Added value of artificial intelligence solutions for arterial stenosis detection on head and neck CT angiography: A randomized crossover multi-reader multi-case study.
IF 4.9 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Added value of artificial intelligence solutions for arterial stenosis detection on head and neck CT angiography: A randomized crossover multi-reader multi-case study.","authors":"Kunhua Li, Yang Yang, Yongwei Yang, Qingrun Li, Lanqian Jiao, Ting Chen, Dajing Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for the detection of arterial stenosis (AS) on head and neck CT angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent head and neck CTA examinations at two hospitals were retrospectively included. CTA examinations were randomized into group 1 (without AI-washout-with AI) and group 2 (with AI-washout-without AI), and six readers (two radiology residents, two non-neuroradiologists, and two neuroradiologists) independently interpreted each CTA examination without and with AI solutions. Additionally, reading time was recorded for each patient. Digital subtraction angiography was used as the standard of reference. The diagnostic performance for AS at lesion and patient levels with four AS thresholds (30 %, 50 %, 70 %, and 100 %) was assessed by calculating sensitivity, false-positive lesions index (FPLI), specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 patients (169 men, 63.1 %) with a median age of 65 years (first quartile, 57; third quartile, 72; age range: 28-88 years) were included. At the lesion level, AI improved the sensitivity of all readers by 5.2 % for detecting AS ≥ 30 % (P < 0.001). Concurrently, AI reduced the FPLI of all readers and specifically neuroradiologists for detecting non-occlusive AS (all P < 0.05). At the patient level, AI improved the accuracy of all readers by 4.1 % (73.9 % [1189/1608] without AI vs. 78.0 % [1254/1608] with AI) (P < 0.001). Sensitivity for AS ≥ 30 % and the specificity for AS ≥ 70 % increased for all readers with AI assistance (P = 0.01). The median reading time for all readers was reduced from 268 s without AI to 241 s with AI (P< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-assisted diagnosis improves the performance of radiologists in detecting head and neck AS, and shortens reading time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.07.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for the detection of arterial stenosis (AS) on head and neck CT angiography (CTA).
Materials and methods: Patients who underwent head and neck CTA examinations at two hospitals were retrospectively included. CTA examinations were randomized into group 1 (without AI-washout-with AI) and group 2 (with AI-washout-without AI), and six readers (two radiology residents, two non-neuroradiologists, and two neuroradiologists) independently interpreted each CTA examination without and with AI solutions. Additionally, reading time was recorded for each patient. Digital subtraction angiography was used as the standard of reference. The diagnostic performance for AS at lesion and patient levels with four AS thresholds (30 %, 50 %, 70 %, and 100 %) was assessed by calculating sensitivity, false-positive lesions index (FPLI), specificity, and accuracy.
Results: A total of 268 patients (169 men, 63.1 %) with a median age of 65 years (first quartile, 57; third quartile, 72; age range: 28-88 years) were included. At the lesion level, AI improved the sensitivity of all readers by 5.2 % for detecting AS ≥ 30 % (P < 0.001). Concurrently, AI reduced the FPLI of all readers and specifically neuroradiologists for detecting non-occlusive AS (all P < 0.05). At the patient level, AI improved the accuracy of all readers by 4.1 % (73.9 % [1189/1608] without AI vs. 78.0 % [1254/1608] with AI) (P < 0.001). Sensitivity for AS ≥ 30 % and the specificity for AS ≥ 70 % increased for all readers with AI assistance (P = 0.01). The median reading time for all readers was reduced from 268 s without AI to 241 s with AI (P< 0.001).
Conclusion: AI-assisted diagnosis improves the performance of radiologists in detecting head and neck AS, and shortens reading time.
期刊介绍：
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English.
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
