Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jingyuan Xie, Jiandong Gao, Mutian Yang, Ting Zhang, Yecheng Liu, Yutong Chen, Zetong Liu, Qimin Mei, Zhimao Li, Huadong Zhu, Ji Wu
{"title":"Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.","authors":"Jingyuan Xie, Jiandong Gao, Mutian Yang, Ting Zhang, Yecheng Liu, Yutong Chen, Zetong Liu, Qimin Mei, Zhimao Li, Huadong Zhu, Ji Wu","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is one of the main causes of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Early prediction is critical for reducing injury. As approximately 36% of sepsis occur within 24 h after emergency department (ED) admission in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV), a prediction system for the ED triage stage would be helpful. Previous methods such as the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are more suitable for screening than for prediction in the ED, and we aimed to find a light-weight, convenient prediction method through machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We accessed the MIMIC-IV for sepsis patient data in the EDs. Our dataset comprised demographic information, vital signs, and synthetic features. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was used to predict the risk of developing sepsis within 24 h after ED admission. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the model's results. Ten percent of the patients were randomly selected as the testing set, while the remaining patients were used for training with 10-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 10-fold cross-validation on 14,957 samples, we reached an accuracy of 84.1%±0.3% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.92±0.02. The model achieved similar performance on the testing set of 1,662 patients. SHAP values showed that the five most important features were acuity, arrival transportation, age, shock index, and respiratory rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models such as XGBoost may be used for sepsis prediction using only a small amount of data conveniently collected in the ED triage stage. This may help reduce workload in the ED and warn medical workers against the risk of sepsis in advance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"15 5","pages":"379-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is one of the main causes of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Early prediction is critical for reducing injury. As approximately 36% of sepsis occur within 24 h after emergency department (ED) admission in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV), a prediction system for the ED triage stage would be helpful. Previous methods such as the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are more suitable for screening than for prediction in the ED, and we aimed to find a light-weight, convenient prediction method through machine learning.

Methods: We accessed the MIMIC-IV for sepsis patient data in the EDs. Our dataset comprised demographic information, vital signs, and synthetic features. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was used to predict the risk of developing sepsis within 24 h after ED admission. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the model's results. Ten percent of the patients were randomly selected as the testing set, while the remaining patients were used for training with 10-fold cross-validation.

Results: For 10-fold cross-validation on 14,957 samples, we reached an accuracy of 84.1%±0.3% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.92±0.02. The model achieved similar performance on the testing set of 1,662 patients. SHAP values showed that the five most important features were acuity, arrival transportation, age, shock index, and respiratory rate.

Conclusion: Machine learning models such as XGBoost may be used for sepsis prediction using only a small amount of data conveniently collected in the ED triage stage. This may help reduce workload in the ED and warn medical workers against the risk of sepsis in advance.

利用机器学习预测急诊科分诊阶段 24 小时内的败血症。
背景:败血症是重症监护病房(ICU)的主要死亡原因之一。早期预测对减少损伤至关重要。在重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC-IV)中,约有 36% 的败血症发生在急诊科(ED)入院后 24 小时内,因此,ED 分诊阶段的预测系统将有所帮助。以往的方法,如快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA),更适合在急诊室进行筛查而非预测,我们的目标是通过机器学习找到一种轻便、便捷的预测方法:我们访问了急诊室脓毒症患者的 MIMIC-IV 数据。我们的数据集包括人口统计学信息、生命体征和合成特征。极端梯度提升法(XGBoost)用于预测急诊室入院后 24 小时内患败血症的风险。此外,还采用了SHAPLEY Additive exPlanations(SHAP)对模型结果进行综合解释。随机抽取 10% 的患者作为测试集,其余患者则用于 10 倍交叉验证训练:在对 14957 个样本进行 10 倍交叉验证后,我们得出的准确率为 84.1%±0.3%,接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积为 0.92±0.02。该模型在由 1,662 名患者组成的测试集中也取得了类似的效果。SHAP值显示,最重要的五个特征是敏锐度、到达交通、年龄、休克指数和呼吸频率:XGBoost 等机器学习模型可用于败血症预测,只需在急诊室分诊阶段方便地收集少量数据。结论:XGBoost 等机器学习模型可用于脓毒症预测,只需在急诊室分诊阶段方便地收集少量数据,这有助于减少急诊室的工作量,并提前向医务工作者发出脓毒症风险警告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信