Anaerobic digestates in agricultural soils: A systematic review of their effects on antibiotic resistance genes.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marco Allegrini, María Celina Zabaloy
{"title":"Anaerobic digestates in agricultural soils: A systematic review of their effects on antibiotic resistance genes.","authors":"Marco Allegrini, María Celina Zabaloy","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tackling the dissemination of antibiotic resistance is one of the main global challenges. Manures from animal production are a recognized source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) requiring appropriate treatment methods. One of the main approaches for manure treatment is anaerobic digestion (AD). Meta-analyses have demonstrated that AD can significantly reduce the load of ARGs. However, antibiotics, ARGs and MGEs still remain in the final product (digestate). A sustainable agricultural use of digestates under the One Health framework requires wide assessments of their effects in the soil resistome. The objective of this review was to present the state of the art of digestate effects on ARGs of agricultural soils, focusing exclusively on digestates from animal manures. A systematic review was conducted. The examination of the resulting literature indicated that although temporal decays are observed for a variety of ARGs in single-application and repeated-applications experiments, for certain ARGs the pre-treatment or control levels are not restored. However, the low number of studies and the heterogeneous experimental conditions preclude a clear understanding of the fate of ARGs in soil and their risk for agroecosystems. The inclusion of multiple MGEs and the assessment of the long-term influence of digestates on soil properties and microbial communities could be keystones for a better understanding of the risks associated with digestate-induced changes in the soil resistome.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2024.07.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tackling the dissemination of antibiotic resistance is one of the main global challenges. Manures from animal production are a recognized source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) requiring appropriate treatment methods. One of the main approaches for manure treatment is anaerobic digestion (AD). Meta-analyses have demonstrated that AD can significantly reduce the load of ARGs. However, antibiotics, ARGs and MGEs still remain in the final product (digestate). A sustainable agricultural use of digestates under the One Health framework requires wide assessments of their effects in the soil resistome. The objective of this review was to present the state of the art of digestate effects on ARGs of agricultural soils, focusing exclusively on digestates from animal manures. A systematic review was conducted. The examination of the resulting literature indicated that although temporal decays are observed for a variety of ARGs in single-application and repeated-applications experiments, for certain ARGs the pre-treatment or control levels are not restored. However, the low number of studies and the heterogeneous experimental conditions preclude a clear understanding of the fate of ARGs in soil and their risk for agroecosystems. The inclusion of multiple MGEs and the assessment of the long-term influence of digestates on soil properties and microbial communities could be keystones for a better understanding of the risks associated with digestate-induced changes in the soil resistome.

农业土壤中的厌氧消化物:系统回顾其对抗生素抗性基因的影响。
应对抗生素耐药性的传播是全球面临的主要挑战之一。动物生产产生的粪便是公认的抗生素耐药性基因(ARGs)和移动遗传因子(MGEs)的来源,需要采用适当的处理方法。厌氧消化(AD)是粪便处理的主要方法之一。元分析表明,厌氧消化可显著减少 ARGs 的负荷。然而,抗生素、ARGs 和 MGEs 仍会残留在最终产品(沼渣)中。要在 "同一健康 "框架下实现沼渣的可持续农业利用,就必须对其在土壤抗性组中的影响进行广泛评估。本综述的目的是介绍沼渣对农业土壤ARGs影响的最新进展,重点关注来自动物粪便的沼渣。我们进行了系统性的回顾。研究结果表明,虽然在单次施用和重复施用实验中观察到了各种 ARGs 的时间衰减,但某些 ARGs 无法恢复到处理前或对照组的水平。然而,由于研究数量少,实验条件不尽相同,因此无法清楚地了解 ARGs 在土壤中的归宿及其对农业生态系统的风险。纳入多个多边环境协定以及评估沼渣对土壤特性和微生物群落的长期影响,是更好地了解沼渣引起的土壤抗性组变化的相关风险的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信