Prospects of Food Taxes for Planetary Health: A Systematic Review of Modeling Studies.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ágota Mészáros, Norbert Dósa, Anna Péterfi, Krisztián Horváth, Zsófia Szarvas, Jeremiás M Balogh, Balázs Munkácsy, Zoltán Vokó
{"title":"Prospects of Food Taxes for Planetary Health: A Systematic Review of Modeling Studies.","authors":"Ágota Mészáros, Norbert Dósa, Anna Péterfi, Krisztián Horváth, Zsófia Szarvas, Jeremiás M Balogh, Balázs Munkácsy, Zoltán Vokó","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the modeling methodologies of fiscal policies on food with health or environmental outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that fiscal policies on food can contribute to addressing the growing burden of noncommunicable diseases and climate change. These policies should be modeled in advance to see the implications for the environment and health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of studies that modeled fiscal policies on the food groups targeted by the EAT-Lancet Commission and examined their health or environmental outcomes. The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched on November 30, 2021. The records were double-screened and data on modeling methods were extracted from the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 studies were included in the review. The most frequently modeled interventions were fruit and vegetable subsidies (n = 19) and carbon taxes on food (n = 17). One study also included a consumer education campaign to enhance the effect of fiscal policy. The outcomes are highly sensitive to consumption change and price elasticities. None of the studies modeled the health effects of environmental outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A model that covered all the relevant aspects of the issue was not found. Some parts were missing from all the included models. It is advisable to model the stability of the amount of diet consumed, either by keeping the amount of food in the diet stable or by taking a more conservative approach and keeping the consumed calories stable. It is preferable to keep the included diseases and environmental boundaries broad to have more valid outcome estimates on this complex issue. A more comprehensive understanding of fiscal policies would allow us to better anticipate the impact of our actions and inactions and thus could lead to more sophisticated measures taken by policymakers.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. 2022 CRD42022291945/.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the modeling methodologies of fiscal policies on food with health or environmental outcomes.

Background: Evidence suggests that fiscal policies on food can contribute to addressing the growing burden of noncommunicable diseases and climate change. These policies should be modeled in advance to see the implications for the environment and health.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of studies that modeled fiscal policies on the food groups targeted by the EAT-Lancet Commission and examined their health or environmental outcomes. The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched on November 30, 2021. The records were double-screened and data on modeling methods were extracted from the included studies.

Results: A total of 55 studies were included in the review. The most frequently modeled interventions were fruit and vegetable subsidies (n = 19) and carbon taxes on food (n = 17). One study also included a consumer education campaign to enhance the effect of fiscal policy. The outcomes are highly sensitive to consumption change and price elasticities. None of the studies modeled the health effects of environmental outcomes.

Conclusions: A model that covered all the relevant aspects of the issue was not found. Some parts were missing from all the included models. It is advisable to model the stability of the amount of diet consumed, either by keeping the amount of food in the diet stable or by taking a more conservative approach and keeping the consumed calories stable. It is preferable to keep the included diseases and environmental boundaries broad to have more valid outcome estimates on this complex issue. A more comprehensive understanding of fiscal policies would allow us to better anticipate the impact of our actions and inactions and thus could lead to more sophisticated measures taken by policymakers.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. 2022 CRD42022291945/.

粮食税促进地球健康的前景:对模型研究的系统回顾。
研究目的本研究旨在分析粮食财政政策与健康或环境结果的建模方法:背景:有证据表明,有关食品的财政政策有助于应对日益加重的非传染性疾病和气候变化负担。应事先对这些政策进行建模,以了解其对环境和健康的影响:方法:我们对以 EAT-Lancet 委员会所针对的食品类别为模型制定财政政策的研究进行了系统回顾,并检查了其健康或环境结果。2021 年 11 月 30 日,对 Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库进行了检索。对记录进行了双重筛选,并从纳入的研究中提取了有关建模方法的数据:结果:共有 55 项研究被纳入综述。最常见的建模干预措施是果蔬补贴(19 项)和食品碳税(17 项)。一项研究还包括消费者教育活动,以增强财政政策的效果。结果对消费变化和价格弹性高度敏感。没有一项研究模拟了环境结果对健康的影响:结论:没有找到一个涵盖该问题所有相关方面的模型。所有纳入的模型都缺少某些部分。最好对饮食消耗量的稳定性进行建模,要么保持饮食中食物量的稳定,要么采取更 保守的方法,保持消耗卡路里的稳定。最好保持所包括的疾病和环境边界宽泛,以便对这一复杂问题进行更有效的结果估算。对财政政策更全面的了解将使我们能够更好地预测我们的行为和不行为所产生的影响,从而使决策者采取更先进的措施:PROSPERO 注册号:2022 CRD42022291945/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信