Correlation of gastrointestinal symptom rating scale and frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease with endoscopic findings.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Takashi Ando, Etsuko Kishimoto, Tomoko Nishimura, Eiko Imamoto, Tomohisa Takagi, Takeshi Ishikawa, Yuji Naito, Yoshito Itoh
{"title":"Correlation of gastrointestinal symptom rating scale and frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease with endoscopic findings.","authors":"Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Takashi Ando, Etsuko Kishimoto, Tomoko Nishimura, Eiko Imamoto, Tomohisa Takagi, Takeshi Ishikawa, Yuji Naito, Yoshito Itoh","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2406537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus and has a 13% global prevalence that is increasing. GERD symptoms negatively impact physical, social, and emotional quality of life. The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) determine the efficacy of treatment but may not correlate with endoscopically estimated esophageal mucosal injury severity. We aimed to probe the correlation between FSSG, GSRS, and esophageal injury severity to evaluate whether these scores can predict GERD severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2962 patients who underwent physical examinations, including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, at the Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Japan, were enrolled in this study. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was used to diagnose fundic mucosal atrophy, reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification, gastroesophageal flap value function (GEFV) based on Hill's classification, and Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic diagnoses were examined for correlations with FSSG and GSRS scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In reflux esophagitis, FSSG and GSRS scores correlated with LA-B and LA-C endoscopic diagnosis but not with LA-M and LA-A endoscopic findings. Multiple regression analysis results were similar. FSSG scores reflected advanced fundic gland mucosal atrophy, while GSRS scores associated with high grade of GEFV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report to examine the correlation between FSSG and GSRS scores and endoscopic findings in a relatively large patient population. Our findings suggest that these scores can diagnose the severity of reflux esophagitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2406537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus and has a 13% global prevalence that is increasing. GERD symptoms negatively impact physical, social, and emotional quality of life. The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) determine the efficacy of treatment but may not correlate with endoscopically estimated esophageal mucosal injury severity. We aimed to probe the correlation between FSSG, GSRS, and esophageal injury severity to evaluate whether these scores can predict GERD severity.

Methods: A total of 2962 patients who underwent physical examinations, including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, at the Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Japan, were enrolled in this study. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was used to diagnose fundic mucosal atrophy, reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification, gastroesophageal flap value function (GEFV) based on Hill's classification, and Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic diagnoses were examined for correlations with FSSG and GSRS scores.

Results: In reflux esophagitis, FSSG and GSRS scores correlated with LA-B and LA-C endoscopic diagnosis but not with LA-M and LA-A endoscopic findings. Multiple regression analysis results were similar. FSSG scores reflected advanced fundic gland mucosal atrophy, while GSRS scores associated with high grade of GEFV.

Conclusions: This is the first report to examine the correlation between FSSG and GSRS scores and endoscopic findings in a relatively large patient population. Our findings suggest that these scores can diagnose the severity of reflux esophagitis.

胃食管反流病症状的胃肠道症状评分量表和频率量表与内窥镜检查结果的相关性。
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD胃食管反流病(GERD)是由胃内容物反流至食管引起的,全球发病率为 13%,且呈上升趋势。胃食管反流病的症状会对身体、社交和情感方面的生活质量产生负面影响。胃食管反流病症状频率量表(FSSG)和胃肠道症状评分量表(GSRS)可确定治疗效果,但可能与内镜下估计的食管粘膜损伤严重程度不相关。我们旨在探究 FSSG、GSRS 和食管损伤严重程度之间的相关性,以评估这些评分是否能预测胃食管反流病的严重程度:本研究共纳入了 2962 名在日本京都仓口医疗中心接受体检(包括上消化道内窥镜检查)的患者。上消化道内窥镜用于诊断胃底粘膜萎缩、基于洛杉矶(LA)分类的反流性食管炎、基于希尔(Hill)分类的胃食管瓣值功能(GEFV)和巴雷特食管。对内镜诊断与 FSSG 和 GSRS 评分的相关性进行了研究:结果:在反流性食管炎中,FSSG 和 GSRS 评分与 LA-B 和 LA-C 内镜诊断相关,但与 LA-M 和 LA-A 内镜检查结果无关。多元回归分析结果相似。FSSG评分反映了晚期胃底腺体粘膜萎缩,而GSRS评分与高级别GEFV相关:这是第一份在相对较大的患者群体中研究 FSSG 和 GSRS 评分与内镜检查结果之间相关性的报告。我们的研究结果表明,这些评分可以诊断反流性食管炎的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信