Safety and effectiveness of dual channels vancomycin administration in the treatment of intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ao Jiao, Wanjiang Hao, He Yang, Yanli Du
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of dual channels vancomycin administration in the treatment of intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery.","authors":"Ao Jiao, Wanjiang Hao, He Yang, Yanli Du","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin intravenous drip combined with vancomycin intrathecal injection in the treatment of intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery. From January 2020 to June 2022, 80 patients with intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery were selected and randomly divided into 2 subgroups; there were 40 patients in each subgroup. All patients were treated with vancomycin. The control subgroup was medicated with intravenous drip, and the observation subgroup was treated through 2 channels (intravenous drip + intrathecal injection), with a course of 7 days. The clinical efficacy, intracranial pressure, infection control time, routine indexes of cerebrospinal fluid (white blood cell count [WBC], glucose content [Glu], and total protein content [Pro]) and the incidence of adverse reactions were contrasted between the 2 subgroups. Versus the control subgroup, the total effective rate in the observation subgroup was notably higher (95.00% vs 77.50%). After treatment, aiming at the intracranial pressure and infection control time, versus the control subgroup (146.20 ± 22.37) mmH2O and (9.86 ± 1.62) days, the observation subgroup were (125.43 ± 18.5) mmH2O and (7.35 ± 1.57) days respectively, which were notably lower. After treatment, versus the control subgroup, the concentrations of WBC and Pro in cerebrospinal fluid in the observation subgroup were lower, and the content of Glu was higher. There was no statistical distinction in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 subgroups (17.50% vs 10.00%). Two-channel administration of vancomycin can improve the clinical efficacy of internal infection after severe craniocerebral injury, reduce intracranial pressure, and cerebrospinal fluid WBC and Pro levels, and has high safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin intravenous drip combined with vancomycin intrathecal injection in the treatment of intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery. From January 2020 to June 2022, 80 patients with intracranial infection after severe brain injury surgery were selected and randomly divided into 2 subgroups; there were 40 patients in each subgroup. All patients were treated with vancomycin. The control subgroup was medicated with intravenous drip, and the observation subgroup was treated through 2 channels (intravenous drip + intrathecal injection), with a course of 7 days. The clinical efficacy, intracranial pressure, infection control time, routine indexes of cerebrospinal fluid (white blood cell count [WBC], glucose content [Glu], and total protein content [Pro]) and the incidence of adverse reactions were contrasted between the 2 subgroups. Versus the control subgroup, the total effective rate in the observation subgroup was notably higher (95.00% vs 77.50%). After treatment, aiming at the intracranial pressure and infection control time, versus the control subgroup (146.20 ± 22.37) mmH2O and (9.86 ± 1.62) days, the observation subgroup were (125.43 ± 18.5) mmH2O and (7.35 ± 1.57) days respectively, which were notably lower. After treatment, versus the control subgroup, the concentrations of WBC and Pro in cerebrospinal fluid in the observation subgroup were lower, and the content of Glu was higher. There was no statistical distinction in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 subgroups (17.50% vs 10.00%). Two-channel administration of vancomycin can improve the clinical efficacy of internal infection after severe craniocerebral injury, reduce intracranial pressure, and cerebrospinal fluid WBC and Pro levels, and has high safety.

双通道万古霉素治疗重症颅脑损伤手术后颅内感染的安全性和有效性。
摘要] 目的 观察万古霉素静脉滴注联合万古霉素鞘内注射治疗重症颅脑损伤术后颅内感染的临床疗效及安全性。2020年1月至2022年6月,选取80例重症颅脑损伤术后颅内感染患者,随机分为2个亚组,每组40例。所有患者均接受万古霉素治疗。对照亚组采用静脉滴注,观察亚组采用双通道治疗(静脉滴注+鞘内注射),疗程为7天。对比两组的临床疗效、颅内压、感染控制时间、脑脊液常规指标(白细胞计数[WBC]、葡萄糖含量[Glu]和总蛋白含量[Pro])和不良反应发生率。与对照亚组相比,观察亚组的总有效率明显更高(95.00% 对 77.50%)。治疗后,针对颅内压和感染控制时间,对照亚组分别为(146.20±22.37)mmH2O 和(9.86±1.62)天,观察亚组分别为(125.43±18.5)mmH2O 和(7.35±1.57)天,明显低于对照亚组。治疗后,与对照亚组相比,观察亚组脑脊液中白细胞和 Pro 的浓度较低,Glu 的含量较高。两个亚组的不良反应发生率没有统计学差异(17.50% 对 10.00%)。万古霉素双通道给药可提高重型颅脑损伤后内脏感染的临床疗效,降低颅内压、脑脊液WBC和Pro水平,安全性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信