{"title":"Immunization strategies for individuals with sickle cell anemia: A narrative review.","authors":"Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Getrude Uzoma Obeagu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a hereditary blood disorder characterized by the production of abnormal hemoglobin, leading to the formation of sickle-shaped red blood cells. These distorted cells can obstruct blood flow, causing vaso-occlusive crises and increasing the risk of severe infections due to functional asplenia and immune system dysregulation. Immunization is a crucial strategy to mitigate infection-related complications in individuals with SCA, necessitating a comprehensive and tailored vaccination approach. Current immunization guidelines for individuals with SCA recommend a combination of standard and additional vaccines to address their heightened susceptibility to infections. Key vaccines include pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) and polysaccharide (PPSV23) vaccines, meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B (MenB) vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, annual influenza vaccine, and hepatitis A and B vaccines. These vaccinations aim to provide broad protection against pathogens that pose significant risks to patients with SCA. Despite generally adequate immune responses, the variability in vaccine efficacy due to immune dysfunction necessitates booster doses and additional vaccinations. This narrative review highlights the importance of adhering to current immunization recommendations and addresses challenges such as access to care, vaccine hesitancy, and monitoring vaccination status.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a hereditary blood disorder characterized by the production of abnormal hemoglobin, leading to the formation of sickle-shaped red blood cells. These distorted cells can obstruct blood flow, causing vaso-occlusive crises and increasing the risk of severe infections due to functional asplenia and immune system dysregulation. Immunization is a crucial strategy to mitigate infection-related complications in individuals with SCA, necessitating a comprehensive and tailored vaccination approach. Current immunization guidelines for individuals with SCA recommend a combination of standard and additional vaccines to address their heightened susceptibility to infections. Key vaccines include pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) and polysaccharide (PPSV23) vaccines, meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B (MenB) vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, annual influenza vaccine, and hepatitis A and B vaccines. These vaccinations aim to provide broad protection against pathogens that pose significant risks to patients with SCA. Despite generally adequate immune responses, the variability in vaccine efficacy due to immune dysfunction necessitates booster doses and additional vaccinations. This narrative review highlights the importance of adhering to current immunization recommendations and addresses challenges such as access to care, vaccine hesitancy, and monitoring vaccination status.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.