How dermatologic surgeons decide to proceed with surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer when site identification is initially uncertain: A nationwide, multicenter, prospective study.
Areeba Ahmed, Amanda Maisel-Campbell, Victoria J Shi, Eric Koza, Melissa Ma, Misha Haq, Umer Nadir, Michael D Yi, Loma Dave, Farhana Ikmal Hisham, Katherine A Lin, Sarah A Ibrahim, Bianca Y Kang, McKenzie A Dirr, Juliet L Aylward, Omar Bari, Hamza Bhatti, Diana Bolotin, Basil S Cherpelis, Joel L Cohen, Sean Condon, Sheila Farhang, Bahar Firoz, Algin B Garrett, Roy G Geronemus, Nicholas J Golda, Dyann Helming, Tatyana R Humphreys, Eva A Hurst, Oren H Jacobson, S Brian Jiang, Pritesh S Karia, Arash Kimyai-Asadi, David J Kouba, M Laurin Council, Marilyn Le, Deborah F MacFarlane, Ian A Maher, Stanley J Miller, Eduardo K Moioli, Meghan Morrow, Julia Neckman, Timothy Pearson, Samuel R Peterson, Christine Poblete-Lopez, Chad L Prather, Jennifer S Ranario, Ashley G Rubin, Chrysalyne D Schmults, Andrew M Swanson, Christopher Urban, Y Gloria Xu, Ross Pearlman, Simon Yoo, Vishnu Harikumar, Alexandra Weil, Matthew Schaeffer, Sanjana Iyengar, Emily Poon, Brian A Cahn, Murad Alam
{"title":"How dermatologic surgeons decide to proceed with surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancer when site identification is initially uncertain: A nationwide, multicenter, prospective study.","authors":"Areeba Ahmed, Amanda Maisel-Campbell, Victoria J Shi, Eric Koza, Melissa Ma, Misha Haq, Umer Nadir, Michael D Yi, Loma Dave, Farhana Ikmal Hisham, Katherine A Lin, Sarah A Ibrahim, Bianca Y Kang, McKenzie A Dirr, Juliet L Aylward, Omar Bari, Hamza Bhatti, Diana Bolotin, Basil S Cherpelis, Joel L Cohen, Sean Condon, Sheila Farhang, Bahar Firoz, Algin B Garrett, Roy G Geronemus, Nicholas J Golda, Dyann Helming, Tatyana R Humphreys, Eva A Hurst, Oren H Jacobson, S Brian Jiang, Pritesh S Karia, Arash Kimyai-Asadi, David J Kouba, M Laurin Council, Marilyn Le, Deborah F MacFarlane, Ian A Maher, Stanley J Miller, Eduardo K Moioli, Meghan Morrow, Julia Neckman, Timothy Pearson, Samuel R Peterson, Christine Poblete-Lopez, Chad L Prather, Jennifer S Ranario, Ashley G Rubin, Chrysalyne D Schmults, Andrew M Swanson, Christopher Urban, Y Gloria Xu, Ross Pearlman, Simon Yoo, Vishnu Harikumar, Alexandra Weil, Matthew Schaeffer, Sanjana Iyengar, Emily Poon, Brian A Cahn, Murad Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.08.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies show how dermatologic surgeons manage problems with site identification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate frequency and characterize management of skin cancer treated by surgery when the anatomic location of the tumor is in question.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide, prospective, multisite cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17,076 cases at 22 centers, 98 (0.60%) were lesions in question for which site identification was initially uncertain, with these more often in patients who were male, older, and biopsied more than 30 days ago. Surgeons employed on average 5.0 (95% CI: 4.61-5.39) additional techniques to confirm the site location, with common approaches including: re-checking available documentation (90 lesions, 92%); performing an expanded physical examination (89 lesions, 91%); and asking the patient to point using a mirror (61 lesions, 62%). In 15%, photographs were requested from the biopsying provider, and also in 15%, frozen section biopsies were obtained. In 10%, the referring physician was contacted. Eventually, surgeons succeeded in definitively identifying 82% (80 of 98) of initially uncertain sites, with the remaining 18% (18 of 98) postponed. Most postponed surgeries were at non-facial sites.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Sites were academic centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the anatomic location of the tumor is uncertain, dermatologic surgeons use multiple methods to identify the site, and sometimes cases are postponed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.08.073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Few studies show how dermatologic surgeons manage problems with site identification.
Objective: To estimate frequency and characterize management of skin cancer treated by surgery when the anatomic location of the tumor is in question.
Results: Among 17,076 cases at 22 centers, 98 (0.60%) were lesions in question for which site identification was initially uncertain, with these more often in patients who were male, older, and biopsied more than 30 days ago. Surgeons employed on average 5.0 (95% CI: 4.61-5.39) additional techniques to confirm the site location, with common approaches including: re-checking available documentation (90 lesions, 92%); performing an expanded physical examination (89 lesions, 91%); and asking the patient to point using a mirror (61 lesions, 62%). In 15%, photographs were requested from the biopsying provider, and also in 15%, frozen section biopsies were obtained. In 10%, the referring physician was contacted. Eventually, surgeons succeeded in definitively identifying 82% (80 of 98) of initially uncertain sites, with the remaining 18% (18 of 98) postponed. Most postponed surgeries were at non-facial sites.
Limitations: Sites were academic centers.
Conclusions: When the anatomic location of the tumor is uncertain, dermatologic surgeons use multiple methods to identify the site, and sometimes cases are postponed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.