The prognostic value of HALP score and sPESI in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mahmut Yaman, Murat Orak, Hasan Mansur Durgun, Veysi Tekin, Şilan Göger Ülgüt, Sema Belek, Berçem Tugay Günel, Mehmet Üstündağ, Cahfer Güloğlu, Ercan Gündüz
{"title":"The prognostic value of HALP score and sPESI in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.","authors":"Mahmut Yaman, Murat Orak, Hasan Mansur Durgun, Veysi Tekin, Şilan Göger Ülgüt, Sema Belek, Berçem Tugay Günel, Mehmet Üstündağ, Cahfer Güloğlu, Ercan Gündüz","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), often arising from deep vein thrombosis, remains a high-mortality condition despite diagnostic advancements. Prognostic models like Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and sPESI identify low-risk groups effectively. The Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet (HALP) score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, shows prognostic value in cancers and cardiovascular diseases. This study examines the relationship between in-hospital mortality HALP score and simplified PESI (sPESI) in PTE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with PTE in the emergency department of a tertiary medical faculty from 2018 to 2023. PTE diagnosis was confirmed via computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Data on transthoracic echocardiography, D-dimer levels, demographics, laboratory results, PESI, sPESI, and HALP scores, and in-hospital mortality were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, clinical characteristics of 171 patients with PTE were analysed. The average age was 61.88 ± 19.94 years, and 53.2% were female. Mortality was observed in 19.3% of patients. PESI and sPESI scores were significant predictors of mortality, with area under the curve values of 0.938 and 0.879, respectively. PESI score > 175.50 indicated a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 18.208; P < .001), while sPESI >2.50 was also a strong predictor (HR = 11.840; P < .001). No significant cut-off value for HALP in predicting mortality was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study supports the reliability of sPESI and PESI scores in predicting in-hospital mortality in PTE patients. However, the prognostic value of the HALP score requires further investigation. Our findings highlight the need for developing risk stratification models. Key message What is already known on this topic?  The PESI and sPESI scores are established prognostic models that effectively identify low-risk groups in patients with PTE. The HALP score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, has shown prognostic value in cancer and cardiovascular diseases. What this study adds?  This study demonstrates that while PESI and sPESI scores are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality in PTE patients, the HALP score does not have a significant cut-off value for predicting mortality. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  The findings support the continued use of PESI and sPESI scores for risk stratification in clinical practice, potentially influencing guidelines and policies on managing PTE. Further research into the HALP score's role in other contexts may refine its prognostic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"60-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), often arising from deep vein thrombosis, remains a high-mortality condition despite diagnostic advancements. Prognostic models like Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and sPESI identify low-risk groups effectively. The Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet (HALP) score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, shows prognostic value in cancers and cardiovascular diseases. This study examines the relationship between in-hospital mortality HALP score and simplified PESI (sPESI) in PTE patients.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with PTE in the emergency department of a tertiary medical faculty from 2018 to 2023. PTE diagnosis was confirmed via computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Data on transthoracic echocardiography, D-dimer levels, demographics, laboratory results, PESI, sPESI, and HALP scores, and in-hospital mortality were collected.

Results: In this study, clinical characteristics of 171 patients with PTE were analysed. The average age was 61.88 ± 19.94 years, and 53.2% were female. Mortality was observed in 19.3% of patients. PESI and sPESI scores were significant predictors of mortality, with area under the curve values of 0.938 and 0.879, respectively. PESI score > 175.50 indicated a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 18.208; P < .001), while sPESI >2.50 was also a strong predictor (HR = 11.840; P < .001). No significant cut-off value for HALP in predicting mortality was identified.

Conclusions: Our study supports the reliability of sPESI and PESI scores in predicting in-hospital mortality in PTE patients. However, the prognostic value of the HALP score requires further investigation. Our findings highlight the need for developing risk stratification models. Key message What is already known on this topic?  The PESI and sPESI scores are established prognostic models that effectively identify low-risk groups in patients with PTE. The HALP score, reflecting nutritional status and systemic inflammation, has shown prognostic value in cancer and cardiovascular diseases. What this study adds?  This study demonstrates that while PESI and sPESI scores are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality in PTE patients, the HALP score does not have a significant cut-off value for predicting mortality. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  The findings support the continued use of PESI and sPESI scores for risk stratification in clinical practice, potentially influencing guidelines and policies on managing PTE. Further research into the HALP score's role in other contexts may refine its prognostic utility.

HALP 评分和 sPESI 在预测肺血栓栓塞症患者院内死亡率方面的预后价值。
背景:肺血栓栓塞症(PTE)通常源于深静脉血栓形成,尽管诊断技术不断进步,但仍是一种死亡率很高的疾病。肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)和 sPESI 等预后模型能有效识别低风险人群。反映营养状况和全身炎症的血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分显示了癌症和心血管疾病的预后价值。本研究探讨了 PTE 患者院内死亡率 HALP 评分与简化 PESI(sPESI)之间的关系:这项回顾性观察研究纳入了 2018 年至 2023 年期间在一所三级医学院急诊科确诊为 PTE 的患者。PTE诊断通过计算机断层扫描肺血管造影术确诊。收集了经胸超声心动图、D-二聚体水平、人口统计学、实验室结果、PESI、sPESI和HALP评分以及院内死亡率等数据:本研究分析了 171 名 PTE 患者的临床特征。平均年龄为(61.88±19.94)岁,53.2%为女性。19.3%的患者出现死亡。PESI 和 sPESI 评分是预测死亡率的重要指标,曲线下面积值分别为 0.938 和 0.879。PESI 评分 > 175.50 表明死亡率风险明显较高(HR = 18.208;P 2.50 也是一个强有力的预测因子(HR = 11.840;P 结论:我们的研究证实了 sPESI 和 PESI 评分在预测 PTE 患者院内死亡率方面的可靠性。然而,HALP 评分的预后价值还需要进一步研究。我们的研究结果突显了开发风险分层模型的必要性。关键信息 有关此主题的已知信息有哪些? PESI 和 sPESI 评分是已确立的预后模型,可有效识别 PTE 患者中的低风险群体。反映营养状况和全身炎症的 HALP 评分已在癌症和心血管疾病中显示出预后价值。本研究有何新意? 本研究表明,PESI 和 sPESI 评分可显著预测 PTE 患者的院内死亡率,而 HALP 评分在预测死亡率方面没有显著的临界值。本研究对研究、实践或政策有何影响? 研究结果支持在临床实践中继续使用 PESI 和 sPESI 评分进行风险分层,从而对管理 PTE 的指南和政策产生潜在影响。对 HALP 评分在其他情况下的作用的进一步研究可能会完善其预后效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信