A Comparative Analysis of Low Dose Grafalon® Versus Thymoglobuline® as Serotherapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Pediatric and Young Adult Population.
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Low Dose Grafalon<sup>®</sup> Versus Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup> as Serotherapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Pediatric and Young Adult Population.","authors":"Garima Nirmal, Gaurav Kharya, Ravi Shankar, Saksham Singh, Subhasish Paul, Mohit Choudhary, Vaibhav Chadha, Kamol Iskandarov, Sayitov Begali, Atish Bakane, Goutomi Chatterjee","doi":"10.1080/08880018.2024.2398523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) forms an essential component of conditioning in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Due to the shift of donor preference to alternate donors, reliance on rabbit-ATG (rATG) has increased. Two different forms of rATG (Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup> and Grafalon<sup>®</sup>) are available for clinical use but data to support the use of one over the other is sparse. We retrospectively analyzed data of 144 patients who underwent allogenic-HSCT for benign hematological conditions at our center, from August 2019 to August 2023. Of these, 87 received Grafalon<sup>®</sup> and 57 received Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup>. The majority (77.7%) underwent HSCT for hemoglobinopathies and all received pre-transplant immunosuppression. Engraftment kinetics was similar in 2 cohorts. Six patients had primary graft failure (PGF). There was no difference in the incidence of PGF stratified by serotherapy. Overall survival(OS) for the cohort was 74.9%. Kaplan-Meier estimate of OSand EFSwas significantly better in Grafalon<sup>®</sup> group than Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup> (84.4 ± 0.04% vs 64.1% ±0.065%) (<i>p</i>-value= 0.04%) and (84.4 ± 0.04% and 61.2%±0.065% (<i>p</i>-value = 0.01)). Extensive chronic GVHD was (14%) higher in Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup> group and (2.3%) in Grafalon<sup>®</sup>. Immune reconstitution at day + 100 was not statistically different between the two groups. On univariate analysis, Thymoglobuline<sup>®</sup> serotherapy (OR (95% CI) =4.665 (1.2-18.04))was associated with increased risk of acute grade III-IV GvHD. In our study, Grafalon<sup>®</sup> tended to have better OS, decreased incidence of acute grade III-IV GvHD, and extensive cGVHD. There was no difference in engraftment kinetics, PGF, and immune reconstitution between 2 cohorts of serotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19746,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08880018.2024.2398523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) forms an essential component of conditioning in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Due to the shift of donor preference to alternate donors, reliance on rabbit-ATG (rATG) has increased. Two different forms of rATG (Thymoglobuline® and Grafalon®) are available for clinical use but data to support the use of one over the other is sparse. We retrospectively analyzed data of 144 patients who underwent allogenic-HSCT for benign hematological conditions at our center, from August 2019 to August 2023. Of these, 87 received Grafalon® and 57 received Thymoglobuline®. The majority (77.7%) underwent HSCT for hemoglobinopathies and all received pre-transplant immunosuppression. Engraftment kinetics was similar in 2 cohorts. Six patients had primary graft failure (PGF). There was no difference in the incidence of PGF stratified by serotherapy. Overall survival(OS) for the cohort was 74.9%. Kaplan-Meier estimate of OSand EFSwas significantly better in Grafalon® group than Thymoglobuline® (84.4 ± 0.04% vs 64.1% ±0.065%) (p-value= 0.04%) and (84.4 ± 0.04% and 61.2%±0.065% (p-value = 0.01)). Extensive chronic GVHD was (14%) higher in Thymoglobuline® group and (2.3%) in Grafalon®. Immune reconstitution at day + 100 was not statistically different between the two groups. On univariate analysis, Thymoglobuline® serotherapy (OR (95% CI) =4.665 (1.2-18.04))was associated with increased risk of acute grade III-IV GvHD. In our study, Grafalon® tended to have better OS, decreased incidence of acute grade III-IV GvHD, and extensive cGVHD. There was no difference in engraftment kinetics, PGF, and immune reconstitution between 2 cohorts of serotherapy.
小剂量格拉法隆®与胸腺球蛋白®在儿童和青少年造血干细胞移植中作为血清疗法的比较分析》(A Comparative Analysis of Low Dose Grafalon® Versus Thymoglobuline® as Serotherapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Pediatric and Young Adult Population)。
抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)是造血干细胞移植(HSCT)调理的重要组成部分。由于捐献者偏好转向替代捐献者,对兔抗胸腺球蛋白(rATG)的依赖性增加。目前有两种不同形式的rATG(胸腺球蛋白®和格拉法隆®)可供临床使用,但支持使用其中一种的数据并不多。我们回顾性分析了本中心自2019年8月至2023年8月期间因良性血液病接受异基因造血干细胞移植的144名患者的数据。其中,87 人接受了格拉法隆®,57 人接受了胸腺球蛋白®。大多数患者(77.7%)因血红蛋白病接受造血干细胞移植,所有患者都接受了移植前免疫抑制。两组患者的移植动力学相似。6名患者出现原发性移植失败(PGF)。按血清疗法分层,PGF的发生率没有差异。组群的总生存率(OS)为74.9%。格拉法隆®组的OS和EFS的Kaplan-Meier估计值明显优于胸腺球蛋白®组(84.4 ± 0.04% vs 64.1% ± 0.065%)(P值= 0.04%)和(84.4 ± 0.04% vs 61.2% ± 0.065%)(P值= 0.01)。胸腺球蛋白®组和格拉法隆®组的广泛慢性GVHD分别为(14%)和(2.3%)。两组在第 + 100 天的免疫重建无统计学差异。单变量分析显示,胸腺球蛋白血清疗法(OR (95% CI) =4.665 (1.2-18.04))与急性 III-IV 级 GvHD 风险增加有关。在我们的研究中,格拉法隆®往往具有更好的OS,降低了急性III-IV级GvHD和广泛cGVHD的发生率。两种血清疗法在移植动力学、PGF和免疫重建方面没有差异。
期刊介绍:
PHO: Pediatric Hematology and Oncology covers all aspects of research and patient management within the area of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood. Our goal is to make PHO: Pediatric Hematology and Oncology the premier journal for the international community of clinicians and scientists who together aim to define optimal therapeutic strategies for children and young adults with cancer and blood disorders. The journal supports articles that address research in diverse clinical settings, exceptional case studies/series that add novel insights into pathogenesis and/or clinical care, and reviews highlighting discoveries and challenges emerging from consortia and conferences. Clinical studies as well as basic and translational research reports regarding cancer pathogenesis, genetics, molecular diagnostics, pharmacology, stem cells, molecular targeting, cellular and immune therapies and transplantation are of interest. Papers with a focus on supportive care, late effects and on related ethical, legal, psychological, social, cultural, or historical aspects of these fields are also appreciated. Reviews on important developments in the field are welcome. Articles from scientists and clinicians across the international community of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology are considered for publication. The journal is not dependent on or connected with any organization or society. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review prior to publication. Our Editorial Board includes experts in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology representing a wide range of academic and geographic diversity.