SeqVerify: An accessible analysis tool for cell line genomic integrity, contamination, and gene editing outcomes.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Stem Cell Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-08 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.08.004
Merrick Pierson Smela, Valerio Pepe, Steven Lubbe, Evangelos Kiskinis, George M Church
{"title":"SeqVerify: An accessible analysis tool for cell line genomic integrity, contamination, and gene editing outcomes.","authors":"Merrick Pierson Smela, Valerio Pepe, Steven Lubbe, Evangelos Kiskinis, George M Church","doi":"10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, advances in genome editing and pluripotent stem cell (PSC) culture have let researchers generate edited PSC lines to study a wide variety of biological questions. However, abnormalities in cell lines such as aneuploidy, mutations, on-target and off-target editing errors, and microbial contamination can arise during PSC culture or due to undesired editing outcomes. The ongoing decline of next-generation sequencing prices has made whole-genome sequencing (WGS) a promising option for detecting these abnormalities. However, this approach has been held back by a lack of easily usable data analysis software. Here, we present SeqVerify, a computational pipeline designed to take raw WGS data and a list of intended genome edits, and verify that the edits are present and that there are no abnormalities. We anticipate that SeqVerify will be a useful tool for researchers generating edited PSCs, and more broadly, for cell line quality control in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":21885,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.08.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, advances in genome editing and pluripotent stem cell (PSC) culture have let researchers generate edited PSC lines to study a wide variety of biological questions. However, abnormalities in cell lines such as aneuploidy, mutations, on-target and off-target editing errors, and microbial contamination can arise during PSC culture or due to undesired editing outcomes. The ongoing decline of next-generation sequencing prices has made whole-genome sequencing (WGS) a promising option for detecting these abnormalities. However, this approach has been held back by a lack of easily usable data analysis software. Here, we present SeqVerify, a computational pipeline designed to take raw WGS data and a list of intended genome edits, and verify that the edits are present and that there are no abnormalities. We anticipate that SeqVerify will be a useful tool for researchers generating edited PSCs, and more broadly, for cell line quality control in general.

SeqVerify:细胞系基因组完整性、污染和基因编辑结果的便捷分析工具。
过去十年来,基因组编辑和多能干细胞(PSC)培养技术的进步使研究人员能够生成经过编辑的多能干细胞系,用于研究各种生物学问题。然而,在多能干细胞培养过程中或由于不希望出现的编辑结果,细胞系中可能会出现非整倍体、突变、靶上和非靶上编辑错误以及微生物污染等异常情况。随着下一代测序价格的不断下降,全基因组测序(WGS)已成为检测这些异常的一个很有前景的选择。然而,这种方法却因缺乏易于使用的数据分析软件而受阻。在这里,我们介绍 SeqVerify,它是一种计算管道,旨在获取原始 WGS 数据和预期基因组编辑列表,并验证编辑是否存在,以及是否存在异常。我们预计 SeqVerify 将成为研究人员生成编辑过的 PSCs 的有用工具,更广泛地说,它将成为细胞系质量控制的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem Cell Reports
Stem Cell Reports CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-CELL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
200
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Stem Cell Reports publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research presenting conceptual or practical advances across the breadth of stem cell research and its applications to medicine. Our particular focus on shorter, single-point articles, timely publication, strong editorial decision-making and scientific input by leaders in the field and a "scoop protection" mechanism are reasons to submit your best papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信