Additional predictors of stroke and transient ischaemic attack in BEFAST positive patients in out-of-hours emergency primary care.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310769
Florien S van Royen, Geert-Jan Geersing, Daphne C Erkelens, Mathé Delissen, Jorn V F Rutten, Dorien L Zwart, Maarten van Smeden, Frans H Rutten, Sander van Doorn
{"title":"Additional predictors of stroke and transient ischaemic attack in BEFAST positive patients in out-of-hours emergency primary care.","authors":"Florien S van Royen, Geert-Jan Geersing, Daphne C Erkelens, Mathé Delissen, Jorn V F Rutten, Dorien L Zwart, Maarten van Smeden, Frans H Rutten, Sander van Doorn","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0310769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients suspected of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), rapid triaging is imperative to improve clinical outcomes. For this purpose, balance-eye-face-arm-speech-time (BEFAST) items are used in out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC). We explored the risk of stroke and TIA among BEFAST positive patients calling to the OHS-PC, and assessed whether additional predictors could improve risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study of retrospectively gathered routine care data from telephone triage tape-recordings of patients calling the OHS-PC with neurological deficit symptoms, classified as BEFAST positive. Four models-with the predictors age, sex, a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk factors-were fitted using logistic regression to predict the outcome stroke or TIA. Likelihood ratio testing was used to select the best model, which was subsequently internally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of stroke or TIA diagnosis was 52% among 1,289 BEFAST positive patients, median age 72 years, 56% female sex. Of patients with the outcome stroke/TIA, 24% received a low urgency allocation, while 92% had signs or symptoms when calling. Only the addition of age and sex improved predicting stroke or TIA (internally validated c-statistic 0.72, 95%CI 0.69-0.75). The predicted risk of stroke or TIA remained below 20% in those aged below 40. Females aged 70 or over and males aged 55 or over, had a predicted risk above 50%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Urgency allocation appears to be suboptimal in BEFAST positive patients calling the OHS-PC. Risk stratification could be improved in this setting by adding age and sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In patients suspected of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), rapid triaging is imperative to improve clinical outcomes. For this purpose, balance-eye-face-arm-speech-time (BEFAST) items are used in out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC). We explored the risk of stroke and TIA among BEFAST positive patients calling to the OHS-PC, and assessed whether additional predictors could improve risk stratification.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of retrospectively gathered routine care data from telephone triage tape-recordings of patients calling the OHS-PC with neurological deficit symptoms, classified as BEFAST positive. Four models-with the predictors age, sex, a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk factors-were fitted using logistic regression to predict the outcome stroke or TIA. Likelihood ratio testing was used to select the best model, which was subsequently internally validated.

Results: The risk of stroke or TIA diagnosis was 52% among 1,289 BEFAST positive patients, median age 72 years, 56% female sex. Of patients with the outcome stroke/TIA, 24% received a low urgency allocation, while 92% had signs or symptoms when calling. Only the addition of age and sex improved predicting stroke or TIA (internally validated c-statistic 0.72, 95%CI 0.69-0.75). The predicted risk of stroke or TIA remained below 20% in those aged below 40. Females aged 70 or over and males aged 55 or over, had a predicted risk above 50%.

Discussion: Urgency allocation appears to be suboptimal in BEFAST positive patients calling the OHS-PC. Risk stratification could be improved in this setting by adding age and sex.

非工作时间急诊初级保健中 BEFAST 阳性患者中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的其他预测因素。
导言:对于疑似中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者,快速分流是改善临床疗效的当务之急。为此,在非工作时间初级保健(OHS-PC)中使用了平衡-视力-面部-手臂-语言时间(BEFAST)项目。我们探讨了致电 OHS-PC 的 BEFAST 阳性患者发生中风和 TIA 的风险,并评估了额外的预测因素是否能改善风险分层:这是一项横断面研究,研究人员从电话分诊录音中回顾性收集了被归类为 BEFAST 阳性的致电 OHS-PC 且伴有神经功能缺失症状的患者的常规护理数据。研究人员使用逻辑回归法拟合了四个模型(预测因子包括年龄、性别、心脑血管疾病史和心血管风险因素),以预测中风或 TIA 的结果。使用似然比检验选出最佳模型,随后进行内部验证:在 1289 名 BEFAST 阳性患者中,脑卒中或 TIA 诊断风险为 52%,中位年龄为 72 岁,女性占 56%。在结果为中风/TIA 的患者中,24% 接受了低急诊分配,而 92% 在呼叫时有体征或症状。只有加入年龄和性别后,中风或 TIA 的预测结果才会有所改善(内部验证的 c 统计量为 0.72,95%CI 为 0.69-0.75)。40 岁以下人群的中风或 TIA 预测风险仍低于 20%。70 岁及以上女性和 55 岁及以上男性的预测风险高于 50%:讨论:在呼叫 OHS-PC 的 BEFAST 阳性患者中,急诊分配似乎并不理想。在这种情况下,可以通过增加年龄和性别来改进风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信