Long-term outcomes of mechanochemical ablation using the Clarivein device for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence.

Abstract

Objective: The short-term anatomical success rates of mechanochemical ablation using the Clarivein device (Merit Medical) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence are high. However, the anatomical success rates seem to drop over time. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of GSV treatment using the Clarivein and to assess whether specific anatomical features better correlate with clinical or quality of life (QoL)-related outcomes.

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective cohort study in follow-up of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial using Clarivein with liquid polidocanol for the treatment of GSV incompetence. The primary outcome was anatomical success (AS), defined as complete occlusion or a recanalized segment, irrespective of reflux, of <10 cm in length. In addition, reflux-free anatomical success (RF-AS) was determined, and defined as complete occlusion or a recanalized segment with <10 cm of reflux. Clinical success was assessed using the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and QoL was assessed using the Dutch version of the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (DAVVQ) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Subgroup analyses were performed based on whether AS or RF-AS was achieved or not.

Results: A total of 109 patients (115 limbs) were included. The mean follow-up time was 8.4 ± 0.9 years (range, 5.5-10.3 years). AS was seen in 60.5% of limbs, and RF-AS was seen in 72.8% of limbs. Compared with baseline, the overall mean VCSS improved from 5.3 ± 2.4 to 4.1 ± 2.4, and the overall median DAVVQ score from 13.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 8.7-20.0) to 10.5 (IQR, 5.3-16.2) (P < .001). Improvement in VCSS was only significant in patients with successful treatment: from 5.5 ± 2.7 to 3.7 ± 2.5 (P < .001) if AS was achieved and from 5.0 ± 1.7 to 4.5 ± 1.9 (P = .20) if AS was not achieved. The same results were found for DAVVQ scores: improvement from13.5 (IQR, 8.7-20.6) to 10.3 (IQR, 3.0-14.5) (P < .01) if AS was achieved and from 12.9 (IQR, 8.3-19.3) to 10.8 (IQR, 6.7-18.2) (P = .35) if AS was not achieved. Regarding the overall SF-36 scores, the domains of vitality, mental health, and general health worsened significantly.

Conclusions: In over 8 years of follow-up, the anatomical success rate after the treatment of GSV incompetence using the Clarivein device decreased to 60.5%. However, clinical scores and disease-specific QoL still improved significantly compared with baseline. We found no convincing evidence that the absence of reflux correlates better with clinical and QoL-related outcomes compared with recanalization irrespective of reflux.