Low-Carbohydrate Dietary Interventions for Metabolic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mileni Vanti Beretta, Cíntia Aparecida Oliveira Flores, Gabriella Fontes Colameo, Luana Weissheimer Echabe, Fernanda Michielin Busnello
{"title":"Low-Carbohydrate Dietary Interventions for Metabolic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Mileni Vanti Beretta, Cíntia Aparecida Oliveira Flores, Gabriella Fontes Colameo, Luana Weissheimer Echabe, Fernanda Michielin Busnello","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dietary interventions providing different amounts of carbohydrates have been proposed as a means of achieving glycemic control and weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the supporting evidence is heterogeneous, making this recommendation difficult to apply in nutritional clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses on low-carbohydrate (LC) dietary interventions for glycemic control, weight loss, and lipid profile in individuals with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched until September 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials designed to assess glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions in individuals with T2DM were eligible. The AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological aspects of all included studies. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>The LC interventions were associated with a reduction in HbA1c (%) of -0.42 (-1.45 to -0.09; high certainty of evidence) without considering follow-up time; at up to 3 months of follow-up of -0.28 (-0.13 to -0.43); at up to 6 months of follow-up of -0.40 (-0.61 to -0.09); at 6 to 12 months of follow-up of -0.32 (-0.49 to 0.11); and at >12 months of follow-up time of -0.31 (-0.14 to -0.65) compared with control diets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC diets can help reduce HbA1c in individuals with T2DM in the short term (up to 3 months). However, dietary recommendations must always be individualized, as the studies reviewed herein analyzed different populations and used different definitions of what constitutes an LC diet.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO no. CRD42023404197.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Dietary interventions providing different amounts of carbohydrates have been proposed as a means of achieving glycemic control and weight loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the supporting evidence is heterogeneous, making this recommendation difficult to apply in nutritional clinical practice.

Objective: The aim was to assess the quality of evidence from meta-analyses on low-carbohydrate (LC) dietary interventions for glycemic control, weight loss, and lipid profile in individuals with T2DM.

Data sources: The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched until September 2023.

Data extraction: A systematic review was conducted. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials designed to assess glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions in individuals with T2DM were eligible. The AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological aspects of all included studies. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Data analysis: The LC interventions were associated with a reduction in HbA1c (%) of -0.42 (-1.45 to -0.09; high certainty of evidence) without considering follow-up time; at up to 3 months of follow-up of -0.28 (-0.13 to -0.43); at up to 6 months of follow-up of -0.40 (-0.61 to -0.09); at 6 to 12 months of follow-up of -0.32 (-0.49 to 0.11); and at >12 months of follow-up time of -0.31 (-0.14 to -0.65) compared with control diets.

Conclusion: LC diets can help reduce HbA1c in individuals with T2DM in the short term (up to 3 months). However, dietary recommendations must always be individualized, as the studies reviewed herein analyzed different populations and used different definitions of what constitutes an LC diet.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO no. CRD42023404197.

对 2 型糖尿病患者进行低碳水化合物饮食干预以控制代谢:系统综述》。
背景:提供不同数量碳水化合物的膳食干预已被建议作为实现 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制和体重减轻的一种手段;然而,支持性证据各不相同,使得这一建议难以应用于营养临床实践:目的:评估低碳水化合物(LC)饮食干预对 T2DM 患者血糖控制、体重减轻和血脂状况的荟萃分析证据的质量:数据提取:对 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库进行了检索,直至 2023 年 9 月:数据提取:进行了系统综述。符合条件的研究对象包括对旨在评估 T2DM 患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低情况的随机临床试验进行荟萃分析的系统综述。采用 AMSTAR-2 批判性评估工具对所有纳入研究的方法进行评估。数据分析:数据分析:在不考虑随访时间的情况下,低密度脂蛋白血症干预与 HbA1c(%)降低率-0.42(-1.45 至-0.09;证据高度确定性)相关;在长达 3 个月的随访中,HbA1c 降低率为-0.28(-0.13 至-0.43);在长达 6 个月的随访中,HbA1c 降低率为-0.42(-1.45 至-0.09;证据高度确定性)。43);随访长达 6 个月时为 -0.40(-0.61 至 -0.09);随访 6 至 12 个月时为 -0.32(-0.49 至 0.11);随访时间超过 12 个月时与对照组膳食相比为 -0.31(-0.14 至 -0.65):结论:低脂饮食有助于在短期内(3 个月内)降低 T2DM 患者的 HbA1c。结论:低脂饮食有助于在短期内(长达 3 个月)降低 T2DM 患者的 HbA1c。然而,饮食建议必须始终因人而异,因为本文回顾的研究分析了不同的人群,并对低脂饮食采用了不同的定义:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 编号CRD42023404197。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信