{"title":"How Should the 3 <i>R</i>'s Be Revised and Why?","authors":"Rebecca Critser, Paul Locke","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2024.724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the \"3 R's\"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"26 9","pages":"E724-729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.
1959 年出版的《人道实验技术原则》确立了今天许多人所熟知的 "3R "原则--提纯、减量和替代。自制定以来,这些原则一直指导着许多人关于在实验室研究中使用非人类动物实验对象的决策。关于如何修改或取代 3 R 原则的讨论一直在进行,主要是受非人类动物权利的哲学伦理学方法和科学进步的推动。本文探讨了对 3 R 的可能更新和解释的优点和缺点。
期刊介绍:
The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.