Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-134
Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang
{"title":"Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.","authors":"Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic.

Methods: We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS.

Conclusions: Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.

高龄(≥80 岁)新诊断前列腺癌患者的管理注意事项和治疗效果:一家泌尿外科中心 10 年间的实际数据。
背景:关于高龄男性前列腺癌(PCa)筛查的争论一直存在,导致治疗决定往往基于肿瘤分期和预期寿命。针对高龄前列腺癌患者的临床证据和定制指南仍存在严重不足。本研究旨在比较各种治疗方法在这一人群中的生存结果:我们分析了一家大型泌尿外科中心在 2012 年至 2022 年间收治的疑似 PCa 高龄患者的数据。我们收集了临床和病理特征,并评估了治疗方式,包括姑息治疗和明确治疗。我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析来减少治疗方式之间的偏差。对无进展生存期(PFS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)进行了卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)和多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析:在 4333 名疑似患者中,376 名 80 岁及以上的患者接受了前列腺活检。PCa 的总检出率为 78.7%,其中高级别肿瘤[国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)≥2 级]的发病率较高。大多数患者(86.5%)接受了姑息治疗,13.5%接受了根治治疗。与姑息治疗组相比,确定性治疗组患者的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值较低,肿瘤分期和夏尔森综合指数(CCI)较低,预期寿命较长,老年医学8(G8)评分较高。整个队列的中位OS为72.0个月,其中姑息治疗组为70.0个月,确定性治疗组为96.0个月。多变量分析发现,淋巴和骨转移以及确定性治疗是影响PFS、CSS和OS的独立预后因素:高龄患者虽然是一个小群体,但具有明显的特征,包括较高的 PSA 水平、活检阳性率以及病理分级和分期。对于身体健康的老年患者,尤其是患有局部PCa且预期寿命≥5年的患者,确定性治疗可改善生存预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信