Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study.

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1782530
Marcus Vinicius F P Silva, Thais Clementino Lustosa, Ozeas Lima Lins-Filho, Danielle Cristina Silva Clímaco, Tarcya Couto Patriota, Jessica Amorim Magalhães, Fernando Queiroga, Marilia Montenegro Cabral, Ana Kelley Medeiros, Luiz Oliveira Neto, Valesca Kehrle Rodrigues, Luciano F Drager, Rodrigo Pinto Pedrosa
{"title":"Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study.","authors":"Marcus Vinicius F P Silva, Thais Clementino Lustosa, Ozeas Lima Lins-Filho, Danielle Cristina Silva Clímaco, Tarcya Couto Patriota, Jessica Amorim Magalhães, Fernando Queiroga, Marilia Montenegro Cabral, Ana Kelley Medeiros, Luiz Oliveira Neto, Valesca Kehrle Rodrigues, Luciano F Drager, Rodrigo Pinto Pedrosa","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Portable respiratory monitoring (PM) has been used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population. However, its validation in patients with both OSA and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), remains unclear. <b>Objective</b>  The aim of the study was to validate PM for the diagnosis of OSA in patients with COPD. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  In this crossectional study, COPD patients were submitted simultaneously to polysomnography (PSG) and PM. Moreover, the risk for OSA was verified by the Berlin, NoSAS, and STOP-BANG questionnaires. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PM were calculated for the cutoff points of the hypopnea apnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, and 30 events/hour, as well as for the questionnaires. The Bland-Altman test and correlation analyses between the AHI of the PSG and PM were performed. <b>Results</b>  A total of 103 patients were evaluated (age 67.5 ± 9.9 years, 60% men). The STOP-BANG questionnaire had the highest sensitivity for OSA diagnosis, at 94.4% (72.7-99.9%). The sensitivity of PM decreased (87.0, 66.7, and 44.4%), and the specificity increased 40.0, 78.6, and 100.0%) as the AHI cutoff point increased from 5, 15, and 30. The Bland-Altman test indicated good limits of agreement (AHI = 5.5 ± 11.7 events/hour). Therefore, the AHI results of the PM showed a strong and positive correlation with those of the PSG (r = 0.70, <i>p</i>  < 0.0001). <b>Conclusion</b>  The PM test can be a useful tool for OSA diagnosis in patients with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"17 3","pages":"e221-e226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Portable respiratory monitoring (PM) has been used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population. However, its validation in patients with both OSA and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), remains unclear. Objective  The aim of the study was to validate PM for the diagnosis of OSA in patients with COPD. Materials and Methods  In this crossectional study, COPD patients were submitted simultaneously to polysomnography (PSG) and PM. Moreover, the risk for OSA was verified by the Berlin, NoSAS, and STOP-BANG questionnaires. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PM were calculated for the cutoff points of the hypopnea apnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, and 30 events/hour, as well as for the questionnaires. The Bland-Altman test and correlation analyses between the AHI of the PSG and PM were performed. Results  A total of 103 patients were evaluated (age 67.5 ± 9.9 years, 60% men). The STOP-BANG questionnaire had the highest sensitivity for OSA diagnosis, at 94.4% (72.7-99.9%). The sensitivity of PM decreased (87.0, 66.7, and 44.4%), and the specificity increased 40.0, 78.6, and 100.0%) as the AHI cutoff point increased from 5, 15, and 30. The Bland-Altman test indicated good limits of agreement (AHI = 5.5 ± 11.7 events/hour). Therefore, the AHI results of the PM showed a strong and positive correlation with those of the PSG (r = 0.70, p  < 0.0001). Conclusion  The PM test can be a useful tool for OSA diagnosis in patients with COPD.

用于诊断慢性阻塞性肺病患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的便携式呼吸监测系统的验证:一项交叉研究
导言:便携式呼吸监测(PM)已被用于诊断普通人群的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。然而,在同时患有 OSA 和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的患者中,其有效性仍不明确。本研究旨在验证 PM 对 COPD 患者 OSA 诊断的有效性。材料和方法 在这项交叉研究中,慢性阻塞性肺病患者同时接受了多导睡眠图(PSG)和 PM 的检查。此外,还通过柏林、NoSAS 和 STOP-BANG 问卷核实了 OSA 的风险。计算了低通气呼吸暂停指数(AHI)为 5、15 和 30 次/小时的临界点以及问卷调查对 PM 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。对 PSG 和 PM 的 AHI 进行了 Bland-Altman 检验和相关性分析。结果 共评估了 103 名患者(年龄为 67.5 ± 9.9 岁,60% 为男性)。STOP-BANG 问卷对 OSA 诊断的灵敏度最高,为 94.4%(72.7%-99.9%)。随着 AHI 临界点从 5、15 到 30 的增加,PM 的灵敏度下降(87.0%、66.7% 和 44.4%),特异性增加(40.0%、78.6% 和 100.0%)。布兰-阿尔特曼检验表明两者的一致性很好(AHI = 5.5 ± 11.7 次/小时)。因此,PM 的 AHI 结果与 PSG 的 AHI 结果显示出很强的正相关性(r = 0.70,p 结论 PM 测试可作为慢性阻塞性肺病患者诊断 OSA 的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信