Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1159/000541347
Bharathi Naik, Arun Ghoshal, Anuja Damani, Pankaj Singhai, Ravindra Prabhu Attur, Naveen Salins, Ajith M Nayak, Shankar Prasad Nagaraju
{"title":"Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India.","authors":"Bharathi Naik, Arun Ghoshal, Anuja Damani, Pankaj Singhai, Ravindra Prabhu Attur, Naveen Salins, Ajith M Nayak, Shankar Prasad Nagaraju","doi":"10.1159/000541347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs.

Conclusion: Despite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.

终末期肾病患者对预先护理计划的偏好:在印度一家三级医疗中心的肾科医疗服务提供者中开展的横断面调查。
简介:预先护理计划(ACP)对于管理终末期肾病(ESKD)患者至关重要,但将其纳入临床实践的程度仍然有限,尤其是在中低收入国家。本研究探讨了印度一家三级医疗中心的肾脏病医疗服务提供者对终末期肾病患者 ACP 的偏好、态度和感知障碍:对印度一家三级医疗中心的肾科医疗服务提供者进行了横断面调查。调查内容包括人口统计学、ACP 知识和态度、当前实践以及感知到的障碍和促进因素。数据收集时间为 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,对定性数据进行了主题分析:共有 50 名医疗服务提供者参与。虽然 36% 的医疗服务提供者承认 ACP 的重要性,但只有 8% 的医疗服务提供者经常参与 ACP 讨论。主要障碍包括培训不足(22%)、利益相关者对讨论 ACP 的重要性缺乏认识(20%)、文化障碍(18%)、缺乏时间(14%)以及缺乏讨论 ACP 的机构协议(14%)。其他障碍还包括家属因害怕失去希望而隐瞒患者的健康信息(16%),以及患者/家属在讨论 ACP 时感到不适(12%)。医疗服务提供者表示需要结构化的 ACP 协议和教育计划:尽管认识到了 ACP 的重要性,但在印度,ACP 在 ESKD 患者的护理中仍未得到充分利用。通过有针对性的干预措施来解决已发现的障碍,可以加强 ACP 的实践并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信