Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest managed with and without a specialized code team: A retrospective observational study.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309376
Yasmeen Abu Fraiha, Tali Shafat, Shlomi Codish, Amit Frenkel, Dror Dolfin, Jacob Dreiher, Yuval Konstantino, Said Abu Abed, Doron Schwartz, Alexander Fichman, Luba Kvich, Ori Galante
{"title":"Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest managed with and without a specialized code team: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Yasmeen Abu Fraiha, Tali Shafat, Shlomi Codish, Amit Frenkel, Dror Dolfin, Jacob Dreiher, Yuval Konstantino, Said Abu Abed, Doron Schwartz, Alexander Fichman, Luba Kvich, Ori Galante","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) still has a poor prognosis despite medical advancements in recent decades. Early and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as well as good teamwork, are important prognostic factors. There are no clear guidelines regarding the composition of a dedicated hospital CPR team. We compared outcomes of IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to ward medical staff with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective observational study based on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation database of Soroka University Medical Center from January 2016 until December 2019. We compared the results of resuscitations conducted by regular ward medical staff, certified in ACLS, versus those conducted by the dedicated hospital's CPR team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 360 CPR events analyzed, 141 (39.1%) ended in return of spontaneous circulation, 70 (19.4%) patients were alive after 24 hours, 23 (6.4%) survived for 30 days, and 18 (5%) survived to discharge. Of those who survived to discharge, 11 (61.1%) had a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1-2, and 7 (38.9%) had a score of 3-4 (mean 2.09). Survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group compared to the ward-team group (7.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.013). However, with propensity score analysis the difference in survival became insignificant (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.40-9.63, p = 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no difference in survival between IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to a standard ward team, both trained with biennial ACLS training. Nevertheless, crude survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) still has a poor prognosis despite medical advancements in recent decades. Early and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as well as good teamwork, are important prognostic factors. There are no clear guidelines regarding the composition of a dedicated hospital CPR team. We compared outcomes of IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to ward medical staff with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study based on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation database of Soroka University Medical Center from January 2016 until December 2019. We compared the results of resuscitations conducted by regular ward medical staff, certified in ACLS, versus those conducted by the dedicated hospital's CPR team.

Results: Of the 360 CPR events analyzed, 141 (39.1%) ended in return of spontaneous circulation, 70 (19.4%) patients were alive after 24 hours, 23 (6.4%) survived for 30 days, and 18 (5%) survived to discharge. Of those who survived to discharge, 11 (61.1%) had a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1-2, and 7 (38.9%) had a score of 3-4 (mean 2.09). Survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group compared to the ward-team group (7.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.013). However, with propensity score analysis the difference in survival became insignificant (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.40-9.63, p = 0.40).

Conclusion: We found no difference in survival between IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to a standard ward team, both trained with biennial ACLS training. Nevertheless, crude survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group.

院内心脏骤停在有专业代码小组和没有专业代码小组的情况下的处理结果:回顾性观察研究。
背景:尽管近几十年来医疗技术不断进步,但院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的预后仍然很差。早期和高质量的心肺复苏(CPR)以及良好的团队合作是重要的预后因素。关于医院专门心肺复苏团队的组成,目前还没有明确的指导方针。我们比较了医院专门心肺复苏团队与接受过高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)培训的病房医务人员对 IHCA 的治疗效果:这是一项基于索罗卡大学医疗中心心肺复苏数据库的单中心回顾性观察研究,研究时间为 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月。我们比较了由获得 ACLS 认证的普通病房医务人员与医院专门的心肺复苏团队进行的复苏结果:在分析的 360 例心肺复苏事件中,141 例(39.1%)以恢复自主循环结束,70 例(19.4%)患者在 24 小时后存活,23 例(6.4%)存活 30 天,18 例(5%)存活至出院。在出院后存活的患者中,11 人(61.1%)的脑功能分类 (CPC) 得分为 1-2,7 人(38.9%)为 3-4(平均 2.09)。与病房小组相比,心肺复苏小组组的出院生存率明显更高(7.6% 对 1.9%,P = 0.013)。然而,通过倾向评分分析,生存率的差异变得不明显(RR = 1.97,95% CI:0.40-9.63,p = 0.40):我们发现,由专门的医院心肺复苏团队与标准病房团队治疗 IHCA 患者的存活率没有差异,两者都接受过两年一次的 ACLS 培训。尽管如此,心肺复苏小组组的粗略出院存活率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信