Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241278611
Ivo Cristiano Soares Paiva, Teresa Margarida Almeida Neves, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos Ventura, António Carlos Lopes Vilela, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges Moreira
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.","authors":"Ivo Cristiano Soares Paiva, Teresa Margarida Almeida Neves, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos Ventura, António Carlos Lopes Vilela, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges Moreira","doi":"10.1177/23779608241278611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n </i>= 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n </i>= 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (<i>α</i>=0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241278611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241278611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.

Objectives: To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.

Methods: Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).

Results: The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ2/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ2/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (α=0.96).

Conclusions: This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.

将护理决策工具的文化适应性和心理测量学评估纳入欧洲葡萄牙语。
导言:护士在临床实践中不断面临多种决策要求。护理决策工具(NDMI)可评估护士在这一过程的多个阶段的决策风格:将 NDMI 调整为欧洲葡萄牙语,并在葡萄牙护士群体中评估葡萄牙语版本的心理测量特性:方法:采用描述性研究设计来检验 NDMI 的心理测量特性。对 339 名葡萄牙直接护理护士进行了非概率抽样调查。通过一份包含社会人口学和专业数据的问卷以及 NDMI 葡萄牙语版本(NDMI-PT)收集数据。使用 IBM SPSS (v. 24) 和 AMOS (v. 22) 进行了探索性因子分析(EFA;n = 125)和确证性因子分析(CFA;n = 214):EFA 揭示了由四个潜在因子组成的结构,它们代表了决策过程的重组阶段。CFA发现模型总体拟合良好(χ2/df = 2.13;比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.91;拟合优度指数[GFI] = 0.82;塔克-刘易斯指数[TLI] = 0.90;近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.07;最大似然期望交叉验证指数[MECVI] = 3.13)。对理论结构的心理测量分析表明,四个因子反映了决策阶段,其整体拟合优于经验结构(χ2/df = 1.82;CFI = 0.94;GFI = 0.86;TLI = 0.93;RMSEA = 0.06;MECVI = 2.55)。对 NDMI-PT 构建信度的分析表明,其总体内部一致性非常好(α=0.96):本研究表明,对于所分析的样本而言,经验和理论结构是适当和有效的。NDMI-PT是评估护士决策风格的可靠有效的工具。应继续开展研究,以进一步了解这一有效工具的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信