Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among people with a family history of colorectal cancer: A scoping review

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tun Firzara Abdul Malik , Hooi Chin Beh , Christine Shamala Selvaraj , Christian David Mallen , Chirk Jenn Ng , Yew Kong Lee
{"title":"Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among people with a family history of colorectal cancer: A scoping review","authors":"Tun Firzara Abdul Malik ,&nbsp;Hooi Chin Beh ,&nbsp;Christine Shamala Selvaraj ,&nbsp;Christian David Mallen ,&nbsp;Chirk Jenn Ng ,&nbsp;Yew Kong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising, with people having a family history of CRC (PFH-CRC) facing double the risk compared to the average-risk population. Despite this, CRC screening uptake among PFH-CRC remains low. There is a lack of systematic mapping of interventions promoting CRC screening in this high-risk population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review to identify the types of interventions targeting PFH-CRC, their effectiveness in increasing CRC screening uptake, and the elements associated with the outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping review was followed. The search for eligible articles was conducted from the inception of each database until 17 July 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Web of Science with no restrictions on language.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty studies from 1995 to 2023 across 13 countries were included; mostly from high-income countries. There was considerable variability in study design, intervention characteristics, and screening outcomes. Eleven studies used theoretical frameworks in intervention development. Fourteen studies reported statistically significant increases in screening uptake among PFH-CRC, most using complex, multiple-component interventions. Tailored print materials and patient navigation more consistently demonstrated increased screening uptake, while counselling yielded mixed results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Interventions for promoting CRC screening uptake in PFH-CRC commonly incorporate print material, patient navigation and counselling, often combined into complex interventions. Future research should include more implementation studies to translate these interventions into real-world settings. Additionally, there are gaps in research from low- and middle-income countries, highlighting the need for further research in these resource-limited settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 108137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The global incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising, with people having a family history of CRC (PFH-CRC) facing double the risk compared to the average-risk population. Despite this, CRC screening uptake among PFH-CRC remains low. There is a lack of systematic mapping of interventions promoting CRC screening in this high-risk population.

Objective

We conducted a scoping review to identify the types of interventions targeting PFH-CRC, their effectiveness in increasing CRC screening uptake, and the elements associated with the outcomes.

Methods

The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping review was followed. The search for eligible articles was conducted from the inception of each database until 17 July 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Web of Science with no restrictions on language.

Results

Thirty studies from 1995 to 2023 across 13 countries were included; mostly from high-income countries. There was considerable variability in study design, intervention characteristics, and screening outcomes. Eleven studies used theoretical frameworks in intervention development. Fourteen studies reported statistically significant increases in screening uptake among PFH-CRC, most using complex, multiple-component interventions. Tailored print materials and patient navigation more consistently demonstrated increased screening uptake, while counselling yielded mixed results.

Conclusion

Interventions for promoting CRC screening uptake in PFH-CRC commonly incorporate print material, patient navigation and counselling, often combined into complex interventions. Future research should include more implementation studies to translate these interventions into real-world settings. Additionally, there are gaps in research from low- and middle-income countries, highlighting the need for further research in these resource-limited settings.
在有大肠癌家族史的人群中推广大肠癌筛查的干预措施:范围综述。
背景:全球结直肠癌(CRC)发病率呈上升趋势,有 CRC 家族史的人(PFH-CRC)面临的风险是平均风险人群的两倍。尽管如此,有家族史的人接受 CRC 筛查的比例仍然很低。在这一高风险人群中,缺乏促进 CRC 筛查的干预措施的系统性规划:我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定针对 PFH-CRC 的干预措施类型、其在提高 CRC 筛查接受率方面的有效性以及与结果相关的要素:方法: 采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的方法进行范围界定研究。在PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane、PsycINFO和Web of Science等数据库中搜索符合条件的文章,搜索时间从每个数据库的开始时间起至2024年7月17日,语言不限:共纳入了 13 个国家从 1995 年到 2023 年的 30 项研究,其中大部分来自高收入国家。研究设计、干预特点和筛查结果存在很大差异。有 11 项研究在制定干预措施时使用了理论框架。有 14 项研究报告称,PFH-CRC 的筛查率在统计学上有了显著提高,其中大多数研究采用了复杂的多成分干预措施。量身定制的印刷材料和患者导航更一致地表明筛查接受率有所提高,而咨询的结果则好坏参半:结论:促进PFH-CRC接受CRC筛查的干预措施通常包括印刷材料、患者指导和咨询,通常结合成复杂的干预措施。未来的研究应包括更多的实施研究,以便将这些干预措施应用到实际环境中。此外,中低收入国家的研究还存在空白,这凸显了在这些资源有限的环境中开展进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信