Cocreative Development of Robotic Interaction Systems for Health Care: Scoping Review.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.2196/58046
Pascal Müller, Patrick Jahn
{"title":"Cocreative Development of Robotic Interaction Systems for Health Care: Scoping Review.","authors":"Pascal Müller, Patrick Jahn","doi":"10.2196/58046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic technologies present challenges to health care professionals and are therefore rarely used. Barriers such as lack of controllability and adaptability and complex control functions affect the human-robot relationship. In addition to educational opportunities, the possibility of individual adaptation can improve the usability and practical implementation of robotics. Previous work has focused on developments from a technology-centered perspective and has included user interests too late in the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study addresses the following research question: What cocreative research approaches are used in the field of nursing robotics to improve the usability, intended use, and goal-directed application of robotic developments for nurses and to support the nursing process?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review provides an overview of the topic and the research activities taking place within it. Five databases and the reference lists of the identified publications were searched for studies without further restrictions. Studies were included if they developed and evaluated interaction and control platforms for robotic systems in health care in a cocreative way with end users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in 419 hits, of which 3 publications were included. All publications were feasibility or user studies that were mainly carried out in the European Union. The 3 interaction and control platforms presented were all prototypes and not commercially available. In addition to those in need of care, all studies also included family carers and health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic interaction and control platforms in health care are rarely, if ever, developed and evaluated with feasibility or user studies that include prototypes and end users. While the involvement of end users is crucial, this review emphasizes that all stakeholders, including health care professionals, should participate in the development process to ensure a holistic understanding of application needs and a focus on user experiences and practical health care needs. It is emphasized that the active involvement of end users in the development process is critical to effectively meeting the needs of the target group.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e58046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic technologies present challenges to health care professionals and are therefore rarely used. Barriers such as lack of controllability and adaptability and complex control functions affect the human-robot relationship. In addition to educational opportunities, the possibility of individual adaptation can improve the usability and practical implementation of robotics. Previous work has focused on developments from a technology-centered perspective and has included user interests too late in the process.

Objective: This study addresses the following research question: What cocreative research approaches are used in the field of nursing robotics to improve the usability, intended use, and goal-directed application of robotic developments for nurses and to support the nursing process?

Methods: This scoping review provides an overview of the topic and the research activities taking place within it. Five databases and the reference lists of the identified publications were searched for studies without further restrictions. Studies were included if they developed and evaluated interaction and control platforms for robotic systems in health care in a cocreative way with end users.

Results: The search resulted in 419 hits, of which 3 publications were included. All publications were feasibility or user studies that were mainly carried out in the European Union. The 3 interaction and control platforms presented were all prototypes and not commercially available. In addition to those in need of care, all studies also included family carers and health care professionals.

Conclusions: Robotic interaction and control platforms in health care are rarely, if ever, developed and evaluated with feasibility or user studies that include prototypes and end users. While the involvement of end users is crucial, this review emphasizes that all stakeholders, including health care professionals, should participate in the development process to ensure a holistic understanding of application needs and a focus on user experiences and practical health care needs. It is emphasized that the active involvement of end users in the development process is critical to effectively meeting the needs of the target group.

医疗保健机器人交互系统的共同创造性开发:范围审查。
背景:机器人技术给医护人员带来了挑战,因此很少被使用。缺乏可控性和适应性以及复杂的控制功能等障碍影响着人与机器人之间的关系。除了教育机会外,个人适应的可能性也能提高机器人技术的可用性和实际应用。以往的工作侧重于从以技术为中心的角度进行开发,将用户利益纳入开发过程的时间太晚:本研究旨在解决以下研究问题:护理机器人领域采用了哪些共同创造的研究方法来提高机器人开发对护士的可用性、预期用途和目标导向应用,并支持护理流程?本范围综述概述了该主题及其研究活动。我们检索了五个数据库和已确定出版物的参考文献目录,以查找无进一步限制的研究。如果研究是以与最终用户共同创造的方式开发和评估医疗保健领域机器人系统的交互和控制平台,则被纳入研究范围:结果:搜索结果有 419 条,其中包括 3 篇出版物。所有出版物都是主要在欧盟进行的可行性或用户研究。所介绍的 3 个互动和控制平台均为原型,未在市场上销售。除了需要护理的人,所有研究还包括家庭护理人员和医疗保健专业人员:结论:医疗保健领域的机器人交互和控制平台很少(如果有的话)通过可行性研究或用户研究进行开发和评估,其中包括原型和最终用户。虽然最终用户的参与至关重要,但本综述强调,包括医疗保健专业人员在内的所有利益相关者都应参与开发过程,以确保全面了解应用需求,并关注用户体验和实际医疗保健需求。需要强调的是,最终用户积极参与开发过程对于有效满足目标群体的需求至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信