Does Mechanism of Injury Affect Recovery After Sport-Related Concussion in Basketball? A Pilot Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anthony E Bishay, Avi N Albert, Grant H Rigney, James T Corley, Kristen L Williams, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman
{"title":"Does Mechanism of Injury Affect Recovery After Sport-Related Concussion in Basketball? A Pilot Study.","authors":"Anthony E Bishay, Avi N Albert, Grant H Rigney, James T Corley, Kristen L Williams, Jacob Jo, Douglas P Terry, Scott L Zuckerman","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Understanding sport-related concussion (SRC) mechanisms can aid in prevention and treatment. Concussions in basketball have received relatively less attention compared with collision sports. In a cohort of concussed high school basketball players, this pilot study sought to (1) describe the mechanisms of how concussions occur in basketball and (2) assess the relationship between mechanisms and acute symptomatology and recovery time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort, pilot study examined concussed adolescent athletes (aged 14-18 years) treated at a sports concussion center from 11/2017 to 04/2022. The primary independent variable was mechanism of injury, categorized into (1) contact (head-to-head, head-to-body, head-to-ball, head-to-ground), (2) player (offensive play, defensive play, both), and (3) awareness mechanisms (aware, unaware). The outcomes included acute symptom severity, time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. Associations between mechanisms and outcomes were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, independent t-tests, multivariable linear regressions, and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 105 basketball players (16.2 ± 1.4 years; 50.5% male), head-to-ground contact (n = 44/105; 41.9%) was most common. Taking-a-charge (n = 12/53; 22.6%) was the most frequent player mechanism, with similar rates for offensive (n = 24/53; 45.3%) and defensive (n = 23/53; 43.4%) plays. Most were aware of impending collision (n = 37/46; 80.4%). Head-to-body concussions were associated with higher initial symptoms severity scores when compared with head-to-head (β = 0.33, P = .003) and head-to-ground (β = 0.23, P = .050) contacts. Player and awareness mechanisms were not significant predictors of outcome measures. Only higher initial symptom scores were associated with a longer time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pilot study of concussed high school basketball players, head-to-ground was the most common concussion mechanism, with similar rates during offensive and defensive plays. Although head-to-body contact increased acute symptoms, other mechanisms did not predict recovery time. Given the limited information on concussions in basketball, the preliminary results of this pilot study may help inform larger studies on basketball SRC mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Understanding sport-related concussion (SRC) mechanisms can aid in prevention and treatment. Concussions in basketball have received relatively less attention compared with collision sports. In a cohort of concussed high school basketball players, this pilot study sought to (1) describe the mechanisms of how concussions occur in basketball and (2) assess the relationship between mechanisms and acute symptomatology and recovery time.

Methods: A retrospective cohort, pilot study examined concussed adolescent athletes (aged 14-18 years) treated at a sports concussion center from 11/2017 to 04/2022. The primary independent variable was mechanism of injury, categorized into (1) contact (head-to-head, head-to-body, head-to-ball, head-to-ground), (2) player (offensive play, defensive play, both), and (3) awareness mechanisms (aware, unaware). The outcomes included acute symptom severity, time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. Associations between mechanisms and outcomes were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, independent t-tests, multivariable linear regressions, and Cox regression.

Results: Of 105 basketball players (16.2 ± 1.4 years; 50.5% male), head-to-ground contact (n = 44/105; 41.9%) was most common. Taking-a-charge (n = 12/53; 22.6%) was the most frequent player mechanism, with similar rates for offensive (n = 24/53; 45.3%) and defensive (n = 23/53; 43.4%) plays. Most were aware of impending collision (n = 37/46; 80.4%). Head-to-body concussions were associated with higher initial symptoms severity scores when compared with head-to-head (β = 0.33, P = .003) and head-to-ground (β = 0.23, P = .050) contacts. Player and awareness mechanisms were not significant predictors of outcome measures. Only higher initial symptom scores were associated with a longer time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play.

Conclusion: In this pilot study of concussed high school basketball players, head-to-ground was the most common concussion mechanism, with similar rates during offensive and defensive plays. Although head-to-body contact increased acute symptoms, other mechanisms did not predict recovery time. Given the limited information on concussions in basketball, the preliminary results of this pilot study may help inform larger studies on basketball SRC mechanisms.

损伤机制会影响篮球运动相关脑震荡后的恢复吗?一项试点研究。
背景和目标:了解运动相关脑震荡(SRC)的机理有助于预防和治疗。与碰撞运动相比,篮球运动中的脑震荡受到的关注相对较少。本试验性研究以一组脑震荡的高中篮球运动员为对象,旨在:(1)描述篮球运动中脑震荡的发生机制;(2)评估脑震荡发生机制与急性症状和恢复时间之间的关系:这项回顾性队列试点研究对 2017 年 11 月至 2022 年 4 月期间在运动脑震荡中心接受治疗的青少年运动员(14-18 岁)的脑震荡情况进行了调查。主要自变量是受伤机制,分为:(1) 接触(头对头、头对身体、头对球、头对地);(2) 球员(进攻、防守、两者);(3) 意识机制(意识到、未意识到)。结果包括急性症状严重程度、恢复学习时间、症状缓解和恢复比赛。采用单因素方差分析、独立 t 检验、多变量线性回归和 Cox 回归分析了机制与结果之间的关联:结果:在 105 名篮球运动员(16.2 ± 1.4 岁;50.5% 为男性)中,头对地接触(n = 44/105;41.9%)最为常见。冲撞(n = 12/53;22.6%)是最常见的球员机制,进攻(n = 24/53;45.3%)和防守(n = 23/53;43.4%)的比例相似。大多数球员都意识到了即将发生的碰撞(n = 37/46;80.4%)。与头对头(β = 0.33,P = .003)和头对地(β = 0.23,P = .050)接触相比,头对身体的脑震荡与较高的初始症状严重程度评分相关。玩家和意识机制对结果测量的预测作用不明显。只有较高的初始症状评分与较长的恢复学习、症状缓解和恢复比赛时间有关:在这项针对脑震荡高中篮球运动员的试点研究中,头对地是最常见的脑震荡机制,在进攻和防守中的发生率相似。虽然头对身体的接触会加重急性症状,但其他机制并不能预测恢复时间。鉴于有关篮球运动中脑震荡的信息有限,这项试点研究的初步结果可能有助于为更大规模的篮球脑震荡机制研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信