Development and internal validation of a clinical risk tool to predict chronic postsurgical pain in adults: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nicholas Papadomanolakis-Pakis, Simon Haroutounian, Johan Kløvgaard Sørensen, Charlotte Runge, Lone Dragnes Brix, Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Lone Nikolajsen
{"title":"Development and internal validation of a clinical risk tool to predict chronic postsurgical pain in adults: a prospective multicentre cohort study.","authors":"Nicholas Papadomanolakis-Pakis, Simon Haroutounian, Johan Kløvgaard Sørensen, Charlotte Runge, Lone Dragnes Brix, Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Lone Nikolajsen","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a highly prevalent condition. To improve CPSP management, we aimed to develop and internally validate generalizable point-of-care risk tools for preoperative and postoperative prediction of CPSP 3 months after surgery. A multicentre, prospective, cohort study in adult patients undergoing elective surgery was conducted between May 2021 and May 2023. Prediction models were developed for the primary outcome according to the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria and a secondary threshold-based CPSP outcome. Models were developed with multivariable logistic regression and backward stepwise selection. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling, and optimism was corrected by shrinkage of predictor weights. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis. The final cohort included 960 patients, 16.3% experienced CPSP according to the primary outcome and 33.6% according to the secondary outcome. The primary CPSP model included age and presence of other preoperative pain. Predictors in the threshold-based models associated with an increased risk of CPSP included younger age, female sex, preoperative pain in the surgical area, other preoperative pain, orthopedic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, expected surgery duration, and acute postsurgical pain intensity. Optimism-corrected area-under-the-receiver-operating curves for preoperative and postoperative threshold-based models were 0.748 and 0.747, respectively. These models demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. The primary CPSP model demonstrated fair predictive performance including 2 significant predictors. Derivation of a generalizable risk tool with point-of-care predictors was possible for the threshold-based CPSP models but requires independent validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a highly prevalent condition. To improve CPSP management, we aimed to develop and internally validate generalizable point-of-care risk tools for preoperative and postoperative prediction of CPSP 3 months after surgery. A multicentre, prospective, cohort study in adult patients undergoing elective surgery was conducted between May 2021 and May 2023. Prediction models were developed for the primary outcome according to the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria and a secondary threshold-based CPSP outcome. Models were developed with multivariable logistic regression and backward stepwise selection. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling, and optimism was corrected by shrinkage of predictor weights. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis. The final cohort included 960 patients, 16.3% experienced CPSP according to the primary outcome and 33.6% according to the secondary outcome. The primary CPSP model included age and presence of other preoperative pain. Predictors in the threshold-based models associated with an increased risk of CPSP included younger age, female sex, preoperative pain in the surgical area, other preoperative pain, orthopedic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, expected surgery duration, and acute postsurgical pain intensity. Optimism-corrected area-under-the-receiver-operating curves for preoperative and postoperative threshold-based models were 0.748 and 0.747, respectively. These models demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. The primary CPSP model demonstrated fair predictive performance including 2 significant predictors. Derivation of a generalizable risk tool with point-of-care predictors was possible for the threshold-based CPSP models but requires independent validation.

用于预测成人慢性手术后疼痛的临床风险工具的开发和内部验证:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
摘要:慢性手术后疼痛(CPSP)是一种高发疾病。为改善 CPSP 管理,我们旨在开发并在内部验证可用于术前和术后预测术后 3 个月 CPSP 的通用护理点风险工具。我们在 2021 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月期间对接受择期手术的成年患者进行了一项多中心、前瞻性、队列研究。根据国际疼痛研究协会的标准为主要结果和基于阈值的次要 CPSP 结果建立了预测模型。模型采用多变量逻辑回归和逆向逐步选择法建立。采用引导重采样法进行内部验证,并通过缩小预测因子权重来校正乐观程度。通过判别和校准评估模型性能。临床实用性通过决策曲线分析进行评估。最终队列包括960名患者,根据主要结果,16.3%的患者经历了CPSP,根据次要结果,33.6%的患者经历了CPSP。主要的 CPSP 模型包括年龄和术前是否存在其他疼痛。在基于阈值的模型中,与 CPSP 风险增加相关的预测因素包括年龄较小、性别为女性、术前手术区域疼痛、术前其他疼痛、骨科手术、微创手术、预期手术持续时间和急性术后疼痛强度。基于阈值的术前和术后模型的乐观校正受体下面积操作曲线分别为 0.748 和 0.747。这些模型具有良好的校准性和临床实用性。主要的 CPSP 模型的预测性能尚可,其中包括两个重要的预测因子。基于阈值的 CPSP 模型可以利用护理点预测因子推导出通用的风险工具,但需要独立验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信