Comparison of two methods of measuring the urinary protein concentration for the determination of the urinary protein to creatinine ratio in various animal species.

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinarni Medicina Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.17221/30/2024-VETMED
Simona Kovarikova, Jana Blahova, Ivana Vanova, Petr Marsalek
{"title":"Comparison of two methods of measuring the urinary protein concentration for the determination of the urinary protein to creatinine ratio in various animal species.","authors":"Simona Kovarikova, Jana Blahova, Ivana Vanova, Petr Marsalek","doi":"10.17221/30/2024-VETMED","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determination of the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) is an important tool in the quantification of proteinuria in animals. However, the result may be affected by the different methods of determining the urinary protein concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the turbidimetric method using benzethonium chloride and the colorimetric method using pyrogallol red in the measurement of the urinary protein concentration in dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses. A total of 464, 192, 216 and 119 urine samples from dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses were examined in the study, respectively. The group consisted of animals of both sexes and different ages, and, in the dogs and cats, it included both healthy animals and those with various health problems. In the group of horses and guinea pigs, only clinically healthy animals were included. A total of 347, 185, 103 and 100 samples from the dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses were used in the statistical analysis; the other values were excluded as they were below the detection limit. According to the Passing-Bablok analysis, there was a significant constant and proportional difference in the horses. In the dogs, cats and guinea pigs, there was a significant constant difference, but no proportional difference. The Bland-Altman method showed significant bias between the two methods in the horses and cats, but not in the dogs and guinea pigs. In the dogs and cats, the agreement between the two methods was tested and expressed as Cohen's kappa (κ). In the cats, it was almost perfect for the proteinuric samples (κ = 0.823 3) and significant for the non-proteinuric samples (κ = 0.804 9). In the dogs, the agreement was significant for the non-proteinuric samples (κ = 0.621 5) and only moderate for the proteinuric samples (κ = 0.527 5). The influence of the method used to determine the urinary protein concentration should be taken into account when evaluating the UPC. Repeated examinations in one patient should be performed with the same method.</p>","PeriodicalId":23532,"journal":{"name":"Veterinarni Medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinarni Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/30/2024-VETMED","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determination of the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) is an important tool in the quantification of proteinuria in animals. However, the result may be affected by the different methods of determining the urinary protein concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the turbidimetric method using benzethonium chloride and the colorimetric method using pyrogallol red in the measurement of the urinary protein concentration in dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses. A total of 464, 192, 216 and 119 urine samples from dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses were examined in the study, respectively. The group consisted of animals of both sexes and different ages, and, in the dogs and cats, it included both healthy animals and those with various health problems. In the group of horses and guinea pigs, only clinically healthy animals were included. A total of 347, 185, 103 and 100 samples from the dogs, cats, guinea pigs and horses were used in the statistical analysis; the other values were excluded as they were below the detection limit. According to the Passing-Bablok analysis, there was a significant constant and proportional difference in the horses. In the dogs, cats and guinea pigs, there was a significant constant difference, but no proportional difference. The Bland-Altman method showed significant bias between the two methods in the horses and cats, but not in the dogs and guinea pigs. In the dogs and cats, the agreement between the two methods was tested and expressed as Cohen's kappa (κ). In the cats, it was almost perfect for the proteinuric samples (κ = 0.823 3) and significant for the non-proteinuric samples (κ = 0.804 9). In the dogs, the agreement was significant for the non-proteinuric samples (κ = 0.621 5) and only moderate for the proteinuric samples (κ = 0.527 5). The influence of the method used to determine the urinary protein concentration should be taken into account when evaluating the UPC. Repeated examinations in one patient should be performed with the same method.

比较两种测量尿蛋白浓度的方法,以确定不同动物物种的尿蛋白与肌酐比值。
测定尿蛋白与肌酐的比率(UPC)是量化动物蛋白尿的重要工具。然而,不同的尿蛋白浓度测定方法可能会影响测定结果。本研究的目的是比较在测量狗、猫、豚鼠和马的尿蛋白浓度时使用苯甲氯铵的比浊法和使用焦枯红的比色法。这项研究分别检测了狗、猫、豚鼠和马的 464、192、216 和 119 份尿液样本。研究对象包括不同性别和不同年龄的动物,其中狗和猫既包括健康的动物,也包括有各种健康问题的动物。马和豚鼠组只包括临床健康的动物。统计分析分别使用了来自狗、猫、豚鼠和马的 347、185、103 和 100 个样本,其他样本值因低于检测限而被排除在外。根据 Passing-Bablok 分析,马的恒定性和比例差异显著。在狗、猫和豚鼠中,存在显著的常量差异,但没有比例差异。布兰德-阿尔特曼法显示,马和猫的两种方法之间存在明显偏差,而狗和豚鼠则没有。在狗和猫中,对两种方法的一致性进行了测试,并用 Cohen's kappa (κ) 表示。在猫身上,蛋白尿样本的一致性几乎完美(κ = 0.823 3),而非蛋白尿样本的一致性显著(κ = 0.804 9)。在狗身上,非蛋白尿样本的一致性显著(κ = 0.621 5),而蛋白尿样本的一致性仅为中等(κ = 0.527 5)。在评估 UPC 时应考虑到测定尿蛋白浓度的方法的影响。应使用相同的方法对一名患者进行重复检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinarni Medicina
Veterinarni Medicina Veterinary Sciences-兽医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Veterinarni Medicina publishes in English original papers, short communications, critical reviews and case reports from all fields of veterinary and biomedical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信