Indications, Surgical Strategies And Hearing Outcomes of Revision Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on 2602 Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1002/ohn.974
Michele Tomasoni, Daniele Borsetto, Pietro Canzi, Alperen Vural, Gabriele Testa, Cesare Piazza, Lorenzo Pinelli, Luca Oscar Redaelli de Zinis
{"title":"Indications, Surgical Strategies And Hearing Outcomes of Revision Stapes Surgery for Otosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on 2602 Patients.","authors":"Michele Tomasoni, Daniele Borsetto, Pietro Canzi, Alperen Vural, Gabriele Testa, Cesare Piazza, Lorenzo Pinelli, Luca Oscar Redaelli de Zinis","doi":"10.1002/ohn.974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We considered original series describing RSS for otosclerosis, reporting postoperative hearing outcomes according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines for conductive hearing loss (CHL) for at least 30 consecutive cases. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled proportion and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis were conducted using random effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included, for a total of 2602 patients (2735 ears) and 2359 postoperative hearing results. RSS was mostly performed for recurrent CHL with air-bone gap (ABG)>20 dB. Multiple concomitant causes were often present, with prosthesis placement defect and incus necrosis as the most common causes. The pooled proportion of postoperative ABG<10 dB and ABG<20 dB was 57.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8%-61.4%) and 79% (95% CI: 76.0%-81.8%), respectively. Dead ears were 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.1%). Compared to primary surgery, RSS had a significantly lower rate of ABG<10 dB (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.54%; P < .001). Both revision incudostapedotomy with/without incus reconstruction and malleovestibulopexy are viable options with nonsignificant differences in ABG closure rates (P = .182).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSS is challenging and requires the surgeon to carefully evaluate all potential causes of previous failure and tailor the intervention according to intraoperative findings. In most cases, ABG closure within 20 dB can be achieved with a relatively low risk of dead ears.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"50-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarize current knowledge on the indications, surgical strategies, and auditory outcomes of revision stapes surgery (RSS) for otosclerosis.

Data sources: The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases, including papers published since 2000.

Review methods: The study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We considered original series describing RSS for otosclerosis, reporting postoperative hearing outcomes according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines for conductive hearing loss (CHL) for at least 30 consecutive cases. The quality of included studies was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled proportion and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis were conducted using random effect models.

Results: Nineteen studies were included, for a total of 2602 patients (2735 ears) and 2359 postoperative hearing results. RSS was mostly performed for recurrent CHL with air-bone gap (ABG)>20 dB. Multiple concomitant causes were often present, with prosthesis placement defect and incus necrosis as the most common causes. The pooled proportion of postoperative ABG<10 dB and ABG<20 dB was 57.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.8%-61.4%) and 79% (95% CI: 76.0%-81.8%), respectively. Dead ears were 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%-2.1%). Compared to primary surgery, RSS had a significantly lower rate of ABG<10 dB (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24%-0.54%; P < .001). Both revision incudostapedotomy with/without incus reconstruction and malleovestibulopexy are viable options with nonsignificant differences in ABG closure rates (P = .182).

Conclusion: RSS is challenging and requires the surgeon to carefully evaluate all potential causes of previous failure and tailor the intervention according to intraoperative findings. In most cases, ABG closure within 20 dB can be achieved with a relatively low risk of dead ears.

耳硬化症镫骨翻修手术的适应症、手术策略和听力效果:对 2602 例患者的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。
摘要总结目前有关耳硬化症翻修镫骨手术(RSS)的适应症、手术策略和听力效果的知识:数据来源:在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 在线数据库中进行检索,包括 2000 年以来发表的论文:研究根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行。我们考虑了描述RSS治疗耳硬化症的原始系列研究,根据美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会关于传导性听力损失(CHL)的指南,报告了至少30个连续病例的术后听力结果。纳入研究的质量采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的核对表进行评估。采用随机效应模型对汇总比例和几率比(OR)进行了荟萃分析:共纳入 19 项研究,共有 2602 名患者(2735 耳)和 2359 项术后听力结果。RSS主要用于气骨间隙(ABG)>20 dB的复发性CHL。通常存在多种并发症,其中假体植入缺陷和切口坏死是最常见的原因。术后气骨间隙(ABG)的总比例得出结论:RSS具有挑战性,要求外科医生仔细评估之前失败的所有潜在原因,并根据术中发现调整干预措施。在大多数情况下,ABG 可在 20 dB 范围内闭合,出现死耳的风险相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信