Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R).

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001324

Yang Yang, Emanuele Preti, Jia Hu, Shuangyi Chen, Yuan Wang, Shanshan Su, Wenhui Jiang, Wenqing Zhao, Jing Tao, John F Clarkin, Jianyin Qiu

{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R).","authors":"Yang Yang, Emanuele Preti, Jia Hu, Shuangyi Chen, Yuan Wang, Shanshan Su, Wenhui Jiang, Wenqing Zhao, Jing Tao, John F Clarkin, Jianyin Qiu","doi":"10.1037/pas0001324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a set of dimensional criteria was added as an emerging alternative model to the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Parallel to this, within the object relations conceptualization of personality pathology, a structured interview, the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), was developed to assess pathological personality and then revised (STIPO-R). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the STIPO-R were tested on a sample of 236 Chinese participants, including both psychiatric patients and healthy individuals. Overall, the STIPO-R showed good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and generally satisfactory results in structure and convergent validity. The STIPO-R also demonstrated discriminant validity (healthy individuals vs. psychiatric patients with PD vs. psychiatric patients without PD). Results are also discussed in light of cultural differences between Chinese and Western cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"36 9","pages":"e27-e37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a set of dimensional criteria was added as an emerging alternative model to the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Parallel to this, within the object relations conceptualization of personality pathology, a structured interview, the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), was developed to assess pathological personality and then revised (STIPO-R). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the STIPO-R were tested on a sample of 236 Chinese participants, including both psychiatric patients and healthy individuals. Overall, the STIPO-R showed good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and generally satisfactory results in structure and convergent validity. The STIPO-R also demonstrated discriminant validity (healthy individuals vs. psychiatric patients with PD vs. psychiatric patients without PD). Results are also discussed in light of cultural differences between Chinese and Western cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文本刊更多论文

人格组织结构访谈-修订版（STIPO-R）中文版的信度和效度。

随着《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的出版，增加了一套维度标准，作为人格障碍（PD）诊断的新兴替代模式；美国精神病学协会，2013 年）。与此同时，在人格病理学的客体关系概念化中，开发了一种结构化访谈--人格组织结构化访谈（STIPO），用于评估病态人格，并对其进行了修订（STIPO-R）。本研究在 236 名中国受试者（包括精神病患者和健康人）中测试了 STIPO-R 中文版的信度和效度。总体而言，STIPO-R 显示出良好的内部一致性、施测者间信度和测验重复信度，在结构效度和收敛效度方面也取得了令人满意的结果。STIPO-R 还表现出了区分效度（健康人 vs. 患有帕金森病的精神病人 vs. 未患帕金森病的精神病人）。此外，还结合中西方文化差异对结果进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

167

期刊介绍： Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews