A Multicenter Prospective Sham-controlled Trial Evaluating a Physiologic Closed-loop Wearable Tibial Neuromodulation System for Overactive Bladder.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018
Colin Goudelocke, Rohit Dhir, Eve Shapiro, Kevin Cline, Denise Elser Poulos, Parke Hedges
{"title":"A Multicenter Prospective Sham-controlled Trial Evaluating a Physiologic Closed-loop Wearable Tibial Neuromodulation System for Overactive Bladder.","authors":"Colin Goudelocke, Rohit Dhir, Eve Shapiro, Kevin Cline, Denise Elser Poulos, Parke Hedges","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based, physiologic closed-loop wearable tibial neuromodulation system in comparison to a sham control for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial included 125 adult subjects with OAB who were randomized 1:1 to receive either active therapy with the Vivally System or sham therapy. Patients were allowed to continue concomitant OAB medications if therapy was stable and the remained on a consistent regimen throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in daily urgency leaks or a ≥30% reduction in daily voids from baseline recorded on an electronic voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting and patient satisfaction with the system was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population (n = 107), the responder rate was significantly higher in the active therapy arm (83.6%) compared to the sham arm (57.7%; P = .032). The system demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no serious AE. Patient satisfaction with the device and mobile application was high with 90/92 (97.8%) reporting they were moderately to extremely satisfied and therapy compliance was above 92% for both therapy and sham groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Vivally System showed significant improvement in OAB symptoms compared to sham therapy, demonstrating a high responder rate and excellent safety profile. The combination of physiologic closed-loop neuromodulation and a behavior-tracking application may offer an effective and user-friendly option for OAB management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a home-based, physiologic closed-loop wearable tibial neuromodulation system in comparison to a sham control for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial included 125 adult subjects with OAB who were randomized 1:1 to receive either active therapy with the Vivally System or sham therapy. Patients were allowed to continue concomitant OAB medications if therapy was stable and the remained on a consistent regimen throughout the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in daily urgency leaks or a ≥30% reduction in daily voids from baseline recorded on an electronic voiding diary. Safety was evaluated through adverse event (AE) reporting and patient satisfaction with the system was recorded.

Results: In the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population (n = 107), the responder rate was significantly higher in the active therapy arm (83.6%) compared to the sham arm (57.7%; P = .032). The system demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no serious AE. Patient satisfaction with the device and mobile application was high with 90/92 (97.8%) reporting they were moderately to extremely satisfied and therapy compliance was above 92% for both therapy and sham groups.

Conclusion: The Vivally System showed significant improvement in OAB symptoms compared to sham therapy, demonstrating a high responder rate and excellent safety profile. The combination of physiologic closed-loop neuromodulation and a behavior-tracking application may offer an effective and user-friendly option for OAB management.

评估治疗膀胱过度活跃的生理闭环可穿戴胫神经调节系统(REDUCEOAB)的多中心前瞻性假对照试验。
目的评估家用生理闭环可穿戴胫骨神经调控系统与假对照治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的有效性和安全性:这项多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、假对照试验包括 125 名患有膀胱过度活动症的成年受试者,他们按 1:1 随机分配接受 Vivally 系统的积极治疗或假治疗。如果治疗效果稳定,并且在整个研究过程中保持一致的治疗方案,则允许患者继续同时服用 OAB 药物。主要疗效终点是应答率,即电子排尿日记记录的每日尿急漏尿量比基线减少≥50%或每日排尿量减少≥30%。通过不良事件(AE)报告评估安全性,并记录患者对系统的满意度:在改良意向治疗(mITT)人群(107 人)中,积极治疗组的应答率(83.6%)明显高于假治疗组(57.7%;P=0.032)。该系统具有良好的安全性,没有出现严重的不良反应。患者对设备和移动应用的满意度很高,90/92(97.8%)的患者表示中度到极度满意,治疗组和假治疗组的治疗依从性均高于92%:与假性治疗相比,Vivally 系统明显改善了 OAB 症状,显示出较高的应答率和出色的安全性。将生理闭环神经调节与行为跟踪应用相结合,可为 OAB 治疗提供一种有效且用户友好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信