficulties in emotion regulation negatively impact mental health, whereas cognitive flexibility may promote stress resilience and positive mental health. Little is known about cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation in people with comorbid eating disorder (ED) and anxiety and stress disorders. A transdiagnostic ED population (N = 227) at an outpatient ED treatment facility completed several self-report instruments that measured cognitive flexibility, emotion regulation difficulties, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms upon admission. We investigated cognitive flexibility and emotion regulation differences for those with an ED without comorbidity and those with various combinations of comorbidity. In a one-way between-groups ANOVA, we investigated differences in cognitive flexibility for those with GAD, PTSD, neither, and both comorbidities. We found a statistically significant difference between these groups, with mean cognitive flexibility inventory scores being the lowest in the group with both comorbidities. However, when controlling for emotion regulation, a one-way between-groups ANCOVA indicated no significant differences in cognitive flexibility between comorbidity groups F(3, 222) = 1.20, p = .31 Partial η2 = .02. Though self-reported cognitive flexibility levels differ among ED patients with and without comorbidities, it appears that these differences are better explained by emotion regulation. Therefore, addressing emotion regulation early in treatment for all individuals with EDs, regardless of comorbidity, is recommended as a future research focus to enhance treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of treating emotion regulation on ED treatment engagement, dropout, and effectiveness.
研究发现,情绪调节方面的困难会对心理健康产生负面影响,而认知灵活性则可促进压力复原力和积极的心理健康。人们对饮食失调症(ED)、焦虑症和应激障碍患者的认知灵活性和情绪调节能力知之甚少。在一家门诊ED治疗机构就诊的跨诊断ED人群(N = 227)在入院时完成了几项自我报告工具,测量了认知灵活性、情绪调节困难、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)症状。我们调查了无合并症的 ED 患者和有各种合并症的患者在认知灵活性和情绪调节方面的差异。在单向组间方差分析中,我们研究了患有 GAD、创伤后应激障碍、两者均无以及同时患有这三种合并症的患者在认知灵活性方面的差异。我们发现这些群体之间存在着显著的统计学差异,同时患有这两种疾病的群体的认知灵活性平均得分最低。然而,在控制情绪调节的情况下,单向组间方差分析表明,合并症组间的认知灵活性没有明显差异,F(3,222)= 1.20,P = .31 部分 η2 = .02。虽然有合并症和无合并症的 ED 患者自我报告的认知灵活性水平不同,但情绪调节似乎能更好地解释这些差异。因此,建议将在治疗早期对所有 ED 患者(无论是否有合并症)进行情绪调节作为未来研究的重点,以提高治疗效果。要了解情绪调节治疗对 ED 治疗参与度、辍学率和有效性的影响,还需要进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.