Patients who decline blood component transfusion: a narrative review of alternative management strategies.

Q3 Medicine
Victoria Hill
{"title":"Patients who decline blood component transfusion: a narrative review of alternative management strategies.","authors":"Victoria Hill","doi":"10.7748/ns.2024.e12189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood component transfusions are a valuable clinical intervention and are widely used in healthcare. However, some patients may decline transfusion, for example if it conflicts with their religious beliefs or they are concerned about the associated risks. This article details a narrative review that was undertaken to identify what alternative patient management strategies can be used when allogeneic blood transfusion is not feasible, and to explore how these strategies can benefit individuals who decline transfusion and the broader patient population. Searches were conducted to identify articles published between 2013 and 2023. A total of 43 articles were included in the review and thematically analysed. Four main alternative approaches to transfusion were identified from the literature: blood management and conservation; early optimisation; use of synthetic compounds; and proactive management in emergencies. Applying these strategies could reduce risks and costs, enhance the overall use of blood components, and ensure a holistic approach to care and maintaining haemostasis for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19327,"journal":{"name":"Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2024.e12189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood component transfusions are a valuable clinical intervention and are widely used in healthcare. However, some patients may decline transfusion, for example if it conflicts with their religious beliefs or they are concerned about the associated risks. This article details a narrative review that was undertaken to identify what alternative patient management strategies can be used when allogeneic blood transfusion is not feasible, and to explore how these strategies can benefit individuals who decline transfusion and the broader patient population. Searches were conducted to identify articles published between 2013 and 2023. A total of 43 articles were included in the review and thematically analysed. Four main alternative approaches to transfusion were identified from the literature: blood management and conservation; early optimisation; use of synthetic compounds; and proactive management in emergencies. Applying these strategies could reduce risks and costs, enhance the overall use of blood components, and ensure a holistic approach to care and maintaining haemostasis for all patients.

拒绝输注血液成分的患者:替代管理策略综述。
输血是一种很有价值的临床干预措施,在医疗保健中被广泛使用。然而,有些患者可能会拒绝输血,例如输血与其宗教信仰相冲突或担心相关风险。本文详细介绍了一项叙事性综述,该综述旨在确定当异体输血不可行时,可采用哪些替代性患者管理策略,并探讨这些策略如何使拒绝输血的患者和更广泛的患者群体受益。研究人员对 2013 年至 2023 年间发表的文章进行了检索。共有 43 篇文章被纳入综述并进行了专题分析。从文献中发现了四种主要的输血替代方法:血液管理和保存;早期优化;使用合成化合物;紧急情况下的主动管理。采用这些策略可以降低风险和成本,提高血液成分的整体使用率,并确保为所有患者提供整体护理和维持止血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
267
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信