The Surfactant Properties of Clindamycin as a Useful Adjunct for Removing Ruptured Silicone Implants.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006176
Tahera Alnaseri, Leila Musavi, Timothy Deming, Jason Roostaeian, Andrew Da Lio, Thomas G Mason, Michael R DeLong
{"title":"The Surfactant Properties of Clindamycin as a Useful Adjunct for Removing Ruptured Silicone Implants.","authors":"Tahera Alnaseri, Leila Musavi, Timothy Deming, Jason Roostaeian, Andrew Da Lio, Thomas G Mason, Michael R DeLong","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silicone gel removal after breast implant rupture is a difficult task. Silicone is hydrophobic and thus cannot be irrigated effectively with saline. Attempts at mechanical removal with sponges are often partially successful. Incomplete removal results in persistent silicone contamination with possible local inflammation, infection, and silicone granulomata. In this partially quantitative investigation, we assess the de-adhesion ability of different clindamycin formulations against known surfactant controls when combined with silicone gel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To demonstrate surfactant properties in vitro, clindamycin phosphate, clindamycin hydrochloride, and a known surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), were compared. An amount of 170 g of silicone gel placed in a dry glass container exhibited strong adherence to the container walls. In separate trials, clindamycin phosphate (300 mg in 100 mL), clindamycin HCl (300 mg in 100 mL), and SDS (1 g in 100 mL) solutions with normal saline were added to the silicone aggregate, and de-adhesion properties were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All solutions aided in the de-adhesion of the sticky silicone from glass substrate. The SDS had the strongest effect, followed by clindamycin phosphate and then clindamycin HCl. The observed interactions suggested that all of the solutions behaved as ionic surfactant coating the silicone with negative charges via adsorption. However, the phosphate anionic formulation was associated with a greater surfactant effect than HCl.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clindamycin acts as a surfactant to aid in the clinical removal of ruptured silicone gel. Clindamycin phosphate seems to have a stronger effect than clindamycin HCl, likely related to the negative charges on the phosphate groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Silicone gel removal after breast implant rupture is a difficult task. Silicone is hydrophobic and thus cannot be irrigated effectively with saline. Attempts at mechanical removal with sponges are often partially successful. Incomplete removal results in persistent silicone contamination with possible local inflammation, infection, and silicone granulomata. In this partially quantitative investigation, we assess the de-adhesion ability of different clindamycin formulations against known surfactant controls when combined with silicone gel.

Methods: To demonstrate surfactant properties in vitro, clindamycin phosphate, clindamycin hydrochloride, and a known surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), were compared. An amount of 170 g of silicone gel placed in a dry glass container exhibited strong adherence to the container walls. In separate trials, clindamycin phosphate (300 mg in 100 mL), clindamycin HCl (300 mg in 100 mL), and SDS (1 g in 100 mL) solutions with normal saline were added to the silicone aggregate, and de-adhesion properties were compared.

Results: All solutions aided in the de-adhesion of the sticky silicone from glass substrate. The SDS had the strongest effect, followed by clindamycin phosphate and then clindamycin HCl. The observed interactions suggested that all of the solutions behaved as ionic surfactant coating the silicone with negative charges via adsorption. However, the phosphate anionic formulation was associated with a greater surfactant effect than HCl.

Conclusions: Clindamycin acts as a surfactant to aid in the clinical removal of ruptured silicone gel. Clindamycin phosphate seems to have a stronger effect than clindamycin HCl, likely related to the negative charges on the phosphate groups.

克林霉素的表面活性剂特性可作为移除破裂硅胶假体的有效辅助手段。
背景:乳房植入物破裂后硅凝胶的清除是一项艰巨的任务。硅胶具有疏水性,因此无法用生理盐水进行有效冲洗。使用海绵进行机械清除的尝试通常只能取得部分成功。移除不彻底会导致硅胶污染持续存在,并可能引起局部炎症、感染和硅胶肉芽肿。在这项部分定量研究中,我们评估了不同克林霉素配方与已知表面活性剂对照组结合使用硅凝胶时的去粘性能力:为了在体外证明表面活性剂的特性,我们比较了克林霉素磷酸酯、盐酸克林霉素和已知的表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)。将 170 克硅凝胶放入干燥的玻璃容器中,结果表明硅凝胶与容器壁有很强的粘附性。在不同的试验中,将克林霉素磷酸酯(300 毫克,100 毫升)、克林霉素盐酸盐(300 毫克,100 毫升)和 SDS(1 克,100 毫升)溶液与生理盐水一起加入硅胶聚合体中,并比较其脱附特性:结果:所有溶液都能帮助粘性硅胶从玻璃基底上脱胶。SDS 的效果最强,其次是克林霉素磷酸酯,然后是克林霉素盐酸盐。观察到的相互作用表明,所有溶液都是离子型表面活性剂,通过吸附作用使硅胶带上负电荷。然而,与盐酸相比,磷酸阴离子配方具有更强的表面活性剂效果:结论:克林霉素可作为表面活性剂帮助临床去除破裂的硅凝胶。克林霉素磷酸酯似乎比克林霉素盐酸盐具有更强的效果,这可能与磷酸基团上的负电荷有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信