Cardiac Output Directly Influences Intracardiac Air After Venous Air Embolism: An Echocardiographic Model Comparing Position Change on Intracardiac Air Bubble Clearance.
Chris Marcellino, James A Nelson, John L D Atkinson, Jeffrey J Pasternak, Arnoley S Abcejo
{"title":"Cardiac Output Directly Influences Intracardiac Air After Venous Air Embolism: An Echocardiographic Model Comparing Position Change on Intracardiac Air Bubble Clearance.","authors":"Chris Marcellino, James A Nelson, John L D Atkinson, Jeffrey J Pasternak, Arnoley S Abcejo","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Venous air embolism (VAE) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Prevention and management of VAE include cessation of air entrainment, positioning changes, and hemodynamic support. The degree to which position change and cardiac output (CO) moderate resolution of intracardiac air has not been rigorously studied using contemporary transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort-type study aimed to identify the effect of supine vs sitting positioning on the movement and resolution of intracardiac air. In 20 patients undergoing seated neurosurgery, central venous air aspiration catheters were placed through the median basilic vein. TEE was used to estimate the time required for clearance of agitated microbubbles from the right atrium and ventricle in both the supine and sitting position. Estimates of CO were also obtained echocardiographically in each position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average clearance time was faster in the sitting vs the supine position with no significant difference in CO. A negative correlation between CO and right atrial clearance time across all patients was demonstrated with a Pearson coefficient of -0.4 (95% CI -0.07, -0.65) with P = .02.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During VAE, both patient position and CO can significantly affect how bubbles move through intracardiac chambers. However, augmenting CO during VAE may be clinically more feasible, efficient, and productive than changing positioning-especially during crises unless the changing in position is intended to halt the entrainment of air. Further TEE studies of intravascular air movement affected by other position changes (lateral, reverse Trendelenburg) and vasopressors should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"908-914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Venous air embolism (VAE) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Prevention and management of VAE include cessation of air entrainment, positioning changes, and hemodynamic support. The degree to which position change and cardiac output (CO) moderate resolution of intracardiac air has not been rigorously studied using contemporary transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
Methods: This observational cohort-type study aimed to identify the effect of supine vs sitting positioning on the movement and resolution of intracardiac air. In 20 patients undergoing seated neurosurgery, central venous air aspiration catheters were placed through the median basilic vein. TEE was used to estimate the time required for clearance of agitated microbubbles from the right atrium and ventricle in both the supine and sitting position. Estimates of CO were also obtained echocardiographically in each position.
Results: Average clearance time was faster in the sitting vs the supine position with no significant difference in CO. A negative correlation between CO and right atrial clearance time across all patients was demonstrated with a Pearson coefficient of -0.4 (95% CI -0.07, -0.65) with P = .02.
Conclusion: During VAE, both patient position and CO can significantly affect how bubbles move through intracardiac chambers. However, augmenting CO during VAE may be clinically more feasible, efficient, and productive than changing positioning-especially during crises unless the changing in position is intended to halt the entrainment of air. Further TEE studies of intravascular air movement affected by other position changes (lateral, reverse Trendelenburg) and vasopressors should be considered.
背景和目的:静脉空气栓塞(VAE)可导致严重的发病率和死亡率。VAE 的预防和处理包括停止空气夹带、体位改变和血液动力学支持。目前还没有使用现代经食道超声心动图(TEE)对体位改变和心输出量(CO)在多大程度上缓和心内积气的消散进行过严格研究:这项观察性队列研究旨在确定仰卧位与坐位对心内积气的移动和排出的影响。在 20 名接受坐位神经外科手术的患者中,通过正中基底静脉置入中心静脉空气抽吸导管。使用 TEE 估测仰卧位和坐位时右心房和心室中搅动的微气泡清除所需的时间。此外,还对每种体位下的二氧化碳进行了超声心动图估算:结果:与仰卧位相比,坐位的平均清除时间更快,而 CO 没有明显差异。所有患者的 CO 与右心房清除时间呈负相关,Pearson 系数为 -0.4 (95% CI -0.07, -0.65),P = .02:在 VAE 过程中,患者体位和 CO 都会显著影响气泡在心腔内的移动。然而,在 VAE 期间增强 CO 可能比改变体位更可行、更有效、更有成效,尤其是在危机期间,除非改变体位是为了阻止空气夹带。应考虑对受其他体位改变(侧卧位、反向 Trendelenburg)和血管加压药影响的血管内空气运动进行进一步的 TEE 研究。
期刊介绍:
Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery.
Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.