A Retrospective Investigation of Abortion Storm in Abergele Goats, Waghimira Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.

IF 2.3 Q2 BIOLOGY
Scientifica Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5686443
Adane Bahiru, Ayalew Assefa, Biruk Alemu Gemeda, Hiwot Desta, Abebe Tibebu, Abebe Sahle, Barbara Wieland
{"title":"A Retrospective Investigation of Abortion Storm in Abergele Goats, Waghimira Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.","authors":"Adane Bahiru, Ayalew Assefa, Biruk Alemu Gemeda, Hiwot Desta, Abebe Tibebu, Abebe Sahle, Barbara Wieland","doi":"10.1155/2024/5686443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective study was conducted in Abergele and Ziquala districts in Ethiopia to investigate the occurrence, impact, and potential risk factors for abortion in small ruminants linked to a regional abortion storm. Affected (case) and nonaffected (control) villages were compared to assess infectious and noninfectious risk factors causing abortions. A case village was defined as a village with abortion seen in all households enrolled in the study, while a control village is characterized by presence of abortion in two and fewer households. A questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, and serological examinations were used to assess the differences in the abortion rate between the case and control villages. The Rose Bengal Plate Test for Brucellosis, <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> Antibody Test Kit for <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>, and ELISA for <i>Chlamydophila abortus</i> and <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> were used to detect antibodies. Per village 15 household flocks were selected. In the case villages, all flocks were affected by abortion (a mean abortion of 13 animals in Abergele and 9 in Ziquala). In contrast, only three households reported abortions in the control villages. A total of 176 blood samples were collected from the case and control villages for further laboratory diagnosis of possible causes of abortion. Of the examined flocks, 17%, 10.2%, and 2.8% were positive for <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>, and <i>Chlamydophila abortus,</i> respectively. However, antibodies against <i>Brucella melitensis</i> were not detected. While the seroprevalence was greater for some infectious agents of abortion, there was no significant difference between the case and control villages. It is clear that the abortion problem in the study villages is complex and likely due to a mix of poor husbandry practices and the presence of infectious diseases. To better understand the underlying causes of abortion, there is a need to conduct a longitudinal study involving testing for more pathogens at the household level combined with reliable data on husbandry practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":21726,"journal":{"name":"Scientifica","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5686443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5686443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted in Abergele and Ziquala districts in Ethiopia to investigate the occurrence, impact, and potential risk factors for abortion in small ruminants linked to a regional abortion storm. Affected (case) and nonaffected (control) villages were compared to assess infectious and noninfectious risk factors causing abortions. A case village was defined as a village with abortion seen in all households enrolled in the study, while a control village is characterized by presence of abortion in two and fewer households. A questionnaire survey, focus group discussions, and serological examinations were used to assess the differences in the abortion rate between the case and control villages. The Rose Bengal Plate Test for Brucellosis, Toxoplasma gondii Antibody Test Kit for Toxoplasma gondii, and ELISA for Chlamydophila abortus and Coxiella burnetii were used to detect antibodies. Per village 15 household flocks were selected. In the case villages, all flocks were affected by abortion (a mean abortion of 13 animals in Abergele and 9 in Ziquala). In contrast, only three households reported abortions in the control villages. A total of 176 blood samples were collected from the case and control villages for further laboratory diagnosis of possible causes of abortion. Of the examined flocks, 17%, 10.2%, and 2.8% were positive for Coxiella burnetii, Toxoplasma gondii, and Chlamydophila abortus, respectively. However, antibodies against Brucella melitensis were not detected. While the seroprevalence was greater for some infectious agents of abortion, there was no significant difference between the case and control villages. It is clear that the abortion problem in the study villages is complex and likely due to a mix of poor husbandry practices and the presence of infectious diseases. To better understand the underlying causes of abortion, there is a need to conduct a longitudinal study involving testing for more pathogens at the household level combined with reliable data on husbandry practices.

埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区 Waghimira 区 Abergele 山羊流产风暴的回顾性调查。
在埃塞俄比亚的 Abergele 和 Ziquala 地区开展了一项回顾性研究,以调查与地区性流产风暴相关的小反刍动物流产的发生、影响和潜在风险因素。对受影响村庄(病例村)和未受影响村庄(对照村)进行了比较,以评估导致流产的感染性和非感染性风险因素。病例村的定义是所有参加研究的家庭都出现流产的村庄,而对照村的特征是只有两户或更少的家庭出现流产。通过问卷调查、焦点小组讨论和血清学检查来评估病例村和对照村流产率的差异。采用玫瑰红平板试验检测布鲁氏菌病、弓形虫抗体检测试剂盒检测弓形虫、ELISA 检测流产衣原体和烧伤柯西氏菌抗体。每个村选择 15 户家禽。在病例村,所有羊群都受到流产的影响(Abergele 村平均流产 13 头,Ziquala 村平均流产 9 头)。相比之下,对照村只有三户报告有流产现象。从病例村和对照村共采集了 176 份血样,用于进一步化验诊断可能的流产原因。在接受检查的鸡群中,分别有 17%、10.2% 和 2.8% 的鸡对烧伤柯西氏杆菌、弓形虫和流产衣原体呈阳性反应。但是,没有检测到布鲁氏菌抗体。虽然某些流产传染源的血清流行率较高,但病例村和对照村之间并无明显差异。很明显,研究村庄的流产问题很复杂,很可能是由不良饲养方式和传染病共同造成的。为了更好地了解流产的根本原因,有必要进行纵向研究,包括在家庭层面检测更多病原体,并结合有关饲养方式的可靠数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientifica
Scientifica BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientifica is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in the life sciences, environmental sciences, health sciences, and medicine. The journal is divided into the 65 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信