The potential of narrative-based medicine interventions targeting hospital practitioner burnout: findings from a scoping review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aoife Lily Gallagher, Jessica Brown, Clare Caroll, Enia Perkins, Carrie VanDoren, Aisling McEntegart
{"title":"The potential of narrative-based medicine interventions targeting hospital practitioner burnout: findings from a scoping review.","authors":"Aoife Lily Gallagher, Jessica Brown, Clare Caroll, Enia Perkins, Carrie VanDoren, Aisling McEntegart","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2024.2403607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the empirical literature with regards to narrative-based medicine interventions targeting burnout in hospital-based practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases (<i>n</i> = 6) and manual searches was conducted informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines. Papers were independently screened for quality. Semi-structured interviews were held with practitioners to further explore the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions from the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches yielded 4,439 articles. Following screening by title and abstract, 73 papers remained for full-text review. Six papers were included in the final analysis. Gaps were noted in relation to reporting of intervention details, and of implementation considerations across the dataset. Narrative interventions were considered acceptable by stakeholders but significant issues of compatibility and feasibility were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Narrative-based interventions are complex and warrant a systematic research approach. Addressing factors related to implementation in addition to mechanisms of action is essential to progress this promising interdisciplinary knowledge base.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2024.2403607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To map the empirical literature with regards to narrative-based medicine interventions targeting burnout in hospital-based practitioners.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases (n = 6) and manual searches was conducted informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines. Papers were independently screened for quality. Semi-structured interviews were held with practitioners to further explore the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions from the review.

Results: The searches yielded 4,439 articles. Following screening by title and abstract, 73 papers remained for full-text review. Six papers were included in the final analysis. Gaps were noted in relation to reporting of intervention details, and of implementation considerations across the dataset. Narrative interventions were considered acceptable by stakeholders but significant issues of compatibility and feasibility were identified.

Conclusions: Narrative-based interventions are complex and warrant a systematic research approach. Addressing factors related to implementation in addition to mechanisms of action is essential to progress this promising interdisciplinary knowledge base.

针对医院从业人员职业倦怠的叙事医学干预措施的潜力:范围界定审查的结果。
目的:绘制有关针对医院从业人员职业倦怠的叙事医学干预措施的实证文献:根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定审查指南,对电子数据库(n = 6)和人工检索进行了系统检索。对论文的质量进行了独立筛选。对从业人员进行了半结构化访谈,以进一步探讨综述中干预措施的可接受性和可行性:结果:检索共获得 4439 篇文章。根据标题和摘要进行筛选后,剩下 73 篇论文进行全文审阅。六篇论文被纳入最终分析。我们注意到,在报告干预细节和整个数据集的实施注意事项方面存在差距。利益相关者认为叙事干预是可以接受的,但也发现了兼容性和可行性方面的重大问题:基于叙事的干预措施非常复杂,需要采用系统的研究方法。除了作用机制外,解决与实施相关的因素对于推动这一前景广阔的跨学科知识库的发展也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信