{"title":"Combination of Cultured Epidermal Autograft and Meshed Skin Graft Enables Full-thickness Excision of Giant Congenital Nevus.","authors":"Chie Kobori, Makoto Hikosaka, Wataru Tsugu, Koki Sakurai, Yukari Nakajima, Hikaru Kono, Akira Kikuchi, Yuki Nakajima, Miho Sumi, Kosuke Kuwahara, Tsuyoshi Kaneko","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a skin condition characterized by an abnormally dark, noncancerous skin patch. Two main issues with GCMN are aesthetics and malignant transformation. Various methods of treatment are reported, but each method has its own disadvantages, such as risk of recurrence or restriction in the treatable area. We report three cases of GCMN treated with full-thickness excision and immediately covered with cultured epidermal autograft (CEA) combined with split-thickness skin graft (STSG). This is a single-center, single-arm, retrospective report of three cases. The nevus was excised at full skin thickness. Meshed STSG taken from scalp was grafted to the defect, and CEA was grafted over simultaneously. Two weeks later, CEA was applied again as a booster. The same procedures were performed until all nevi were excised. In all cases, nearly complete epithelialization was achieved at several weeks after operation. The reconstructed skin was elastic, and there was no persistent joint contracture. Vancouver Scar Scale score was 4-8. Mesh-like appearance was observed. A hypertrophic scar appeared in the area without meshed STSG. An intractable keloid was observed in one patient. No recurrence of the nevus was observed during the follow-up period. The donor site scar on the scalp was well hidden by the hair. Our method enables full-thickness resection and reconstruction of a wider area in a single operation while improving the take rate of CEA, with reasonable degree of scarring compared with conventional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a skin condition characterized by an abnormally dark, noncancerous skin patch. Two main issues with GCMN are aesthetics and malignant transformation. Various methods of treatment are reported, but each method has its own disadvantages, such as risk of recurrence or restriction in the treatable area. We report three cases of GCMN treated with full-thickness excision and immediately covered with cultured epidermal autograft (CEA) combined with split-thickness skin graft (STSG). This is a single-center, single-arm, retrospective report of three cases. The nevus was excised at full skin thickness. Meshed STSG taken from scalp was grafted to the defect, and CEA was grafted over simultaneously. Two weeks later, CEA was applied again as a booster. The same procedures were performed until all nevi were excised. In all cases, nearly complete epithelialization was achieved at several weeks after operation. The reconstructed skin was elastic, and there was no persistent joint contracture. Vancouver Scar Scale score was 4-8. Mesh-like appearance was observed. A hypertrophic scar appeared in the area without meshed STSG. An intractable keloid was observed in one patient. No recurrence of the nevus was observed during the follow-up period. The donor site scar on the scalp was well hidden by the hair. Our method enables full-thickness resection and reconstruction of a wider area in a single operation while improving the take rate of CEA, with reasonable degree of scarring compared with conventional methods.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.