What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Samantha H Cheng, Sebastien Costedoat, Eleanor J Sterling, Catherine Chamberlain, Arundhati Jagadish, Peter Lichtenthal, A Justin Nowakowski, Auset Taylor, Jen Tinsman, Steven W J Canty, Margaret B Holland, Kelly W Jones, Morena Mills, David Morales-Hidalgo, Starry Sprenkle-Hyppolite, Meredith Wiggins, Michael B Mascia, Carlos L Muñoz Brenes
{"title":"What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol.","authors":"Samantha H Cheng, Sebastien Costedoat, Eleanor J Sterling, Catherine Chamberlain, Arundhati Jagadish, Peter Lichtenthal, A Justin Nowakowski, Auset Taylor, Jen Tinsman, Steven W J Canty, Margaret B Holland, Kelly W Jones, Morena Mills, David Morales-Hidalgo, Starry Sprenkle-Hyppolite, Meredith Wiggins, Michael B Mascia, Carlos L Muñoz Brenes","doi":"10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed.

Methods: To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access.

有哪些证据表明亚热带和热带陆地地区的自然气候解决方案与气候变化减缓成果之间存在联系?系统地图协议。
背景:自然气候解决方案(NCS)--保护、恢复和改造自然生态系统和改造生态系统以增加碳储存或避免温室气体(GHG)排放的行动--正日益被视为减缓气候变化的重要途径,同时也有助于我们的全球保护工作、整体地球复原力和可持续发展目标。最近,有预测认为,陆地非碳氢化合物有可能每年捕获或避免至少 11 千兆吨(千兆吨)二氧化碳当量的排放,或大约相当于到 2030 年实现《巴黎气候协定》目标所需的减排量的三分之一。非碳氢化合物干预措施还旨在提供共同效益,如通过可持续自然资源管理提高生产力和改善生计、保护具有地方和文化重要性的自然区域以及下游气候适应效益。在全球和国家议程中,人们越来越关注通过实施非监控措施来应对气候变化--然而,对于哪些类型的非监控措施已经进行了大量研究,哪些类型的非监控措施还需要更多证据,目前还缺乏明确的认识。本研究旨在绘制一张系统地图,以整理和描述热带和亚热带陆地生态系统中非监控措施与气候变化减缓结果之间联系的证据的现状、分布情况和所用方法。这项研究的结果可用于为计划和政策设计提供信息,并强调未来需要评估、研究和综合的关键知识缺口:为绘制该系统地图,我们将搜索两个书目数据库(包括 11 个索引)和 67 个组织网站,从 39 个现有证据综述中追溯引文,并向关键信息提供者征集信息。所有搜索将以英语进行,涵盖亚热带和热带陆地生态系统(森林、草原、红树林、农业区)。搜索结果将在标题、摘要和全文层面进行筛选,并记录排除文章的数量和排除原因。将对收录文章中的关键元数据进行编码,并在叙述性综述中进行报告,该综述将总结证据基础的趋势,评估知识差距,并为政策、实践和研究提供见解。该系统地图的数据将开放供查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信