Comparison of tissue and urine microbiota in male, intervention naive patients with and without non-invasive bladder cancer.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Muhammed S Ozer, Canet Incir, Huseyin A Yildiz, Muslim D Deger, Alper E Sarikaya, Yesim Tuncok, Gul Ergor, Nuran Esen, Volkan Sen, Ozan Bozkurt, Adil Esen
{"title":"Comparison of tissue and urine microbiota in male, intervention naive patients with and without non-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Muhammed S Ozer, Canet Incir, Huseyin A Yildiz, Muslim D Deger, Alper E Sarikaya, Yesim Tuncok, Gul Ergor, Nuran Esen, Volkan Sen, Ozan Bozkurt, Adil Esen","doi":"10.1159/000541296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUNDː To investigate the presence of dysbiosis in patients with naive bladder cancer. METHODSː Twelve male patients with non-invasive bladder cancer and twelve age-matched healthy males had midstream urine and tissue samples taken. A history of endourological interventions was determined as an exclusion criterion, ensuring that the study was designed solely with naïve participants. The bacterial 16s ribosomal RNA V3-V4 regions were used to examine urine and tissue samples. We compared the microbiota composition of the bladder cancer and control groups. RESULTSː Escherichia Shigella (p&lt;0.001), Staphylococcus (p&lt;0.001), Delftia (p&lt;0.001), Acinetobacter (p&lt;0.001), Corynebacterium (p&lt;0.001), and Enhydrobacter (p&lt;0.001) were abundant in bladder cancer tissue samples. Escherichia Shigella (p&lt;0.001), Ureaplasma (p&lt;0.001), Lactobacillus (p=0.005), Stenotrophomonas (p&lt;0.001), Streptococcus (p&lt;0.001), Corynebacterium (p&lt;0.001), and Prevotella (p=0.039) were abundant in bladder cancer urine samples. Midstream urine has a sensitivity of 83% for detecting dysbiotic bacteria in cancer tissue. CONCLUSIONSː Our research is the first microbiota study of bladder cancer done with naive patients who have never had an endourological intervention. Escherichia Shigella, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Enhydrobacter, Delftia, Corynebacterium, and Pseudomonas were detected as dysbiotic bacteria in bladder cancer. The sensitivity of the midstream urine sample in detecting dysbiosis in tissue is %83.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUNDː To investigate the presence of dysbiosis in patients with naive bladder cancer. METHODSː Twelve male patients with non-invasive bladder cancer and twelve age-matched healthy males had midstream urine and tissue samples taken. A history of endourological interventions was determined as an exclusion criterion, ensuring that the study was designed solely with naïve participants. The bacterial 16s ribosomal RNA V3-V4 regions were used to examine urine and tissue samples. We compared the microbiota composition of the bladder cancer and control groups. RESULTSː Escherichia Shigella (p<0.001), Staphylococcus (p<0.001), Delftia (p<0.001), Acinetobacter (p<0.001), Corynebacterium (p<0.001), and Enhydrobacter (p<0.001) were abundant in bladder cancer tissue samples. Escherichia Shigella (p<0.001), Ureaplasma (p<0.001), Lactobacillus (p=0.005), Stenotrophomonas (p<0.001), Streptococcus (p<0.001), Corynebacterium (p<0.001), and Prevotella (p=0.039) were abundant in bladder cancer urine samples. Midstream urine has a sensitivity of 83% for detecting dysbiotic bacteria in cancer tissue. CONCLUSIONSː Our research is the first microbiota study of bladder cancer done with naive patients who have never had an endourological intervention. Escherichia Shigella, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Enhydrobacter, Delftia, Corynebacterium, and Pseudomonas were detected as dysbiotic bacteria in bladder cancer. The sensitivity of the midstream urine sample in detecting dysbiosis in tissue is %83.

男性非侵袭性膀胱癌患者和未接受干预的患者组织和尿液微生物群的比较。
背景ː 研究天真膀胱癌患者体内是否存在菌群失调。方法ː 12 名男性非侵袭性膀胱癌患者和 12 名年龄匹配的健康男性采集了中段尿液和组织样本。将有过内科治疗史的患者作为排除标准,以确保该研究只针对未接受治疗的患者。我们使用细菌 16s 核糖体 RNA V3-V4 区域来检测尿液和组织样本。我们比较了膀胱癌组和对照组的微生物群组成。结果ː 在膀胱癌组织样本中,志贺氏埃希氏菌(p<0.001)、葡萄球菌(p<0.001)、Delftia(p<0.001)、Acinetobacter(p<0.001)、Corynebacterium(p<0.001)和 Enhydrobacter(p<0.001)大量存在。在膀胱癌尿液样本中,志贺氏大肠杆菌(p<0.001)、尿解脲原体(p<0.001)、乳酸杆菌(p=0.005)、血单胞菌(p<0.001)、链球菌(p<0.001)、棒状杆菌(p<0.001)和普雷沃特氏菌(p=0.039)大量存在。中段尿液检测癌症组织中菌群失调细菌的灵敏度为 83%。结论ː 我们的研究是首次对膀胱癌微生物群进行研究,研究对象是从未接受过尿道内介入治疗的天真患者。在膀胱癌中检测到的菌群失调细菌包括志贺氏菌、葡萄球菌、醋酸杆菌、恩氢杆菌、Delftia、棒状杆菌和假单胞菌。中段尿液样本检测组织中菌群失调的灵敏度为 83%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信