The relationship between self-efficacy and sustainable Lean management systems within the healthcare arena.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Erin L Geiselman, Susan M Hendricks, Constance F Swenty
{"title":"The relationship between self-efficacy and sustainable Lean management systems within the healthcare arena.","authors":"Erin L Geiselman, Susan M Hendricks, Constance F Swenty","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-02-2024-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of the social contexts of sustainable Lean culture in healthcare by examining self-efficacy (SE) as a fundamental construct related to the value of perceived readiness, prior education of Lean and the importance of leadership's system-level support.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A descriptive correlational study was conducted to identify the relationships between SE and Lean readiness factors, SE and prior Lean training, SE and clinical vs administrative roles and SE and perceived system-level support in a large health system.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in self-reported readiness to use Lean tools between individuals who had received Lean training during their academic education and those who had not; however, their level of education did not impact SE. Lastly, and perhaps most important, the learner who embodies SE also has system-level support.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>Future directions of this research, in addition to assessing team readiness as other studies suggest, would be to evaluate individual team member readiness by gauging SE and addressing deficits prior to the deployment of process improvement (PI) projects to promote success and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>This contributes to the ongoing scholarship of Lean management systems, providing clinical and non-clinical leaders with a contextual understanding of their supportive role in the SE of teams.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study demonstrates the value of understanding SE of individual team members and how it can contribute to overall improved team outcomes, directly impacting the sustainability of Lean change culture and its promotion of improved patient safety, cost efficiencies and access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2024-0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of the social contexts of sustainable Lean culture in healthcare by examining self-efficacy (SE) as a fundamental construct related to the value of perceived readiness, prior education of Lean and the importance of leadership's system-level support.

Design/methodology/approach: A descriptive correlational study was conducted to identify the relationships between SE and Lean readiness factors, SE and prior Lean training, SE and clinical vs administrative roles and SE and perceived system-level support in a large health system.

Findings: There was a statistically significant difference in self-reported readiness to use Lean tools between individuals who had received Lean training during their academic education and those who had not; however, their level of education did not impact SE. Lastly, and perhaps most important, the learner who embodies SE also has system-level support.

Research limitations/implications: Future directions of this research, in addition to assessing team readiness as other studies suggest, would be to evaluate individual team member readiness by gauging SE and addressing deficits prior to the deployment of process improvement (PI) projects to promote success and sustainability.

Practical implications: This contributes to the ongoing scholarship of Lean management systems, providing clinical and non-clinical leaders with a contextual understanding of their supportive role in the SE of teams.

Originality/value: This study demonstrates the value of understanding SE of individual team members and how it can contribute to overall improved team outcomes, directly impacting the sustainability of Lean change culture and its promotion of improved patient safety, cost efficiencies and access to care.

自我效能感与医疗领域可持续精益管理系统之间的关系。
目的:本文旨在通过研究自我效能(SE)这一基本概念与感知准备程度、先前精益教育的价值以及领导层系统级支持的重要性之间的关系,加深对医疗保健领域可持续精益文化的社会背景的理解:我们进行了一项描述性相关研究,以确定 SE 与精益准备因素、SE 与之前的精益培训、SE 与临床与行政角色、SE 与在大型医疗系统中感知到的系统级支持之间的关系:在学术教育期间接受过精益培训的人与未接受过精益培训的人之间,在自我报告的精益工具使用准备程度上存在着统计学上的显著差异;然而,他们的教育水平并不影响 SE。最后,或许也是最重要的一点是,体现 SE 的学习者也会得到系统层面的支持:本研究的未来方向,除了像其他研究建议的那样评估团队的准备情况外,还将评估团队成员个人的准备情况,在部署流程改进(PI)项目之前衡量 SE 并解决不足之处,以促进成功和可持续性:原创性/价值:本研究为精益管理系统的持续学术研究做出了贡献,让临床和非临床领导者了解了他们在团队 SE 中的支持作用:本研究证明了了解团队成员个人 SE 的价值,以及它如何促进团队整体成果的改善,从而直接影响精益变革文化的可持续性及其对改善患者安全、成本效率和医疗服务的促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信