Modification of childcare's outdoor setting for toddler physical activity and nature-based play: A mixed methods study.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309113
Chelsea L Kracht, Amanda E Staiano, Melissa Harris, Kristin Domangue, Michelle Grantham-Caston
{"title":"Modification of childcare's outdoor setting for toddler physical activity and nature-based play: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Chelsea L Kracht, Amanda E Staiano, Melissa Harris, Kristin Domangue, Michelle Grantham-Caston","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toddler physical activity is critical for child health, but little is known about its applications in early childhood education (ECE) centers. The aims of this study were 1) to determine if pragmatic and nature-based modifications to an ECE center's outdoor setting were feasible and acceptable, and 2) to identify barriers and facilitators of toddler physical activity at ECE centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiphase mixed-methods study (QUANT+QUAL) was conducted. In the QUANT study, a stepped, sequential modification of the outdoor setting, using pragmatic and cost-effective nature-based elements, was conducted with a delayed control group over 10-weeks, with follow-up assessments 3-months later (week-20). Five elements (tree cookies, garden, teacher training, playground stencils, and nature table) were introduced individually. Feasibility was assessed using teacher surveys. Acceptability and engagement were assessed by direct observation of toddler use of outdoor elements. Accelerometers were used to assess toddlers' physical activity during outdoor sessions. The QUAL study included semi-structured interviews from ECE center directors (n = 27, 55.6% African American, 92.5% female) that were analyzed using content analysis for themes related to 1) toddler physical activity, 2) barriers and facilitators to toddler outdoor environment changes, 3) perspectives on nature-based elements, and 4) provider training. Member check focus groups (n = 2, 7-10/group) were conducted for additional interpretation. All three sources were reviewed for integration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toddlers engaged in physical activity for most of the outdoor sessions (>85%). This limited the effect of the intervention, but aligned with directors' and members' sentiments that toddlers were already quite active. Across directors, reported barriers to toddler outdoor environment changes were teacher turnover and finances. All nature-based elements, except the stencils, were feasible and acceptable, even at week-20. Directors and members identified additional age-appropriate elements, and desired pragmatic training with technical assistance and funding to implement these changes. Directors and members also desired a curriculum that could be used outdoors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nature-based elements were feasible and acceptable to toddlers. Directors were enthusiastic about nature-based elements, but barriers exist in linking directors with these elements. Opportunities to combine toddler-age curricula and pragmatic options for outdoor play may improve ECE centers' outdoor settings and ultimately toddler health.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Toddler physical activity is critical for child health, but little is known about its applications in early childhood education (ECE) centers. The aims of this study were 1) to determine if pragmatic and nature-based modifications to an ECE center's outdoor setting were feasible and acceptable, and 2) to identify barriers and facilitators of toddler physical activity at ECE centers.

Methods: A multiphase mixed-methods study (QUANT+QUAL) was conducted. In the QUANT study, a stepped, sequential modification of the outdoor setting, using pragmatic and cost-effective nature-based elements, was conducted with a delayed control group over 10-weeks, with follow-up assessments 3-months later (week-20). Five elements (tree cookies, garden, teacher training, playground stencils, and nature table) were introduced individually. Feasibility was assessed using teacher surveys. Acceptability and engagement were assessed by direct observation of toddler use of outdoor elements. Accelerometers were used to assess toddlers' physical activity during outdoor sessions. The QUAL study included semi-structured interviews from ECE center directors (n = 27, 55.6% African American, 92.5% female) that were analyzed using content analysis for themes related to 1) toddler physical activity, 2) barriers and facilitators to toddler outdoor environment changes, 3) perspectives on nature-based elements, and 4) provider training. Member check focus groups (n = 2, 7-10/group) were conducted for additional interpretation. All three sources were reviewed for integration.

Results: Toddlers engaged in physical activity for most of the outdoor sessions (>85%). This limited the effect of the intervention, but aligned with directors' and members' sentiments that toddlers were already quite active. Across directors, reported barriers to toddler outdoor environment changes were teacher turnover and finances. All nature-based elements, except the stencils, were feasible and acceptable, even at week-20. Directors and members identified additional age-appropriate elements, and desired pragmatic training with technical assistance and funding to implement these changes. Directors and members also desired a curriculum that could be used outdoors.

Conclusions: Nature-based elements were feasible and acceptable to toddlers. Directors were enthusiastic about nature-based elements, but barriers exist in linking directors with these elements. Opportunities to combine toddler-age curricula and pragmatic options for outdoor play may improve ECE centers' outdoor settings and ultimately toddler health.

改造托儿所的户外环境,促进幼儿体育活动和以自然为基础的游戏:混合方法研究。
背景:幼儿体育活动对儿童健康至关重要,但人们对其在幼儿教育(ECE)中心的应用却知之甚少。本研究的目的是:1)确定对幼教中心的户外环境进行基于自然的实用性改造是否可行且可接受;2)确定幼教中心幼儿体育活动的障碍和促进因素:进行了一项多阶段混合方法研究(QUANT+QUAL)。在 "QUANT "研究中,利用实用且具有成本效益的自然元素,对户外环境进行了阶梯式、循序渐进的改造,并与延迟对照组一起进行了为期 10 周的研究,在 3 个月后(第 20 周)进行了跟踪评估。分别引入了五个元素(树饼干、花园、教师培训、操场模板和自然桌)。可行性通过教师调查进行评估。通过直接观察幼儿使用户外元素的情况来评估幼儿的接受度和参与度。使用加速度计评估幼儿在户外活动中的体力活动。QUAL 研究包括对幼教中心主任(n = 27,55.6% 为非洲裔美国人,92.5% 为女性)的半结构式访谈,访谈采用内容分析法对以下相关主题进行了分析:1)幼儿体能活动;2)幼儿户外环境变化的障碍和促进因素;3)对自然元素的看法;4)提供者培训。此外,还开展了成员检查焦点小组(n = 2,7-10 人/组),以进行更多解释。对所有三个资料来源进行了整合审查:结果:幼儿在大部分户外活动中都参加了体育活动(>85%)。这限制了干预措施的效果,但与园长和成员的观点一致,即幼儿已经相当活跃。所有园长都表示,幼儿户外活动环境改变的障碍是教师流动和资金问题。除模板外,所有基于自然的元素都是可行和可接受的,即使是在第 20 周。园长和成员们确定了更多适合幼儿年龄的元素,并希望得到技术援助和资金方面的务实培训,以实施这些改变。主任和成员还希望课程可以在户外使用:以自然为基础的元素是可行的,也是幼儿可以接受的。园长们对基于自然的元素充满热情,但在将园长与这些元素联系起来方面存在障碍。将幼儿年龄段的课程与户外游戏的实用选择结合起来,可能会改善幼教中心的户外环境,并最终改善幼儿的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信